| Literature DB >> 35008474 |
Kamila Domińska1, Kinga Anna Urbanek2, Karolina Kowalska2, Dominika Ewa Habrowska-Górczyńska2, Marta Justyna Kozieł2, Tomasz Ochędalski1, Agnieszka Wanda Piastowska-Ciesielska2.
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent and malignant form of ovarian cancer. A local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been found in the ovary, and changes in selected components of this system were observed in pathological states and also in ovarian cancer. In the present study, we examined the effect of three peptides, Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-9) and Ang-(3-7), on proliferation and motility of the OVPA8 cell line, a new well-defined and preclinical model of HGSOC. We confirmed the presence of mRNA for all angiotensin receptors in the tested cells. Furthermore, our findings indicate that all tested angiotensin peptides increased the metabolic serum in the medium by activation of cell defense mechanisms such as nuclear factor kappaB signaling pathway andapoptosis. Moreover, tested angiotensin peptides intensified serum starvation-induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. In the case of Ang-(3-7), a significant decrease in the number of Ki67 positive cells (Ki67+) and reduced percentage of activated ERK1/2 levels in ovarian cancer cells were additionally reported. The angiotensin-induced effect of the accumulation of cells in the G0/G1 phase was not observed in OVPA8 cells growing on the medium with 10% FBS. Moreover, in the case of Ang-(3-7), the tendency was quite the opposite. Ang-(1-7) but not Ang-(1-9) or Ang-(3-7) increased the mobility of reluctant-to-migrate OVAP8 cells cultured in the serum-free medium. In any cases, the changes in the expression of VIM and HIF1A gene, associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), were not observed. In conclusion, we speculate that the adaptation to starvation in nutrient-deprived tumors can be modulated by peptides from the renin-angiotensin system. The influence of angiotensin peptides on cancer cells is highly dependent on the availability of growth factors and nutrients.Entities:
Keywords: Ang-(1-7); Ang-(1-9); Ang-(3-7); OVPA8; cell migration; cell survival; ovarian cancer; serum starvation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35008474 PMCID: PMC8744539 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The MTT Assay results following the incubation of OVPA8 cells with tested angiotensins in the medium with or without FBS (mean ± SD; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test: * p < 0.05).
Figure 2(A) The Alamar Blue Assay results, following the incubation (48 h) of ovarian cancer cells with tested angiotensins in the medium with or without FBS. (B) The Muse® Ki67 Proliferation Assay results following the incubation (48 h) of ovarian cancer cells with 0.1 nM angiotensins in the medium without FBS (mean ± SD; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test: * p < 0.05).
The fold change values for RT-qPCR results (treatment vs. control), following the incubation (48 h) of OVPA8 cells with tested angiotensins in the medium without FBS (mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test: * p < 0.05; ↓—down-regulation gene; ↑—up-regulation gene).
| Gene/Protein | Ang-(1-7) | Ang-(1-9) | Ang-(3-7) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.38 (±0.04) ↓ * | 1.26 (±0.17) | 1.7 (±0.3) | |
| 0.74 (±0.16) | 1.4 (±0.32) | 2.1 (±0.58) ↑ * | |
| 0.65 (±0.08) ↓ * | 1.7 (±0.32) | 1.9 (±0.33) ↑ * | |
| 1.00 (±0.07) | 1.06 (±0.05) | 1.18 (±0.06) | |
|
| 0.55 (±0.05) ↓ * | 0.98 (±0.05) | 0.80 (±0.06) ↓ * |
| 0.64 (±0.04) ↓ * | 1.40 (±0.18) | 1.16 (±0.12) | |
| 1.13 (±0.2) | 1.02 (±0.18) | 1.11 (±0.20) | |
| 0.84 (±0.16) | 2.56 (±0.81) | 2.91 (±0.97) ↑ * | |
|
| 1.32 (±0.19) | 0.38 (±0.11) ↓ * | 0.38 (±0.13) ↓ * |
| 0.37 (±0.09) | 2.75 (±0.80) | 1.43 (±0.58) | |
| 1.2 (±0.08) | 1.2 (±0.06) | 1.08 (±0.05) | |
| 1.11 (±0.12) | 1.8 (±0.43) | 3.12 (±0.70) ↑ * | |
| 1.07 (±0.05) | 1.03 (±0.04) | 1.15 (±0.06) | |
|
| 1.05 (±0.11) | 1.7 (±0.43) | 2.74 (±0.61) ↑ * |
| 1.12 (±0.05) | 1.04 (±0.05) | 1.07 (±0.04) | |
| 0.85 (±0.06) ↓ * | 0.90 (±0.06) | 0.92 (±0.05) | |
| 1.19 (±0.03) | 1.03 (±0.04) | 1.11 (±0.06) | |
|
| 0.70 (±0.02) ↓ * | 0.86 (±0.02) ↓ * | 0.83 (±0.03) ↓ * |
| 1.11 (±0.05) | 1.06 (±0.01) | 1.05 (±0.08) | |
| 1.65 (±0.06) ↑ * | 1.56 (±0.06) | 1.57 (±0.15) | |
| 0.99 (±0.04) | 0.91 (±0.02) | 0.93 (±0.04) | |
| 1.2 (±0.16) | 0.8 (±0.06) | 0.8 (±0.05) | |
| 0.99 (±0.12) | 0.95 (±0.01) | 0.95 (±0.04) |
Figure 3The Muse Cell Cycle Assay results following the incubation (48 h) of OVPA8 cells with tested angiotensins in the medium with or without FBS (mean ± SD; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test: * p < 0.05).
Figure 4(A) The Wound Healing Assay and (B) Boyden Chamber Assay results, following the incubation (48 h) of OVPA8 cells with tested angiotensins in the medium without FBS (mean ± SD; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test: * p < 0.05).
Figure 5The Muse® MAPK Activation Dual Detection Assay results, following the incubation (48 h) of OVPA8 cells with tested angiotensins in the medium without FBS (mean ± SD; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test: * p < 0.05).
Figure 6Western blot showing AT1R protein expression after incubation (48 h) of OVPA8 cells with tested angiotensins in the medium without FBS (mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test: * p < 0.05).