| Literature DB >> 35004503 |
Fajar Maulinda1, Dwini Handayani2, Turro S Wongkaren3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of a woman's age at first marriage (AFM) on the incidence of labor complications and babies with low birth weight (LBW).Entities:
Keywords: Labor complications; Low birth weight; Marriage
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004503 PMCID: PMC8650910 DOI: 10.4094/chnr.2021.27.2.127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Child Health Nurs Res ISSN: 2287-9110
Distribution of Variables in the Analysis of Labor Complications (N=4,561)
| Variables | Categories | n (%) or M±SD | Min-Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labor complications | No | 1,066 (23.4) | |
| Yes | 3,495 (76.6) | ||
| AFM | 21.7±4.5 | 10-42 | |
| <20 | 1,602 (35.1) | ||
| 20-34 | 2,897 (63.5) | ||
| ≥35 | 62 (1.4) | ||
| Education (year) | 10.4±4.3 | 0-18 | |
| Level of education | University | 1,060 (23.2) | |
| High school | 1,809 (39.7) | ||
| No school or only primary | 1,692 (37.1) | ||
| Economic status | Highest (20%) | 797 (17.5) | |
| Middle (40%) | 1,815 (39.8) | ||
| Lowest (40%) | 1,949 (42.7) | ||
| History of pregnancy complications | No | 3,867 (84.8) | |
| Yes | 694 (15.2) | ||
| Pregnancy status | Planned | 4,306 (94.4) | |
| Mistimed | 228 (5.0) | ||
| Unwanted | 27 (0.6) | ||
| Discussion about delivery preparations | No | 262 (5.7) | |
| Yes | 4,299 (94.3) | ||
| Problems accessing health services | No | 2,973 (65.2) | |
| Yes | 1,588 (34.8) | ||
| Knowledge of dangers and complications | No | 1,685 (36.9) | |
| Yes | 2,876 (63.1) | ||
| Frequency of ANC visits | Routine (≥4) | 4,236 (92.9) | |
| Not routine (<4) | 325 (7.1) | ||
| Maternity assistant | Medical | 4,517 (99.0) | |
| Non-medical | 44 (1.0) |
AFM, age at first marriage; ANC, antenatal care; Max, maximum; Min, minimum.
Distribution of Variables in the Analysis of Low Birth Weight Babies (N=4,593)
| Variables | Categories | n (%) or M±SD | Min-Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| LBW babies | No | 4,187 (91.2) | |
| Yes | 406 (8.8) | ||
| AFM | 21.7±4.5 | 10-42 | |
| <20 | 1,639 (35.7) | ||
| 20-34 | 2,891 (62.9) | ||
| ≥35 | 63 (1.4) | ||
| Education (year) | 10.4±4.3 | 0-18 | |
| Level of education | University | 1,058 (23.1) | |
| High School | 1,816 (39.5) | ||
| No school or only primary | 1,719 (37.4) | ||
| Economic status | Not poor | 2,611 (56.9) | |
| Poor | 1,982 (43.1) | ||
| Intake of iron pills | ≥90 Tablets | 1,935 (42.1) | |
| <90 Tablets | 2,658 (57.9) | ||
| History of pregnancy complications | No | 3,910 (85.1) | |
| Yes | 683 (14.9) | ||
| Pregnancy status | Planned | 4,331 (94.3) | |
| Mistimed | 231 (5.0) | ||
| Unwanted | 31 (0.7) | ||
| Problems accessing health services | No | 2,994 (65.2) | |
| Yes | 1,599 (34.8) | ||
| Frequency of ANC visits | Routine (≥4) | 4,195 (91.3) | |
| Not routine (<4) | 398 (8.7) | ||
| Smoker | No | 4,534 (98.7) | |
| Yes | 59 (1.3) |
AFM, age at first marriage; ANC, antenatal care; LBW, low birth weight; Max, maximum; Min, minimum.
Results of Binary Logistic Regression for Labor Complications
| Characteristics | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| OR |
|
|
| OR |
| 95% CI | |
| AFM | -.01 | -1.01 | 0.99 | .311 | -.04 | -1.99 | 0.96 | .047 | 0.92-0.99 |
| AFM * economic status (ref: highest) | |||||||||
| Middle | .04 | 1.91 | 1.04 | .056 | 0.99-1.09 | ||||
| Lowest | .05 | 2.10 | 1.05 | .036 | 1.00-1.10 | ||||
| Economic status (ref: highest) | |||||||||
| Middle | -.70 | -1.25 | 0.49 | .210 | 0.16-1.48 | ||||
| Lowest | -.82 | -1.49 | 0.44 | .137 | 0.15-1.30 | ||||
| Education | -.00 | -0.03 | 0.99 | .977 | 0.98-1.02 | ||||
| History of pregnancy complications (ref: no) | |||||||||
| Yes | .52 | 4.68 | 1.68 | <.001 | 1.35-2.09 | ||||
| Pregnancy status (ref: planned) | |||||||||
| Mistimed | .19 | 1.10 | 1.21 | .273 | 0.86-1.71 | ||||
| Unwanted | -.44 | -1.02 | 0.64 | .308 | 0.27-1.50 | ||||
| Problems accessing health services (ref: no) | |||||||||
| Yes | .16 | 2.15 | 1.18 | .032 | 1.01-1.37 | ||||
| Knowledge of dangers and complications (ref: no) | |||||||||
| Yes | .05 | 0.72 | 1.06 | .469 | 0.91-1.22 | ||||
| Discussion about delivery preparations (ref: yes) | |||||||||
| No | -.41 | -2.80 | 0.67 | .005 | 0.50-0.88 | ||||
| Frequency of ANC visits (ref: routine) | |||||||||
| Not routine (<4) | .48 | 3.00 | 1.61 | .003 | 1.17-2.19 | ||||
| Maternity assistant (ref: medical) | |||||||||
| Non-medical | -.43 | -1.32 | 0.65 | .186 | 0.34-1.23 | ||||
| Pseudo-R2 =0.0147 | |||||||||
AFM, age at first marriage; ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ref, reference.
Results of Probit Regression for the Incidence of Low Birth Weight Babies
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| dy/dx |
|
|
| dy/dx |
| 95% CI | |
| AFM | -.16 | -4.38 | -0.025 | <.001 | -.11 | -2.92 | -0.017 | .004 | -0.03-0.01 |
| Quadratic AFM | .00 | 4.13 | 0.000 | <.001 | .00 | 2.95 | 0.000 | .003 | 0.00-0.00 |
| Education | -.01 | -1.03 | -0.001 | .305 | -0.00-0.00 | ||||
| Economic status (ref: not poor) | |||||||||
| Poor | .12 | 2.14 | 0.019 | .034 | 0.00-0.04 | ||||
| Intake of iron pills (ref:≥90 tablet) | |||||||||
| <90 Tablets | .05 | 0.95 | 0.008 | .337 | -0.00-0.03 | ||||
| History of pregnancy complications (ref: no) | |||||||||
| Yes | .33 | 4.78 | 0.059 | <.001 | 0.03-0.09 | ||||
| Pregnancy status (ref: planned) | |||||||||
| Mistimed | -.07 | -0.60 | -0.010 | .529 | -0.04-0.02 | ||||
| Unwanted | .10 | 0.36 | 0.017 | .736 | -0.08-0.11 | ||||
| Problems accessing health services (ref: no) | |||||||||
| Yes | .07 | 1.18 | 0.010 | .245 | -0.01-0.03 | ||||
| Frequency of ANC visits (ref: routine) | |||||||||
| Not routine (<4) | .53 | 6.50 | 0.107 | <.001 | 0.07-0.15 | ||||
| Smoker (ref: no) | |||||||||
| Yes | -.07 | -0.29 | -0.010 | .759 | -0.07-0.05 | ||||
| Pseudo-R2=0.0368 | |||||||||
AFM, age at first marriage; ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; dy/dx, marginal effect; ref, reference.
Figure 1.Birth probability pattern of low birth weight babies according to age at first marriage. AFM, age of first marriage; LBW, low birth weight.