| Literature DB >> 35008694 |
Agnieszka Richert1, Ewa Olewnik-Kruszkowska2, Grażyna B Dąbrowska1, Henryk P Dąbrowski3.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to produce bactericidal polymer films containing birch tar (BT). The produced polymer films contain PLA, plasticiser PEG (5% wt.) and birch tar (1, 5 and 10% wt.). Compared to plasticised PLA, films with BT were characterised by reduced elongation at break and reduced water vapour permeability, which was the lowest in the case of film with 10% wt. BT content. Changes in the morphology of the produced materials were observed by performing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis; the addition of BT caused the surface of the film to be non-uniform and to contain recesses. FTIR analysis of plasticised PLA/BT films showed that the addition of birch tar did not change the crystallinity of the obtained materials. According to ISO 22196: 2011, the PLA film with 10% wt. BT content showed the highest antibacterial effect against the plant pathogens A. tumefaciens, X. campestris, P. brassicacearum, P. corrugata, P. syringae. It was found that the introduction of birch tar to plasticised PLA leads to a material with biocidal effect and favourable physicochemical and structural properties, which classifies this material for agricultural and horticultural applications.Entities:
Keywords: agriculturalfilms; antibacterial properties; birch tar; polylactide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35008694 PMCID: PMC8745625 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Positions of characteristic bands present in the studied polymeric films.
| Group | Positions of Characteristic Bands (cm−1) |
|---|---|
| -OH | 3600–3000 |
| -CH stretching ((-CH3(asym) and -CH3(sym)) | 2996 and 2947 |
| -CH and -CH2 | 2880 |
| -C=O | 1763 |
| -CH3 | 1457 |
| -CH deformation and asymmetric bands | 1386 and 1360 |
| C-O stretching modes of the ester | 1212 and 1183 |
| -C-O-C | 1085 |
| C-COO stretching vibration | 873 |
| deformation vibration of CO | 756 |
Figure 1FTIR-ATR spectra of plasticised PLA with and without of BT.
Figure 2SEM analysis of the surface of plasticised PLA (L) and plasticised PLA with BT materials (Ld1–Ld10) materials, magnifications at 1000× (A) and 5000× (B).
Figure 3Surface images of the obtained plasticised PLA (L) and plasticised PLA with BT (Ld1–Ld10): photos taken using AFM.
Roughness parameters of plasticised PLA and plasticised PLA with BT (Ld1–Ld10).
| Sample | Rq [nm] | Ra [nm] |
|---|---|---|
| L | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Ld1 | 43.6 | 32.9 |
| Ld5 | 55.5 | 43.9 |
| Ld10 | 73.9 | 62.6 |
Figure 4Changes in CaCl2 mass versus time during analyses of WVPR of the studied materials.
Figure 5Water vapour transmission rate of the studied polymeric films.
Mechanical properties of plasticised PLA-based films with and without of BT with ± standard deviation (SD).
| Sample | Young’s Modulus (E) ± SD | Elongation at Break (ε) ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| L | 1097.4 ± 67.3 | 15.8 ± 0.8 |
| Ld1 | 1121.1 ± 51.1 | 8.2 ± 0.5 |
| Ld5 | 1284.7 ± 26.2 | 7.4 ± 0.3 |
| Ld10 | 1314.6 ± 91.4 | 5.7 ± 0.3 |
Antibacterial activity of plasticised PLA and plasticised PLA with the addition BT against plant pathogens. Note: (-) not determined.
| Quantitative Assessment of Activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Description | Number of Bacteria Recovered | Log Value | R | % Reduction | Antibacterial Efficacy |
|
| |||||
| L | 4.60 × 105 | 5.7 | --- | --- | ---- |
| Ld1 | 2.98 × 101 | 1.5 | 4.2 | >99.9 | very good |
| Ld5 | 2.98 × 101 | 1.5 | 5.6 | >99.9 | very good |
| Ld10 | <2.00 × 101 | <1.3 | >5.8 | >99.9 | very good |
|
| |||||
| L | 4.60 × 105 | 5.7 | --- | --- | ---- |
| Ld1 | 1.30 × 103 | 3.1 | 4.0 | >99.9 | very good |
| Ld5 | 1.10 × 101 | 3.0 | 4.1 | >99.9 | very good |
| Ld10 | 2.56 × 101 | 1.4 | 4.3 | >99.9 | very good |
|
| |||||
| L | 1.34 × 107 | 7.1 | --- | --- | --- |
| Ld1 | 3.86 × 104 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 92.0 | satisfactory |
| Ld5 | 2.08 × 103 | 3.3 | 3.8 | >99.9 | very good |
| Ld10 | 1.32 × 103 | 3.1 | 4.0 | >99.9 | very good |
|
| |||||
| L | 1.34 × 107 | 7.1 | --- | --- | --- |
| Ld1 | 4.56 × 104 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 91.0 | satisfactory |
| Ld5 | 2.00 × 103 | 3.1 | 3.5 | >99.9 | very good |
| Ld10 | 1.21 × 103 | 2.7 | 3.7 | >99.9 | very good |
|
| |||||
| L | 1.34 × 107 | 7.1 | --- | --- | --- |
| Ld1 | 4.16 × 104 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 91.0 | satisfactory |
| Ld5 | 5.52 × 104 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 91.0 | very good |
| Ld10 | 4.08 × 103 | 4.3 | 2.8 | >99.9 | very good |
Symbols and composition of individual samples.
| Symbol Sample | Sample Composition | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PLA [g] | Birch Tar [g] | PEG [g] | |
| L | 100.0 | - | 5.0 |
| Ld1 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Ld5 | 100.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ld10 | 100.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 |
Antibacterial efficacy criteria (ISO 22196, 2011).
| Antibacterial Activity R, log | Decrease in Number | Antibacterial Efficacy |
|---|---|---|
| <1.0 | <90.0 | Poor |
| 1.0–2.0 | >90.0–99.0 | Satisfactory |
| 2.0–3.0 | >99.0–99.9 | Good |
| >3.0 | >99.9 | very good |