Literature DB >> 35005354

Optimizing Numeric Pain Rating Scale administration for children: The effects of verbal anchor phrases.

Megan A Young1, Bernie Carter2,3, Carl L von Baeyer4.   

Abstract

Background: The 0-10 Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS) is commonly used to obtain self-reports of pain intensity in school-age children, but there is no standard verbal descriptor to define the most severe pain. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine how verbal anchor phrases defining 10/10 on the VNRS are associated with children's reports of pain. Methods and
Results: Study 1. Children (N = 131, age 6-11) rated hypothetical pain vignettes using six anchor phrases; scores were compared with criterion ratings. Though expected effects of age and vignette were found, no effects were found for variations in anchors. Study 2. Pediatric nurses (N = 102) were asked how they would instruct a child to use the VNRS. Common themes of "the worst hurt you could ever imagine" and "the worst hurt you have ever had" to define 10/10 were identified. Study 3. Children's hospital patients (N = 27, age 8-14) rated pain from a routine injection using four versions of the VNRS. Differences in ratings ranging from one to seven points on the scale occurred in the scores of 70% of children when the top anchor phrase was changed. Common themes in children's descriptions of 10/10 pain intensity were "hurts really bad" and "hurts very much." Discussion: This research supports attention to the details of instructions that health care professionals use when administering the VNRS. Use of the anchor phrase "the worst hurt you could ever imagine" is recommended for English-speaking, school-age children. Details of administration of the VNRS should be standardized and documented in research reports and in clinical use.
© 2017 Megan A. Young, Bernie Carter, and Carl L. von Baeyer Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NRS; Numeric Rating Scale; VNRS; child; pain; pediatric; verbal anchors

Year:  2017        PMID: 35005354      PMCID: PMC8730642          DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1398587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Pain        ISSN: 2474-0527


  15 in total

1.  A normative analysis of the development of pain-related vocabulary in children.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stanford; Christine T Chambers; Kenneth D Craig
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer N Stinson; Tricia Kavanagh; Janet Yamada; Navreet Gill; Bonnie Stevens
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  An investigation of the placebo effect and age-related factors in the report of needle pain from venipuncture in children.

Authors:  B Goodenough; L Kampel; G D Champion; L Laubreaux; M K Nicholas; J B Ziegler; M McInerney
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Children's memory for painful procedures: the relationship of pain intensity, anxiety, and adult behaviors to subsequent recall.

Authors:  Melanie Noel; C Meghan McMurtry; Christine T Chambers; Patrick J McGrath
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2009-11-04

5.  Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.

Authors:  Polly E Bijur; Clarke T Latimer; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 6.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  A debate on the proposition that self-report is the gold standard in assessment of pediatric pain intensity.

Authors:  Alison Twycross; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Catherine Vincent; Linda S Franck; Carl L von Baeyer
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement.

Authors:  C L Hicks; C L von Baeyer; P A Spafford; I van Korlaar; B Goodenough
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Young children's ability to report on past, future, and hypothetical pain states: a cognitive-developmental perspective.

Authors:  Tiina Jaaniste; Melanie Noel; Carl L von Baeyer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 10.  Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elena Castarlenas; Mark P Jensen; Carl L von Baeyer; Jordi Miró
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative Education for Less Outpatient Pain after Surgery (PELOPS trial) in orthopedic patients-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mikhail Dziadzko; Axelle Bouteleux; Raphael Minjard; Jack Harich; Fanny Joubert; Pierre Pradat; Solene Pantel; Frederic Aubrun
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.728

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.