Eren Berber1,2, Serkan Akbulut3, Seyma Avci3, Gizem Isiktas3. 1. Departments of Endocrine, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. berbere@ccf.org. 2. General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. berbere@ccf.org. 3. Departments of Endocrine, 9500 Euclid Ave/F20, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are scant data in the literature regarding whether parathyroid autofluorescence (AF) signal patterns vary based on the etiology of hyperparathyroidism. The aim of this study was to compare AF signals of parathyroid glands across different etiologies of hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: As a prospective institutional review board-approved study between 2016 and 2019, AF intensities and heterogeneity indexes (HIs) of parathyroid glands in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy using AF were calculated and compared using Chi-square, Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney U, and logistic regression tests. RESULTS: Of the total of 183 patients, 127 patients had sporadic classic primary hyperparathyroidism, 30 patients had sporadic normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism, 10 patients had sporadic normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism, 12 patients had tertiary hyperparathyroidism, and 4 patients had familial primary hyperparathyroidism related to multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2A. There were no statistical differences in AF signals of abnormal parathyroid glands in classic, normohormonal or normocalcemic sporadic hyperparathyroidism. Parathyroid glands in patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism were similar in intensity, but more homogenous compared to those in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of AF exhibited by abnormal parathyroid glands was similar across different spectrums of primary hyperparathyroidism, in accordance with observations in the literature. However, parathyroid glands in tertiary hyperparathyroidism were more homogeneous, despite exhibiting a similar intensity of AF compared to those in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. These differences should be kept in mind when using the AF pattern as an adjunct to visual assessment in parathyroid exploration.
BACKGROUND: There are scant data in the literature regarding whether parathyroid autofluorescence (AF) signal patterns vary based on the etiology of hyperparathyroidism. The aim of this study was to compare AF signals of parathyroid glands across different etiologies of hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: As a prospective institutional review board-approved study between 2016 and 2019, AF intensities and heterogeneity indexes (HIs) of parathyroid glands in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy using AF were calculated and compared using Chi-square, Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney U, and logistic regression tests. RESULTS: Of the total of 183 patients, 127 patients had sporadic classic primary hyperparathyroidism, 30 patients had sporadic normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism, 10 patients had sporadic normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism, 12 patients had tertiary hyperparathyroidism, and 4 patients had familial primary hyperparathyroidism related to multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2A. There were no statistical differences in AF signals of abnormal parathyroid glands in classic, normohormonal or normocalcemic sporadic hyperparathyroidism. Parathyroid glands in patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism were similar in intensity, but more homogenous compared to those in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of AF exhibited by abnormal parathyroid glands was similar across different spectrums of primary hyperparathyroidism, in accordance with observations in the literature. However, parathyroid glands in tertiary hyperparathyroidism were more homogeneous, despite exhibiting a similar intensity of AF compared to those in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. These differences should be kept in mind when using the AF pattern as an adjunct to visual assessment in parathyroid exploration.