Literature DB >> 35004971

The quest for optimal and reliable guidelines based on robust evidence for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

Daniel Azoulay1, David Bomze2, Tomer Meirson3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID： 35004971      PMCID： PMC8683910          DOI： 10.21037/hbsn-21-117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN： 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: formal systematic review-based consensus methodology.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Mark R Somerfield; Thomas K Oliver; Melissa C Brouwers; Robert K Nam; Gary H Lyman; Ethan Basch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies.

Authors:  Pablo Alonso-Coello; Affan Irfan; Ivan Solà; Ignasi Gich; Mario Delgado-Noguera; David Rigau; Sera Tort; Xavier Bonfill; Jako Burgers; Holger Schunemann
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Consensus and controversies regarding follow-up after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: a synopsis of guidelines used in countries represented in the European Society of Coloproctology.

Authors:  V P Bastiaenen; I Hovdenak Jakobsen; R Labianca; A Martling; D G Morton; J N Primrose; P J Tanis; S Laurberg
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Evaluation of the current guidelines for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.

Authors:  Pascal Gavriilidis; Keith J Roberts; Alan Askari; Robert P Sutcliffe; Teh-la Huo; Po-Hong Liu; Ernest Hidalgo; Philippe Compagnon; Chetana Lim; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 5.  Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to evaluate clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Christopher J Coroneos; Sophocles H Voineskos; Sylvie D Cornacchi; Charlie H Goldsmith; Teegan A Ignacy; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Assessing the Gold Standard--Lessons from the History of RCTs.

Authors:  Laura E Bothwell; Jeremy A Greene; Scott H Podolsky; David S Jones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Systematic review of guidelines for management of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II instrument.

Authors:  Tom Holvoet; Sarah Raevens; Yves-Paul Vandewynckel; Wim Van Biesen; Karen Geboes; Hans Van Vlierberghe
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 9.  Appraisal of the current guidelines for management of cholangiocarcinoma-using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.

Authors:  Paschalis Gavriilidis; Alan Askari; Keith J Roberts; Robert P Sutcliffe
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.293
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.