| Literature DB >> 35004557 |
Qian Lin1, Bin Deng2, Jia Rui2, Song-Bai Guo3, Qingqing Hu4, Qiuping Chen5,6, Chi Tang7, Lina Zhou8, Zeyu Zhao1,5, Shengnan Lin2, Yuanzhao Zhu2, Meng Yang2, Yao Wang2, Jingwen Xu2, Xingchun Liu2, Tianlong Yang2, Peihua Li2, Zhuoyang Li2, Li Luo2, Weikang Liu2, Chan Liu2, Jiefeng Huang2, Min Yao9, Mengni Nong9, Liping Nong9, Jinglan Wu9, Na Luo9, Shihai Chen7, Roger Frutos6, Shixiong Yang9, Qun Li10, Jing-An Cui3, Tianmu Chen2.
Abstract
Background: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a single-stranded RNA virus that can weaken the body's cellular and humoral immunity and is a serious disease without specific drug management and vaccine. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiologic characteristics and transmissibility of HIV.Entities:
Keywords: acquired immune deficiency syndrome; dynamics; human immunodeficiency virus; transmissibility; transmission model
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004557 PMCID: PMC8733253 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Variables and definition of the structure of the HIV transmission dynamics model.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| S | Susceptible population |
| E | Exposed population |
| I | Untested HIV-infected |
| T1 | Tested HIV-infected |
| T2 | Tested AIDS patient |
| D1 | Dead of HIV infection in tested HIV-infected |
| D2 | Dead of HIV infection in tested AIDS patient |
Figure 1The structure of HIV transmission dynamics model.
Definition and value of parameters in HIV transmission dynamics model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | HIV transmissibility | – | – | – | Model fitting |
|
| Proportion of the HIV- infected | 0–0.46 | 1 | 0.4–0.52 | Data collection |
| ω | Latent period | 0.94 | Months | 0.47–2.8 | References ( |
| κ1 | Transmissibility coefficient of the HIV-infected | 0.1 | 1 | – | Hypothesis |
| κ2 | Transmissibility coefficient of AIDS patients | 0.9 | 1 | – | Hypothesis |
| α | Period from onset time to diagnosis as the HIV-infected | 0.47 | Months | 0–200 | Data collection |
| δ | Period from onset time to diagnosis as the AIDS patients | 54.47 | Months | 0–254 | Data collection and Reference ( |
|
| Fatality rate of the HIV-infected | 0.035 | 1 | 0.00059–0.06060 | Data collection |
|
| Fatality rate of AIDS patients | 0.033 | 1 | 0.00676–0.04540 | Data collection |
|
| Birth rate | 0.00081 | 1 | 0.00047–0.00127 | Statistical Yearbook of Nanning City |
|
| Death rate | 0.00021 | 1 | 0.00011–0.00047 | Statistical Yearbook of Nanning City |
The value of parameters of br, dr, f1, f2 and p in detail.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| January 2001 to March 2005 | 0.000637 | 1 |
| April 2005 to April 2011 | 0.001159 | 1 | |
| May 2011 to December 2019 | 0.000693 | 1 | |
|
| January 2001 to March 2005 | 0.000226 | 1 |
| April 2005 to April 2011 | 0.000326 | 1 | |
| May 2011 to December 2019 | 0.000157 | 1 | |
|
| January 2001 to March 2005 | 0.057143 | 1 |
| April 2005 to April 2011 | 0.046396 | 1 | |
| May 2011 to December 2019 | 0.012909 | 1 | |
|
| January 2001 to March 2005 | 0.040650 | 1 |
| April 2005 to April 2011 | 0.038671 | 1 | |
| May 2011 to December 2019 | 0.029299 | 1 | |
|
| January 2001 to March 2005 | 0.44 | 1 |
| April 2005 to April 2011 | 0.39 | 1 | |
| May 2011 to December 2019 | 0.49 | 1 |
Figure 2The number of cases and incidence rate of HIV in Nanning from 2001 to 2020.
Figure 3The number of deaths and fatality rate of HIV in Nanning for twenty years.
Figure 4The distribution by place of HIV in Nanning for 20 years (The signal of the red point represents the site of Nanning city in China).
Figure 5The distribution by sex of HIV in Nanning from 2001 to 2019.
The distribution by people of HIV in three stages in Nanning from January 2001 to May 2020.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sex | 614 | 100.00% | 5,652 | 100.00% | 16,431 | 100.00% |
| Male | 518 | 84.36% | 4,088 | 72.33% | 11,846 | 12,304 |
| Female | 96 | 15.64% | 1,564 | 27.67% | 3,996 | 4,127 |
| Matrimony | 614 | 100.00% | 5,652 | 100.00% | 16,431 | 100.00% |
| Married | 190 | 30.94% | 3,551 | 62.83% | 9,122 | 55.52% |
| Unmarried | 221 | 35.99% | 1,277 | 22.59% | 4,132 | 25.15% |
| Divorced or widowed | 38 | 6.19% | 606 | 10.72% | 3,157 | 19.21% |
| Unknow | 165 | 26.87% | 218 | 3.86% | 20 | 0.12% |
| Age | 614 | 100.00% | 5,652 | 100.00% | 16,431 | 100.00% |
| < 1 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.01% |
| 1– | 2 | 0.33% | 49 | 0.87% | 41 | 0.25% |
| 10– | 15 | 2.44% | 46 | 0.81% | 208 | 1.27% |
| 20– | 235 | 38.27% | 1,054 | 18.65% | 2,218 | 13.50% |
| 30– | 245 | 39.90% | 1,676 | 29.65% | 2,567 | 15.62% |
| 40– | 87 | 14.17% | 979 | 17.32% | 2,828 | 17.21% |
| 50– | 22 | 3.58% | 666 | 11.78% | 3,029 | 18.43% |
| 60– | 5 | 0.81% | 629 | 11.13% | 3,429 | 20.87% |
| 70– | 3 | 0.49% | 481 | 8.51% | 1,826 | 11.11% |
| 80– | 0 | 0.00% | 71 | 1.26% | 273 | 1.66% |
| 90– | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.02% | 10 | 0.06% |
| >100 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Occupation | 614 | 100.00% | 5,652 | 100.00% | 16,431 | 100.00% |
| Technicist | 207 | 33.71% | 1,210 | 21.41% | 2,291 | 13.94% |
| Farmar | 121 | 19.71% | 2,755 | 48.74% | 10,183 | 61.97% |
| Civilian staff | 13 | 2.12% | 117 | 2.07% | 327 | 1.99% |
| Business services | 29 | 4.72% | 212 | 3.75% | 640 | 3.90% |
| Student | 4 | 0.65% | 78 | 1.38% | 486 | 2.96% |
| Worker | 21 | 3.42% | 421 | 7.45% | 612 | 3.72% |
| Military | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Unclassified | 219 | 35.67% | 849 | 15.02% | 1,892 | 11.51% |
| Degree of education | 399 | 64.98% | 5,432 | 96.11% | 16,431 | 100.00% |
| Junior college and above | 10 | 1.63% | 224 | 3.96% | 1,817 | 11.06% |
| High school | 23 | 3.75% | 561 | 9.93% | 1,748 | 10.64% |
| Junior high school | 267 | 43.49% | 2,438 | 43.14% | 5,624 | 34.23% |
| Primary school | 93 | 15.15% | 1,894 | 33.51% | 6,462 | 39.33% |
| Illiteracy | 6 | 0.98% | 315 | 5.57% | 780 | 4.75% |
Stage 1: rapid growth period (from January 2001 to March 2005); Stage 2: slow growth period (from April 2005 to April 2011); Stage 3: the plateau (from May 2011 to December 2019).
The difference in the composition ratio of the factors at different stages is statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Figure 6Time of diagnosis in different years and stages. (A) The diagnosis time changes from 2001 to 2020; (B) the diagnosis time changes in different stages.
Figure 7Parameter of f1, f2, and p in three stages. (A) The fatality rate of HIV-infected (f1) in different stages; (B) the fatality rate of AIDS patient (f2) in different stages; (C) the proportion of HIV-infected (p) in different stages.
Figure 8The Susceptible-Exposed-Untested HIV infection-Tested HIV infection-Dead (SEITD) model fitting result of HIV reported data of 2001–2019 in Nanning City.
Figure 9The result of simulation prevention and control effect of HIV in Nanning during the twenty years. (A) The result of the model fitted and different stage in the development of HIV, Rapid growth period: from January 2001 to March 2005; Slow growth period; from April 2005 to April 2011; Plateau: from May 2011 to December 2019; (B) the result of the simulated trend by using the transmissibility of rapid growth period without interventions; (C) the result of the simulated trend by using the transmissibility of slow growth period in the condition of without interventions in the second stage but taking interventions in the rapid growth period.
Figure 10The sensitivity analysis of κ1 (*κ1: transmissibility coefficient of the HIV-infected, κ1 + κ2 = 1).