| Literature DB >> 35008859 |
Dou Ye1,2, Fang Du1,3, Qingxiu Hu1, Yajie Zou1, Xue Bai4.
Abstract
Pleurotus eryngii, a highly valued edible fungus, is one of the major commercially cultivated mushrooms in China. The development of P. eryngii, especially during the stage of primordium differentiation, is easily affected by light. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the response of primordium differentiation to light remains unknown. In the present study, primordium expression profiles under blue-light stimulation, red-light stimulation, and exposure to darkness were compared using high-throughput sequencing. A total of 16,321 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from three comparisons. GO enrichment analysis showed that a large number of DEGs were related to light stimulation and amino acid biosynthesis. KEGG analyses demonstrated that the MAPK signaling pathway, oxidative phosphorylation pathway, and RNA transport were most active during primordium differentiation. Furthermore, it was predicted that the blue-light photoreceptor WC-1 and Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase PHR play important roles in the primordium differentiation of P. eryngii. Taken together, the results of this study provide a speculative mechanism that light induces primordium differentiation and a foundation for further research on fruiting body development in P. eryngii.Entities:
Keywords: PHR; Pleurotus eryngii; WC-1; high-throughput sequencing; primordium differentiation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35008859 PMCID: PMC8745762 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Morphological features of P. eryngii at each stage under different light treatments. The different light treatments used in the experiment, red light, blue light, and darkness, are presented along the abscissa. The different development periods are presented along the ordinate.
Summary of the transcript expression levels.
| Sample | Raw Reads | Clean Reads | Valid Bases | Q30 | GC | Total Mapped | Uniquely Mapped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 53,102,878 | 51,075,114 | 92.98% | 93.61% | 53.35% | 46,565,408 (91.17%) | 46,088,648 (90.24%) |
| B2 | 52,458,130 | 50,371,972 | 93.00% | 93.59% | 53.41% | 45,845,104 (91.01%) | 45,378,994 (90.09%) |
| B3 | 52,809,116 | 50,727,940 | 93.13% | 93.54% | 53.16% | 46,107,974 (90.89%) | 45,632,257 (89.95%) |
| R1 | 53,888,394 | 51,658,590 | 90.86% | 91.57% | 53.39% | 47,324,146 (91.61%) | 46,851,732 (90.69%) |
| R2 | 51,919,842 | 51,342,892 | 92.10% | 93.07% | 53.47% | 47,083,554 (91.70%) | 46,617,500 (90.80%) |
| R3 | 52,589,620 | 50,549,472 | 92.29% | 93.47% | 53.44% | 45,918,518 (90.84%) | 45,453,630 (89.92%) |
| D1 | 54,244,320 | 52,057,380 | 92.87% | 93.37% | 53.31% | 47,507,321 (91.26%) | 47,010,123 (90.30%) |
| D2 | 53,015,062 | 51,179,330 | 93.53% | 94.05% | 53.21% | 46,807,561 (91.46%) | 46,289,612 (90.45%) |
| D3 | 53,783,370 | 51,820,220 | 93.42% | 94.38% | 53.39% | 47,417,325 (91.50%) | 46,916,526 (90.54%) |
Note: B = Blue-light primordium; R = red-light primordium; D = Dark primordium.
Figure 2Transcriptional relationships among 9 samples.
Figure 3Gene expression comparisons. (A). The gene expression profile of DEGs. (B). Venn diagram of the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes between D vs. B, D vs. R, and R vs. B are shown.
Figure 4Statistical results of KEGG and GO analyses. (A–C). Pie chart showing the numbers of GO terms across the three categories. (D). The bars indicate the numbers of KEGG pathways.
Figure 5Gene Ontology (GO) database enrichment analysis of DEGs in primordium between blue or red-light conditions and darkness. (A). DEGs between D and B. (B). DEGs between D and R.
Figure 6The top 20 enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs in primordium between blue or red light and darkness. (A). DEGs between D and R. (B). DEGs between D and B. The color intensity is proportional to the enrichment significance, and the circle size indicates the number of enriched genes.
Figure 7Gene Ontology (GO) database enrichment analysis of DEGs in primordium between blue light and red light. (A). DEGs upregulated under blue light. (B) DEGs upregulated under red light.
Figure 8The top 20 enriched KEGG pathways from R vs. B. (A). Enriched KEGG pathways of downregulated DEGs. (B). Enriched KEGG pathways of upregulated DEGs. The color intensity is proportional to the enrichment significance, and the circle size indicates the number of enriched genes.
Figure 9Genes involved in primordium formation in P. eryngii. (A). The DEGs between darkness and red light. (B). The DEGs between darkness and blue light. The gene ID number and the name of the homolog are indicated on the right side of each subplot. The gene expression values (FPKMs) were transformed to Z-score values.
DEGs enrich to GO terms related to light.
| Gene ID | Gene Name | Foldchange | Pval | GO ID | GO Term | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1391851 |
| 135.255861 | 0.00109307 | GO: 0003904, | deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase activity, | Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase |
| 1391738 |
| 15.2406249 | 6.29 × 10−9 | GO: 0003904, | deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase activity, | Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase |
| 1447773 |
| 13.401109 | 0.01898976 | GO: 0003904, | deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase activity, | Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase |
| 1350178 |
| 12.9653923 | 0.04674992 | GO: 0009644 | response to high light intensity | Probable quinone oxidoreductase |
| 1506953 |
| 8.97926851 | 0.03066054 | GO: 0003904, | deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase activity, | Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase |
| 1432018 |
| 5.78562604 | 0.02793471 | GO: 0032391 | photoreceptor connecting cilium | Tubulin-folding cofactor C |
| 1483280 |
| 5.78562604 | 0.02793471 | GO: 0032391 | photoreceptor connecting cilium | Tubulin-folding cofactor C |
| 1507938 |
| 5.78562604 | 0.02793471 | GO: 0032391 | photoreceptor connecting cilium | Tubulin-folding cofactor C |
| 1164413 |
| 2.40057781 | 0.01738034 | GO: 0009881, | photoreceptor activity, | White collar 1 protein |
| 1445782 |
| 0.47726612 | 0.03675021 | GO: 0010218 | response to far red light | Protein argonaute 1 |
| 1486735 |
| 0.31928656 | 0.04423718 | GO: 0009416 | response to light stimulus | N-glycosylase/DNA lyase |
| 1557381 |
| 0.21401009 | 0.04503058 | GO: 0009644 | response to high light intensity | Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor SR45a |
| 1234511 |
| 0.02342917 | 0.00013587 | GO: 0009644 | response to high light intensity | Probable quinone oxidoreductase |
Figure 10Protein-protein interaction network.
Figure 11RT-qPCR validation. The X-axis shows the names of the DEGs. The left Y-axis shows the logarithm of the relative expression level. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of three biological replicates of RT-qPCR analysis.
Figure 12Brief summary.
Primers for RT-qPCR.
| GENE | Description | Primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
|
| Glyceraldehyde-phosphate dehydrogenase | F: ACGATGTCCGACGATGAG |
| R: GACGGCGATGTTGGTGAA | ||
|
| THO complex subunit 3 | F: ATGACGGTTCGAGAGACACC |
| R: TGGCGCAAATATCGATGTAA | ||
|
| Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase | F: GATCTCAGGGTTGCGGATAA |
| R: GGATGTGGAGTTCGGCTAAA | ||
|
| Importin subunit | F: GTGTGAGGCAACCCAAAACT |
| R: CCGTAGTCCTGAGCCTCTTG | ||
|
| ATP-dependent helicase | F: CCCCATCCAATTGTAACCTG |
| R: AACCAGAATGGATGGCAGTC | ||
|
| High-affinity methionine permease | F: CTGGTGATAGCACCCTTCTTAC |
| R: CCCAGCACGATGATACCAATAC | ||
|
| ATP synthase subunit delta | F: GTTAACATCTCGGCCGCTAC |
| R: AGGGCCTCTTGAAGATTGGT | ||
|
| Transcriptional regulator RFX1 | F: CATGCGAGACTTGACCATTAGA |
| R: TACTACACCGGATTGAGCTTTG | ||
|
| Rho1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 | F: GCGTTTCCTGAACCACAAAT |
| R: CTTCGTCGTGATCTGCGTAA | ||
|
| Checkpoint protein rad17 | F: CTGTTCACCCAAAGAAGGTAGA |
| R: CGCCAGGATCTTTCGGTATT | ||
|
| M-phase inducer phosphatase | F: CCGAAGATCCACTACCCTGA |
| R: GATGCCATCGCCGTAAGTAT | ||
|
| Transcription factor | F: CGGCCAGTACGTAACATGAA |
| R: ATCGTGAGGCACTGAGAACC | ||
|
| Protein kinase wis1 | F: TCCATCGAGATGTGAAACCA |
| R: TATTTTGGGATTCGCCTTTG | ||
|
| Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase BOA4 | F:CTGGATAGGATGGACGAAGATTAG |
| R: GACGAAGAGACGAGTTGAAGAG | ||
|
| Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CLM2 | F: GAAGGAGGTGTTGAGATGGAAT |
| R: CGATCCTTTCGGGATGAAGTAA | ||
|
| quinone oxidoreductase | F: CCAGCAGTCTTGGGTAAAGAA |
| R: A GGTGTACTTGCGAGCTTGAT |