| Literature DB >> 35008516 |
Runa Kinitz1, Estelle Heyne2, Lauren G Koch3, Steven L Britton4, Manuela Thierbach1, Britt Wildemann1.
Abstract
Old age, adiposity, and metabolic disorders are known as risk factors for chronic tendinopathy, which is a common problem in both athletes and the general population. However, the importance of these influencing factors has not yet been well understood. This study investigated alterations in gene expression and histology of Achilles tendons of young (10 weeks) and old (100 weeks) rats bred for low (low capacity runners, LCR) and high (high capacity runners, HCR) intrinsic aerobic exercise capacity. In this rat model, LCR displayed a phenotype of reduced exercise capacity, higher body weight, and metabolic dysfunctions compared to HCR. We hypothesized that the risk factors for tendinopathy in old LCR could lead to more pronounced impairments in Achilles tendon tissue. In quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), age-related downregulation of tenocyte markers e.g., tenomodulin, genes related to matrix modeling and remodeling (e.g., collagens, elastin, biglycan, fibronectin, tenascin C) as well as transforming growth factor beta 3 (Tgfb3) have been detected. Inflammation marker cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox2) was downregulated in old rats, while microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 2 (Ptges2) was upregulated in old HCR and old LCR. In all groups, interleukin 6 (Il6), interleukin 1 beta (Il1b), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnfa) showed no significant alteration. In histological evaluation, tendons of old rats had fewer and more elongated tenocyte nuclei than young rats. Even though a higher content of glycosaminoglycans, a sign of degeneration, was found in old HCR and LCR, no further signs of tendinopathy were detectable in tendons of old rats by histological evaluation. Low intrinsic aerobic exercise capacity and the associated phenotype did not show significant effects on gene expression and tendon histology. These findings indicate that aging seems to play a prominent role in molecular and structural alterations of Achilles tendon tissue and suggests that other risk factors associated with intrinsic aerobic exercise capacity are less influential in this rat model.Entities:
Keywords: aging; inflammation; rat; tendinopathy; tendon histology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35008516 PMCID: PMC8744822 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Animal data.
| Young HCR | Old HCR | Young LCR | Old LCR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10.7 (10.2–10.9) | 98.6 (97.8–99.1) | 10.4 (10.1–10.6) | 99.4 (97.8–99.9) |
|
| 177.9 (168.3–185.0) # | 258.0 (244.5–291.8) †,## | 216.2 (196.1–230.6) | 307.6 (198.0–323.5) ‡ |
|
| 18.0 (15.5–20.0) | 30.0 (26.5–37.5) † | 18.0 (18.0–23.0) | 32.0 (30.5–33.5) ‡ |
|
| 0.34 (0.29–0.36) | 0.14 (0.11–0.14) † | 0.40 (0.38–0.41) | 0.11 (0.09–0.14) ‡ |
Data are presented as median and interquartile range (Q1-Q3). † Significant difference between old HCR and young HCR, ‡ Significant difference between old LCR and young LCR, # Significant difference between young HCR and young LCR, ## Significant difference between old HCR and old LCR.
Figure 1Normalized expression (NE) of tenocyte markers (A) tenomodulin, (B) early growth response 1, (C) scleraxis, and (D) mohawk. qRT-PCR data were normalized to the expression of the house keeping gene Rps18. Results are shown as box plots with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 2Normalized expression (NE) of tendon-associated (A,B) collagens, (C–I) other ECM modeling and remodeling genes, and (J–L) MMPs. qRT-PCR data were normalized to the expression of the house keeping gene Rps18. Results are shown as box plots with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Normalized expression (NE) of (A) transforming growth factor beta 1 and (B) beta 3. qRT-PCR data were normalized to the expression of the house keeping gene Rps18. Results are shown as box plots with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 4Normalized expression (NE) of (A,B) synthases and (C) receptor of prostaglandin E2. qRT-PCR data were normalized to the expression of the house keeping gene Rps18. Results are shown as box plots with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 5Normalized expression (NE) of (A–D) interleukins Il6, Il1b, Il33, Il1a, (E) tumor necrosis factor alpha, (F) high mobility group protein box 1 protein (Hmgb1), and (G) synthase and (H) receptor of substance P. qRT-PCR data were normalized to the expression of the house keeping gene Rps18. Results are shown as box plots with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Overview of investigated genes and significant alteration due to age.
| Regulation | Function | HCR | LCR | No Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 vs. 10 Weeks | 100 vs. 10 Weeks | |||
|
| Tenocyte markers |
|
| |
|
| ||||
| ECM modelling & remodelling |
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
| Growth factors |
|
| ||
| Inflammation & Neuroinflammation marker |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
|
| Inflammation marker |
| ||
Genes are grouped by down- and upregulation and by function. Overall, 15 genes showed downregulation in old HCR and/or LCR (highlighted blue). Genes that were downregulated in both old HCR and old LCR are displayed in the center of the column. Only Ptges2 was upregulated in old HCR and LCR (highlighted red). Not differently regulated genes are shown in the rightmost column. p ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Figure 6Evaluation of tenocyte nuclei. (A) Exemplary images of mid-portion Achilles tendon of young and old HCR and young and old LCR stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Old HCR and old LCR showed a lower cellularity and more elongated tenocyte nuclei. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Number of tenocyte nuclei, (C) circularity of tenocyte nuclei in which a value of 1 indicates a perfect circle and a value of 0 indicates a very elongated polygon, and (D) area of tenocyte nuclei in μm2. Results are shown as box plots with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 7Semi-quantitative evaluation of (A) alignment of collagen, (B) rounding of tenocyte nuclei, and (C) GAG-content. Data are given as individual dot plots with median as a line in between the data points. (D) Total modified Movin score is given as a box plot with individual data points. Significant differences between two groups are marked as a line spanning between them with the p-value displayed above. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Exemplary images of histological evaluation show an (E) abnormal amount of the appearance of GAG in old rats (HCR 100 weeks, stained yellow-green in Movat Pentachrome (MP) staining, scale bar: 250 μm) and (F) αSMA positive myofibroblasts (arrows) in young rats (HCR 10 weeks, stained red in αSMA staining, scale bar: 100 μm). Disorientated collagen in the mid portion of the same tendon was also documented (LCR 10 weeks), stained in (G) Movat Pentachrome, scale bar: 250 μm and (H) Picro Sirius Red with polarization microscopy, scale bar: 250 μm.
qPCR primers.
| Gene | Accession Number | Primer Sequence | Amplicon Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| NM_017087.1 | forward: 5′gattgagaatgggagcctga3′ | 143 |
|
| NM_053304.1 | forward: 5′tgactggaagagcggagagt3′ | 250 |
|
| NM_032085.1 | forward: 5′tgggatccaatgagggaga3′ | 135 |
|
| U03389.1 | forward: 5′agggagtctggaacattgtga3′ | 107 |
|
| NM_024129.1 | forward: 5′gcagggaatgaagggtctc3′ | 195 |
|
| NM_012551 | forward:5′cacctgaccacagagtcctttt3′ | 152 |
|
| NM_012722.1 | forward: 5′gtgtcggtcttccaggtgta3′ | 117 |
|
| NM_031825.1 | forward: 5′gtgtgaactgagcgcgaac3′ | 288 |
|
| NM_019143.2 | forward: 5′tcccacgatccgatgatgt3′ | 118 |
|
| NM_012963.2 | forward: 5′aaggggagaccaaaaagaagtt3′ | 69 |
|
| NM_017019.1 | forward: 5′atccaacccagatcagcac3′ | 76 |
|
| NM_031512.2 | forward: 5′cccattagacagctgcact3′ | 95 |
|
| NM_001014166.1 | forward: 5′gtggatgggaagaagctga3′ | 140 |
|
| M26744.1 | forward: 5′tgccttcttgggactgatg3′ | 97 |
|
| XM_017600733.1 | forward: 5′gctctaggctcgcagatgac3′ | 143 |
|
| NM_001134530.1 | forward: 5′gggtttttgaggaggaaggtg3′ | 113 |
|
| NM_133523.3 | forward: 5′cggtggcttcagtaccttt3′ | 143 |
| NM_031055.1 | forward: 5′tgctcctggctctaggctac3′ | 88 | |
|
| NM_032076.3 | forward: 5′gcgcaaggagcagaaggaga3′ | 50 |
|
| NM_001107832.1 | forward: 5′aggacggaggagatgaagt3′ | 67 |
|
| NM_001108550 | forward: 5′tagggtgtgagggagacagc3′ | 170 |
|
| NM_213557.1 | forward: 5′tgtggtgttgaggaaagcag3′ | 240 |
|
| NM_001130508.1 | Qiagen (QT01596028), no primer sequence provided | |
|
| NM_053861.1 | forward: 5′atgttccaaagagccagcaa3′ | 247 |
|
| NM_012666.2 | forward: 5′caatgcagaactacgaaagaagg3′ | 73 |
|
| NM_012667.2 | forward: 5′caaacgcaaggtggtcaaaa3′ | 94 |
|
| NM_012675.3 | forward: 5′gcctcttctcattcctgct3′ | 97 |
|
| NM_021578.2 | forward: 5′aactgtggagcaacacgtagaa3′ | 157 |
|
| NM_013174.2 | forward: 5′gagggtggaagccattagg3′ | 256 |
|
| NM_022290.1 | forward:5′ggcccgaggtatccaagaag3′ | 177 |