| Literature DB >> 35004494 |
Hyo Sin Choi1, Kyung Eun Lee2, Yeonghee Shin3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT)-based emotional regulation program for mothers of premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Mother; Neonatal intensive care units; Premature infants
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004494 PMCID: PMC8650872 DOI: 10.4094/chnr.2021.27.1.24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Child Health Nurs Res ISSN: 2287-9110
Composition and Operation of the Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy–based Emotion Regulation Program for Mothers of Premature Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
| Session | Topic | Goals | Dissonance technique | Program details | Media |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Building intimacy | Understanding the program goals | Cognitive dispute |
Intro: Introduction of presider and participants Activities - Sharing feelings after seeing child in the NICU and emotions after giving birth (situational, cognitive, and emotional expressions) - Explanation of program goals and introduction of REBT Closing: Writing of pledge and pretest survey |
- Pretest questionnaire - Pledge - Workbook |
| 2 | Exploring negative emotions | Identifying negative emotions and understanding cognitive processes | Cognitive dispute |
Intro: Presentation of cases involving negative events and inappropriate negative emotions (stress, anxiety, and depression) Activities: - Write event-emotion record logs - Use pictures and text to express how strongly inappropriate negative emotions are felt - Learn about the importance of cognition - Differentiation between cognition and emotion Closing: Task after explaining cognition record log (event, emotion, and automatic thought) |
- Workbook (emotional terms) |
| 3 | Examining the causes of negative emotions (1) | Understanding cognitive distortion and irrational beliefs | Cognitive dispute |
Intro: Detailed explanation about types of cognitive distortion Activities: - Think about cognitive distortions I use - Practice cognitive reconstruction - Differentiate between irrational and rational beliefs Closing: Read 11 irrational beliefs, task of finding ones that apply to oneself |
- Workbook |
| 4 | Examining the causes of negative emotions (2) | Identifying one’s own irrational beliefs | Cognitive dispute |
Intro: Introduction of cases involving irrational beliefs Activities: - Finding one’s own irrational beliefs related to giving birth to a premature infant (self-blame, other-blame, rumination, and catastrophizing) - Identifying effects of irrational beliefs on emotions - Practice re-interpretation of situational, cognitive, and emotional processes Closing: Explanation of how to write emotional diary (1) and task |
- Workbook |
| 5 | Correcting the causes of negative emotions (1) | Finding rational alternative beliefs | Cognitive and emotional dispute |
Intro: Examples of dissonance for irrational beliefs (dissonance based on logic, reality, and practicality) Activities: - Re-interpretation of situational, cognitive, and emotional processes - Practice dissonance for one’s own irrational beliefs - Learn skills to rationally express situational, cognitive, and emotional processes Closing: Read 11 rational alternative beliefs, task of repeatedly practicing rational coping statements |
- Workbook |
| 6 | Correcting the causes of negative emotions (2) | Identifying the emotional consequences of irrational/rational beliefs | Cognitive and emotional dispute |
Intro: Examples of rational coping statements for beliefs that cause stress, depression, and anxiety and sharing one’s own coping statements Activities: - Compare one’s own emotional consequences as a result of irrational beliefs to emotional consequences when changed to rational beliefs - Understand and apply rational emotive imagery technique for a recent event that caused negative emotions Closing: Explanation of how to write emotional diary (2) and task |
- Workbook |
| 7 | Training for applying to daily life | Understand the relationship between cognition and emotion and how to apply it to daily life | Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dispute |
Intro: Sharing emotional diary cases about events that caused negative emotions after giving birth Activities: - Act out situations that could trigger negative emotions related to giving birth to a premature infant - Role playing: Practice how to cope with irrational beliefs - Complement each other for changing to appropriate emotions and exchange opinions Closing: Apply to daily life according to rational beliefs/explanation of method for behavioral re-enforcement according to rational beliefs and task |
- Workbook |
| 8 | Closing | Positive self-statements through confirmation of changes | Cognitive and behavioral dispute |
Intro: Write a letter complimenting oneself Activities: - Discuss changes that have occurred after participating in the program and making pledges Closing: Presentation of certificate of completion, posttest survey, and program satisfaction survey consisting of subjective statements |
- Workbook - Certificate of completion - Review - Posttest survey - Satisfaction survey |
NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; REBT, rational emotive behavior therapy.
General Characteristics of Participants and Homogeneity Testing (N=38)
| Variables | Characteristics | Categories | Total (n=38) | Exp. (n=17) | Cont. (n=21) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| n (%) or M±SD | n (%) or M±SD | n (%) or M±SD | |||||
| Maternal | Age (year) | 32.5±3.6 | 32.9±3.7 | 32.1±3.5 | 0.78 | .434 | |
| Education level | High school | 9 (23.7) | 2 (11.8) | 7 (33.3) | 2.42 | .148 | |
| College or above | 29 (76.3) | 15 (88.2) | 14 (66.7) | ||||
| Employment status | Employed | 3 (7.9) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (9.5) | 1.37 | .312 | |
| On temporary leave | 9 (23.7) | 7 (41.2) | 2 (9.5) | ||||
| Unemployed | 26 (68.4) | 9 (52.9) | 17 (81.0) | ||||
| Monthly income (10,000 won) | ≤200 | 3 (7.9) | 1 (5.8) | 2 (9.5) | 0.02 | .882 | |
| ≥200 & ≤300 | 17 (44.7) | 8 (47.1) | 9 (42.9) | ||||
| >300 | 18 (47.4) | 8 (47.1) | 10 (47.6) | ||||
| Postpartum care | Yes | 13 (34.2) | 7 (41.2) | 6 (28.6) | 0.66 | .502 | |
| No | 25 (65.8) | 10 (58.8) | 15 (71.4) | ||||
| Planned pregnancy | Yes | 30 (78.9) | 12 (70.6) | 18 (85.7) | 1.29 | .426 | |
| No | 8 (21.1) | 5 (29.4) | 3 (14.3) | ||||
| Delivery type | Natural delivery | 8 (21.1) | 5 (29.4) | 3 (14.3) | 1.29 | .426 | |
| Cesarean section | 30 (78.9) | 12 (70.6) | 18 (85.7) | ||||
| Disease during pregnancy | Yes | 24 (63.2) | 13 (76.5) | 11 (52.4) | 2.34 | .181 | |
| No | 14 (36.8) | 4 (23.5) | 10 (47.6) | ||||
| Mood during pregnancy | Happy | 14 (36.8) | 3 (17.6) | 11 (52.4) | 2.54 | .111 | |
| Average | 16 (42.1) | 10 (58.9) | 6 (28.6) | ||||
| Depressed | 8 (21.1) | 4 (23.5) | 4 (19.0) | ||||
| Feeding | Breastfeeding | 16 (42.1) | 5 (29.4) | 11 (52.4) | 2.64 | .154 | |
| Mixed feeding with baby formula | 22 (57.9) | 12 (70.6) | 10 (47.6) | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Premature infant | Sex | Male | 24 (63.2) | 12 (70.6) | 12 (57.1) | 0.73 | .506 |
| Female | 14 (36.8) | 5 (29.4) | 9 (42.9) | ||||
| Birth order | First-born | 23 (60.5) | 11 (64.7) | 12 (57.1) | 0.28 | .595 | |
| Later-born | 15 (39.5) | 6 (35.3) | 9 (42.9) | ||||
| Gestational age (day) | 215.2±13.3 | 211.4±10.4 | 218.4±14.6 | 1.73 | .083 | ||
| Birth weight (g) | 1,522.9±338.3 | 1,457.1±323.2 | 1,576.2±348.5 | 0.94 | .347 | ||
| Ventilator care | Yes | 33 (86.8) | 15 (88.2) | 18 (85.7) | 0.05 | >.999 | |
| No | 5 (13.2) | 2 (11.8) | 3 (14.3) | ||||
Fisher’s exact test;
Linear-by-linear association;
Cont., control group; Exp., experimental group.
Homogeneity Testing of Pretest Dependent Variables (N=38)
| Variables | Total (n=38) | Exp. (n=17) | Cont. (n=21) | z |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| M±SD | M±SD | M±SD | |||
| Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation | 34.11±10.45 | 34.12±9.85 | 34.10±11.15 | 0.07 | .941 |
|
| |||||
| Stress | 82.61±9.25 | 80.12±9.56 | 84.62±8.70 | 1.50 | .133 |
|
| |||||
| State anxiety | 51.11±8.49 | 52.65±9.03 | 49.86±8.03 | 0.94 | .346 |
|
| |||||
| Postpartum depression | 12.32±6.06 | 12.53±6.60 | 12.14±5.74 | 0.15 | .883 |
Cont., control group; Exp., experimental group.
Comparison of Outcome Variables between the Two Groups (N=38)
| Variables | Groups | Pretest | Posttest | z |
| Amount of change | z |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation | Exp. (n=17) | 34.12±9.85 | 23.82±4.38 | −3.30 | .001 | −10.29±8.24 | −3.88 | <.001 |
| Cont. (n=21) | 34.10±11.15 | 37.05±12.85 | −1.27 | .200 | 2.95±9.40 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Stress | Exp. (n=17) | 80.12±9.56 | 64.76±9.75 | −3.41 | .001 | −15.35±11.89 | −2.76 | .006 |
| Cont. (n=21) | 84.62±8.70 | 79.80±8.27 | −2.66 | .008 | −4.81±6.72 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| State anxiety | Exp. (n=17) | 52.65±9.03 | 38.24±6.21 | −3.52 | <.001 | −14.41±10.81 | −3.72 | <.001 |
| Cont. (n=21) | 49.86±8.03 | 50.76±10.89 | −0.54 | .591 | 0.90±8.87 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Postpartum depression | Exp. (n=17) | 12.53±6.60 | 7.06±3.44 | −2.93 | .003 | −5.48±5.86 | −2.62 | .009 |
| Cont. (n=21) | 12.14±5.74 | 11.86±3.81 | −0.36 | .722 | −0.29±4.71 | |||
Cont., control group; Exp., experimental group.