Intra-articular lipomas are very rare and painless, but if they interfere with our daily activities, the removal should be considered.
Introduction
Lipoma is a frequent benign tumor of the soft tissue [1]. There are two types of lipomas, true lipoma and lipoma arborescens. Basically, intra-articular true lipoma is so rare, with only dozens of cases reported in the literature up to now [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Clinically, most of the patients with intra-articular lipoma are asymptomatic, some show as pressure symptoms caused by mass lesions, such as locking, kneeling pain, and so on. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential modality to suggest the diagnosis preoperatively [2, 3, 4, 5]. The curative treatment of intra-articular lipoma is removal. If possible, arthroscopic removal is minimally invasive and is desirable. Here, we present the clinical case of a female patient with an intra-articular lipoma in her knee.Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case report and any accompanying images.
Case Report
A 56-year-old female was referred to our hospital from another orthopedic clinic with a soft-tissue mass on her right knee without cause. She had no particular medical history, family history, or trauma history. She noticed the mass 8 months earlier. The mass gradually grew in size and deep flexion became uncomfortable. She felt no pain and had no limitation of activities. She felt that something like a mass went in and out as the knee moved in her right knee.On examination, the right knee was found to be swollen, especially at lateral recess. The mass was soft, non-tender, no localized temperature increase, and no joint effusion. Moreover, it was highly mobile and had no adhesions to its surroundings. The range of knee motion was 0–140, although it hurt a little at maximum flexion. There was no evidence of muscular atrophy or instability of the knee joint.The results of blood tests were essentially normal. X-ray findings of the right knee joint showed no abnormalities. No osteoarthritic change or bone erosion was present. A soft-tissue shadow was not seen (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Anteroposterior radiograph of the right knee joint showing no abnormalities except for soft-tissue swelling.
Anteroposterior radiograph of the right knee joint showing no abnormalities except for soft-tissue swelling.MRI showed an oval-shaped mass of low to high heterogeneous signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images at the lateral joint space. Low signal intensity was observed in the fat suppression image (Fig. 2). Therefore, a tumor derived from adipose tissue with fibrous component is suspected.
Figure 2
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lesion. (a) T1-weighted coronal image (TR 400, TE 7.4). (b) T2-weighted coronal image (TR 4484, TE 89), (c) T2-weighted fat-suppressed coronal image (TR 4893, TE 91), (d) T2-weighted axial image (TR 4075, TE 88).
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lesion. (a) T1-weighted coronal image (TR 400, TE 7.4). (b) T2-weighted coronal image (TR 4484, TE 89), (c) T2-weighted fat-suppressed coronal image (TR 4893, TE 91), (d) T2-weighted axial image (TR 4075, TE 88).The mass was 5 cm × 4 cm × 2 cm in size. No contrast agent used.As a differential diagnosis of adipose-derived soft-tissue tumor, true lipoma, lipoma arborescens, and liposarcoma can be considered. The patient subsequently underwent an operative arthroscopy.First, the inside of the knee joint was carefully checked with an arthroscope. Mild degeneration of the lateral meniscus was observed. No other abnormalities such as synovial proliferation and cartilage lesion were seen. A large mass was found in the lateral recess.It was soft, mobile and had no adhesion to its surroundings. It was too large to be removed endoscopically.An arthrotomy was made by a lateral parapatellar incision of about 4 cm. An ovoid soft-tissue mass wrapped in a white capsule appeared. The mass was not adhesive to its surroundings and was mobile. The mass had a stalk that was connected to the anterolateral joint capsule near the lateral fat pad.On excision of the stalk, the mass was easily removed (Fig. 3). When the mass was cut and opened, the inside looked like adipose tissue.
Figure 3
(a) Intraoperative photo at the time of removal. (b) Tumor after removal with ruler for scale.
(a) Intraoperative photo at the time of removal. (b) Tumor after removal with ruler for scale.Histologically, the synovium of the joint capsule shows angiogenesis and mild inflammatory cell infiltration. There was no contradiction as a true lipoma occurred in the knee joint, and no particular malignant findings are observed (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Microphotograph showing the histologic appearance of the lesion. (a) The tumor is mainly composed of mature adipocytes (×10), (b) The synovium of the joint capsule shows angiogenesis and mild inflammatory cell infiltration (×10).
Microphotograph showing the histologic appearance of the lesion. (a) The tumor is mainly composed of mature adipocytes (×10), (b) The synovium of the joint capsule shows angiogenesis and mild inflammatory cell infiltration (×10).Eight months after the operation, there is no recurrence and no particular abnormality. She is doing well with no symptoms and no range of motion restrictions.
Discussion
Lipomas are the most common type of soft-tissue tumor [1]. Although they may arise almost anywhere there is fatty tissue in the body, intra-articular examples are extremely rare. Only dozens of cases have been reported so far [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Most cases occur in the knee joint. There are two different benign types of lipoma: The true lipoma and the more common lipoma arborescens [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].Intra-articular true lipoma is defined as a solitary round or ovoid mass of fatty tissue contained in a thin, fibrous capsule and without synovial changes. They typically arise from fat pad area or from the suprapatellar pouch.The clinical findings of intra-articular lipoma depend on the site and size of the mass. Most of the patients may be asymptomatic and some have complaints of dull pain or discomfort due to pressure, joint swelling, motion pain, and limitation of the range of motion [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].Twisting and strangulation of the stalk can cause sudden pain in the knee [2, 3, 4].Lipomas are usually relatively small, which may lead to a locked knee, catching, and the limitation of the range of knee motion like a free body.However, there is a report of huge case exceeding 10 cm (13 cm × 8.5 cm) surprisingly [5].There is also a report that lipoma is located the anterior cruciate ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament and is too small to be diagnosed by MRI. Therefore, there may be potential cases of intra-articular lipoma that is not diagnosed [5, 9, 14].Lipoma arborescens is caused by irritation such as previous trauma, osteoarthritis, and other chronic inflammatory disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, etc.).It is a villous lipomatous proliferation of the synovial membrane [4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12].Hence, true lipoma and lipoma arborescens should be treated as different things.Lipoma arborescens is characterized by a diffuse subsynovial deposit of fat and a villous appearance, associated with joint effusion and synovial cyst, and bone erosion.Above all, joint effusion is typically seen with lipoma arborescens.It is important to consider liposarcoma as well [1, 13].Liposarcoma accounts for about 20% of malignant soft-tissue tumors. Most liposarcoma is asymptomatic and is often 5 cm or larger when noticed. Moreover, it occurs in the deep part, is hard, adheres to surrounding tissues, and has poor mobility.Our patient had no history of preceding trauma or joint disorders.The patient was a middle-aged woman with no symptoms such as pain, joint effusion, and limited range of motion. The tumor is soft and has no adhesion to the surroundings, and is relatively large at 5 cm, but the possibility of malignancy is very low. From these clinical findings, true lipoma is most likely.The laboratory findings are generally unremarkable. Joint fluid typically is negative for crystals, and cultures of the fluid are negative as well [2, 3, 4, 5, 7]. X-rays show no specific findings, only soft-tissue shadows in the region of the suprapatellar pouch and joint space [2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8]. They often show osteoarthritic changes.MRI is an indispensable test for diagnosis of the intra-articular lesions such as synovial lipoma and lipoma arborescens (villous lipomatous proliferation of the synovial membrane). Typically, images of intra-articular synovial lipoma appears the high signal intensity on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. Moreover, low signal intensity is observed in the fat suppression images.Removal of the lesions under arthroscopic guidance or by an open surgical method is curative for intra-articular synovial lipoma [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].On the other hand, thorough arthroscopic synovectomy is essential treatment for lipoma arborescens [11, 12].Arthroscopic removal is clearly less invasive than open arthrotomy. Hence, arthroscopic removal is desirable if possible [2, 3, 4, 5]. If it is too large to be removed under arthroscopy, it must be removed with a short open incision.There have been no recurrence of the lesion following excision in the previous studies so far [3, 5, 14]. Post-operative results are excellent and the patients are painless and living their daily lives.
Conclusion
We have described an intra-articular synovial lipoma in the knee of a middle-aged female. Intra-articular lipomas are very rare. The tumor in this case was relatively large but almost asymptomatic, and the chief complaint was discomfort. At present, the patient is living happy without recurrence after surgery.MRI is essential for the diagnosis of intra-knee lesions. If lipoma is suspected and interferes with life, removal is considered. There have been no reports of recurrence after removal, and good results have been obtained.Declaration of patient consent : The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient’s parents have given their consent for patient images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient’s parents understand that his names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.Conflict of interest:Nil Source of support:None
Authors: Huda S Alsahlawi; Ali Hassan; Sayed Mohamed Hasan; Safa A Alshaikh; Hasan A Al-Aradi Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 2.128