| Literature DB >> 35004823 |
Shuyue Wang1, Yongxin Yu1, Mingxiao Cui1, Kehai Liu1,2, Kewu Liu3.
Abstract
Natural edible oil derived from wild non-cultivated oil crops contributed to human daily nutritional diversity and disease prevention. It was important to investigate the nutritional value of these oils and the feasibility of crop cultivation. The present study focused on the assessment of seed oil quality of Sambucus williamsii Hance (SWH) and its molecular breeding. Wild SWH seed oil was extracted by supercritical CO2 technology and the composition of the oil was determined by using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The oil content of SWH seeds reaches around 40%. Its seed oil was found to be rich in unsaturated fatty acids, such as 24.24% of linolenic acid and 50.56% of linoleic acid, and vitamin E (25.92 mg kg-1). The cytotoxicity and heavy metal analysis showed SWH seed oil was safe for consumption. In addition, the SWH strains with excellent characteristics were screened out for cultivation according to genetic diversity and morphological analysis. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers were used to evaluate the genetic diversity of 28 accessions of wild SWH seeds and 5 accessions were selected to cultivate. Among them, two strains of SWH (sample 3 and 6) with high yielding (275.7 and 266.8 area yield kg-1) were suitable for dense planting and could be used to establish the raw material forest of SWH seed oil. The results of this study indicated the potential of development of selected SWH as novel oil crops and their wide cultivation.Entities:
Keywords: Sambucus williamsii Hance; breeding; genetic diversity; nutrition; vegetable oil
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004823 PMCID: PMC8740463 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.796175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Geographic distribution of 28 Sambucus williamsii Hance (SWH) accessions. (A) map of China; (B) map of Heilongjiang province (enlarged). I-III: the first to third genetic group, colored by yellow, red, and green, respectively.
Information of the 28 Sambucus williamsii Hance (SWH) tree samples and code numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Langxiang, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 128°54′ | 47°1′ |
| 2 | Ningan, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 128°57′ | 43°51′ |
| 3 | Daqing, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 214°57′ | 46°36′ |
| 4 | Xinjiang | Compact | Bright red | 87°37′ | 43°53′ |
| 5 | Daqingchuan, Heilongjiang | Moderate | Bright red | 129°5′ | 47°1′ |
| 6 | Xiaoxinganlin, Heilongjiang | Moderate | Bright red | 128°54′ | 47°45′ |
| 7 | Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang | Moderate | Bright red | 129°37′ | 44°33′ |
| 8 | Liaoning | Open | Purple red | 123°33′ | 41°48′ |
| 9 | Hebei | Open | Bright red | 114°41′ | 38°5′ |
| 10 | Shanxi | Moderate | Bright red | 112°0′ | 38°0 |
| 11 | Anhui | Open | Bright red | 117°33′ | 32°1′ |
| 12 | Zhejiang | Moderate | Purple black | 120°20′ | 30°11′ |
| 13 | Hubei | Moderate | Purple red | 114°7′ | 30°44′ |
| 14 | Shandong | Compact | Bright red | 116°52′ | 36°21′ |
| 15 | Jiangsu | Open | Purple black | 119°1′ | 31°57′ |
| 16 | Henan | Moderate | Purple red | 114°1′ | 34°44′ |
| 17 | Sichuan | Open | Purple red | 103°42′ | 30°48′ |
| 18 | Gansu | Moderate | Bright red | 98°25′ | 39°53′ |
| 19 | Fujian | Open | Purple red | 119°9′ | 26°19′ |
| 20 | Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 127°57′ | 44°37′ |
| 21 | Tahe, Heilongjiang | Moderate | Bright red | 124°47′ | 52°20′ |
| 22 | Qiqihuaer, Heilongjiang | Moderate | Bright red | 123°44′ | 47°39′ |
| 23 | Wuyin, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 129°24′ | 47°58′ |
| 24 | Jixian, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 130°58′ | 46°44′ |
| 25 | YaBuLi, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 128°35′ | 44°56′ |
| 26 | Jiamusi, Heilongjiang | Moderate | Bright red | 131°10′ | 46°43′ |
| 27 | Jiagedaqi, Heilongjiang | Compact | Bright red | 123°53′ | 50°27′ |
| 28 | Jilin | Moderate | Purple red | 127°22′ | 44°11′ |
Fatty acids composition of SWH seed oil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tetradecanoic acid (myristic acid) | C14H28O2 | 0.36 | 95 | 15.78 |
| 2 | Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) | C16H32O2 | 16.32 | 98 | 16.21 |
| 3 | 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (linoleic acid) | C18H32O2 | 50.56 | 99 | 16.62 |
| 4 | 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid (linolenic acid) | C18H30O2 | 24.24 | 99 | 17.19 |
| 5 | 9-octadecynoic acid (stearolic acid) | C18H32O2 | 2.60 | 99 | 19.23 |
| 6 | 11,14-eicosodienoic acid (ethyl linoleate) | C20H36O2 | 1.71 | 99 | 20.72 |
| 7 | 11-eicosanoic acid (gondoic acid) | C20H38O2 | 3.71 | 99 | 21.05 |
| 8 | Arachic acid (eicosanoic acid) | C20H40O2 | 0.51 | 98 | 21.30 |
Figure 2Cytotoxicity of SWH seed oil at different concentrations in Hela cells by MTT assay.
Heavy metal contents in SWH seed oil.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Copper | 0.035 | 4 |
| Lead | 0.0386 | 1 |
| Chromium | Not detected | — |
| Zinc | 0.0769 | 5 |
| Cadmium | 0.00113 | — |
| Mercury | Not detected | 0.05 |
| Arsenic | <0.0005 | 0.51 |
Adapter sequence and primer combination.
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| EcoRI | CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC |
| AATTGGTACGCAGTCTAC | |
| MseI | GACGATGAGTCCTGAG |
| TACTCAGGACTCAT | |
|
| |
| E-A/M-C | GACTGCGTACCAATTCA |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAAC | |
| E-AAC/M-CAC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAC |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAC | |
| E-AAC/M-CAG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAC |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAG | |
| E-AAC/M-CTC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAC |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTC | |
| E-AAG/M-CAC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAG |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAC | |
| E-AAG/M-CAG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAG |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAG | |
| E-ACA/M-CAG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCACA |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAG | |
| E-ACA/M-CTC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCACA |
| GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTC |
Figure 3Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) profiles of 28 SWH accessions as revealed by 8 AFLP primer. Combinations. ①E-AAC/MCAC; ②E-AAC/M-CAG; ③E-AAC/M-CTC; ④E-AAG/M-CAC; ⑤E-AAG/M-CAG; ⑥E-ACA/M-CAG; ⑦E-ACA/M-CTC; ⑧E-ACG/M-CAC; Lane M stands for molecular weight marker.
The number of polymorphic bands of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprints.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| AAC/CAC | 83 | 79 | 95.2 |
| AAC/CAG | 103 | 102 | 99 |
| AAC/CTC | 90 | 89 | 98.9 |
| AAG/CAC | 98 | 98 | 100 |
| AAG/CAG | 104 | 104 | 100 |
| ACA/CAG | 69 | 67 | 97.1 |
| ACA/CTC | 76 | 75 | 98.7 |
| ACG/CAC | 82 | 80 | 97.6 |
| Average | 88.1 | 86.75 | 98.4 |
| Sum | 705 | 694 | 98.4 |
Figure 4(A) Scatter diagram of principal component analysis (PCA) and (B) cluster analysis (B) of the AFLP results for 28 SWH accessions. I-III: the first to third genetic group, colored by yellow, red, and green, respectively.
Main excellent characters of selected excellent samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | Compact | Bright red | Neat and beautiful |
| 6 | 4 | Moderate | Bright red | Neat and beautiful |
| 14 | 4 | Compact | Bright red | Neat and beautiful |
| 20 | 4 | Compact | Bright red | Neat and beautiful |
| 27 | 4 | Compact | Bright red | Neat and beautiful |
The phenotypic of selected samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2.77 | 4.33 | 1.24 | 12 | 17.5 | 0.63 | Compact, upright |
| 6 | 2.68 | 3.60 | 1.2 | 10 | 15.1 | 0.65 | Compact, upright |
| 14 | 2.62 | 3.09 | 1.15 | 7 | 13.5 | 0.64 | Compact, upright |
| 20 | 2.44 | 3.2 | 1.23 | 5 | 14.2 | 0.64 | Half open |
| 27 | 2.35 | 3.1 | 1.21 | 6 | 13.0 | 0.61 | Compact, upright |
Growth date of selected samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 3 | 19/3 | 24/3 | 15/4 | 29/4 | 1/5 | 8/5 | 17/7 | 1/10 | 192 |
| 6 | 20/3 | 26/3 | 16/4 | 29/4 | 3/5 | 10/5 | 20/7 | 5/10 | 195 |
| 14 | 21/3 | 25/3 | 18/4 | 28/4 | 5/5 | 9/5 | 22/7 | 3/10 | 192 |
| 20 | 20/3 | 24/3 | 16/4 | 29/4 | 1/5 | 11/5 | 25/7 | 8/10 | 197 |
| 27 | 22/3 | 26/3 | 18/4 | 28/4 | 4/5 | 12/5 | 27/7 | 6/10 | 194 |
Yield factors and yield of superior tree comparative test lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| 3 | 4 | 48 | 1,354 | 6.16 | 1.24 | 0.62 | 275.7 |
| 6 | 4 | 36 | 1,082 | 4.32 | 1.2 | 0.60 | 266.8 |
| 14 | 4 | 48 | 1,336 | 4.88 | 1.15 | 0.53 | 235.7 |
| 20 | 4 | 48 | 1,161 | 4.64 | 1.23 | 0.47 | 209 |
| 27 | 4 | 42 | 1,085 | 4.34 | 1.21 | 0.51 | 226.8 |
| Average | 4 | 44.4 | 1203.6 | 4.868 | 1.206 | 0.546 | 242.8 |
| Control group | 4 | 48 | 1,211 | 4.32 | 1.32 | 0.41 | 182.3 |
Crown projection yield of selected samples.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 3 | 0.625a ± 0.018 |
| 6 | 0.596a ± 0.008 |
| 14 | 0.536b ± 0.016 |
| 20 | 0.508b ± 0.017 |
| 27 | 0.4667c ± 0.003 |
| Control group | 0.415d ± 0.008 |
Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).