Rachel Agius1,2, Nikolai Paul Pace1, Stephen Fava3,4. 1. University of Malta Medical School, Msida, Malta. 2. Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta. 3. University of Malta Medical School, Msida, Malta. stephen.fava@um.edu.mt. 4. Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta. stephen.fava@um.edu.mt.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There are sex differences in distribution of fat and in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. We therefore sought to explore sex differences in the prevalence of adiposity-metabolic health phenotypes, in anthropometric and cardio-metabolic parameters, and in the relationship between body mass index (BMI) categories and metabolic health. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study carried out between January 2018 and June 2019, of a nationally representative sample of the Maltese Caucasian population aged 41 ± 5 years. Metabolic health was defined as presence of ≤ 1 parameter of the metabolic syndrome as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. RESULTS: Males exhibited the unhealthy metabolic phenotype more frequently than women (41.3% vs 27.8%). In total, 10.3% of normal weight men and 6.3% of normal weight women were metabolically unhealthy. Males had a higher median BMI, but a lower proportion of males exhibited an abnormally high waist circumference as compared with females. A significant difference in sex distribution was noted for each body composition phenotype. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary sample of middle-aged individuals, males were more metabolically unhealthy and more insulin resistant than their female counterparts in spite of exhibiting an abnormal waist circumference less frequently and having similar waist index. This suggests that the currently used cut-offs for normal waist circumference should be revised downwards in men. Since even normal weight men were more often metabolically unhealthy than normal weight women, BMI cut-offs may also need to be lowered in men.
OBJECTIVES: There are sex differences in distribution of fat and in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. We therefore sought to explore sex differences in the prevalence of adiposity-metabolic health phenotypes, in anthropometric and cardio-metabolic parameters, and in the relationship between body mass index (BMI) categories and metabolic health. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study carried out between January 2018 and June 2019, of a nationally representative sample of the Maltese Caucasian population aged 41 ± 5 years. Metabolic health was defined as presence of ≤ 1 parameter of the metabolic syndrome as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. RESULTS: Males exhibited the unhealthy metabolic phenotype more frequently than women (41.3% vs 27.8%). In total, 10.3% of normal weight men and 6.3% of normal weight women were metabolically unhealthy. Males had a higher median BMI, but a lower proportion of males exhibited an abnormally high waist circumference as compared with females. A significant difference in sex distribution was noted for each body composition phenotype. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary sample of middle-aged individuals, males were more metabolically unhealthy and more insulin resistant than their female counterparts in spite of exhibiting an abnormal waist circumference less frequently and having similar waist index. This suggests that the currently used cut-offs for normal waist circumference should be revised downwards in men. Since even normal weight men were more often metabolically unhealthy than normal weight women, BMI cut-offs may also need to be lowered in men.
Authors: Benjamin D Horne; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jerry M John; Aaron Weaver; Tami L Bair; Kurt R Jensen; Dale G Renlund; Joseph B Muhlestein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: K Okyay; M Yilmaz; A Yildirir; S Eroglu; E Sade; A Sahinarslan; A Aydinalp; H Muderrisoglu Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.507
Authors: Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: A Perheentupa; J Mäkinen; T Laatikainen; M Vierula; N E Skakkebaek; A-M Andersson; J Toppari Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Sara B Seidelmann; Brian Claggett; Paco E Bravo; Ankur Gupta; Hoshang Farhad; Barbara E Klein; Ronald Klein; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel B Rosoff; Katrin Charlet; Jeesun Jung; Jisoo Lee; Christine Muench; Audrey Luo; Martha Longley; Kelsey L Mauro; Falk W Lohoff Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-06-05
Authors: Diana M Thomas; Carl Bredlau; Anja Bosy-Westphal; Manfred Mueller; Wei Shen; Dympna Gallagher; Yuna Maeda; Andrew McDougall; Courtney M Peterson; Eric Ravussin; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 5.002