| Literature DB >> 35004319 |
Tian Xue1, Chang Liu1, Jing-Jing Liu1, Yan-Hong Hao1, Yan-Ping Shi1, Xiu-Xiu Zhang1, Yan-Jing Zhang1, Yu-Fang Zhao1, Li-Ping Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastases has a major impact on prognosis and recurrence for patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Thyroid ultrasonography is the preferred inspection to guide the appropriate diagnostic procedure.Entities:
Keywords: cervical lymph node metastasis; contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); conventional ultrasound; nomogram; papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004319 PMCID: PMC8733581 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.794399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Comparison of characteristics of PTCs between lymph node metastasis group and non-metastatic group.
| Features | Metastasis group | Non-metastatic group | Metastasis rate (%) |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n=162 | n=217 | |||||
| Gender | Male | 37 | 32 | 53.6 | 4.080 | 0.043 |
| Female | 125 | 185 | 40.3 | |||
| Age | ≤45 | 105 | 80 | 56.8 | 28.997 | <0.001 |
| >45 | 57 | 137 | 29.4 | |||
| Tumor size | <1 | 59 | 139 | 29.8 | 28.393 | <0.001 |
| ≥1 | 103 | 78 | 56.9 | |||
| Echogenicity | Isoechoic/Hyperechoic | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 1.883 | 0.170 |
| Hypoechoic | 150 | 208 | 41.9 | |||
| Margin | Regular | 21 | 41 | 33.9 | 2.385 | 0.123 |
| Irregular | 141 | 176 | 44.5 | |||
| boundary | Well-defined | 22 | 38 | 36.7 | 1.076 | 0.300 |
| Ill-defined | 140 | 179 | 43.9 | |||
| shape | Taller than wide | 60 | 93 | 39.2 | 1.305 | 0.253 |
| Wider than tall | 102 | 124 | 45.1 | |||
| Microcalcification | Yes | 121 | 124 | 49.4 | 12.497 | <0.001 |
| No | 41 | 93 | 30.6 | |||
| Contact with the adjacent capsule | Yes | 126 | 143 | 46.8 | 6.354 | 0.012 |
| No | 36 | 74 | 32.7 | |||
| Multifocality | Yes | 91 | 94 | 49.2 | 6.134 | 0.013 |
| No | 71 | 123 | 36.6 | |||
Comparison of the extent of tumor-capsule contact between the metastasis group and non-metastatic group.
| Group | Metastasis group | Non-metastatic group | Metastasis (%) |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n=162 | n=217 | |||||
| The extent of tumor-capsule contact | None | 36 | 74 | 32.7% | -4.578 | <0.001 |
| <25% | 41 | 76 | 35.0% | |||
| 25%-50% | 41 | 49 | 45.6% | |||
| >50% | 44 | 18 | 77.0% | |||
Figure 1A 39-year-old woman with PTC. (A) Preoperative ultrasound images showing that the size of the tumor was approximately 3.85*3.27*2.01 cm in the right lobe, and the boundary was ill-defined, with microcalcifications. (B) Transverse sonogram showing that the contact range with the capsule was approximately >50%. (C) CEUS showing heterogeneous hyperenhancement in the nodule with interrupted thyroid capsule integrity (no enhancement area). (D) Lymph nodes were metastatic in levels III-IV of the right neck with the normal structures disappearing. (E) Surgical pathology confirming PTC (HE, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification, ×40). (F) Surgical pathology confirming cervical lymph node metastasis from PTC (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification, ×40).
Figure 2A 36-year-old woman with PTC. (A) Preoperative ultrasound images showing that the size of the tumor was approximately 1.81*1.30*1.09 cm in the left lobe, and microcalcification was detected. (B) Transverse sonogram showing that the contact range with the capsule was >50%. (C) CEUS showing hyperenhancement of the whole nodule. (D) Confirmation by surgical pathology as CLNM in ipsilateral level VI (HE, original magnification, ×100).
CEUS features of PTCs in lymph node metastatic group and non-metastatic group.
| Characteristics | Metastatic group | Non-metastatic group | Metastasis (%) | χ2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n=162 | n=217 | |||||
| Enhancement | hypo | 109 | 159 | 40.7 | 8.632 | 0.013 |
| iso | 32 | 48 | 40.0 | |||
| hyper | 21 | 10 | 67.7 | |||
| Integrity of the capsule | continuous | 95 | 171 | 35.7 | 18.015 | <0.001 |
| Interrupt | 67 | 46 | 59.3 | |||
CEUS enhancement extent of PTCS in lymph node metastasis group and non-metastatic group.
| Enhancement | Metastasis group | Non-metastatic group |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n=162 | n=217 | |||
| Hyper | 21 | 10 | 8.286 | 0.004 |
| Hypo | 109 | 159 | ||
| Iso | 32 | 48 | 0.012 | 0.914 |
| Hypo | 109 | 159 | ||
| Hyper | 21 | 10 | 6.892 | 0.009 |
| Iso | 32 | 48 |
Figure 4A 42-year-old woman with PTC. (A) Preoperative ultrasound images showing that the size of the tumor was approximately 1.00*0.77*1.03 cm in the right lobe with hypoechogenicity, an irregular margin, a poorly defined boundary and a taller-than-wide shape. (B) Transverse sonogram showing that the contact range with the capsule was approximately 25%-50%. (C) CEUS showing heterogeneous hypoenhancement in the nodule. (D) Metastatic lymph node showing that the normal structure disappeared, and microcalcification was detected inside. (E) Surgical specimen confirming PTC (HE, original magnification, ×100). (F) Surgical specimen confirming cervical lymph node metastasis from PTC (HE, original magnification, ×100).
Logistic regression analysis of cervical lymph node metastasis in PTC.
| Variable |
|
| Wald |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
| Age | 1.347 | 0.241 | 31.272 | <0.001 | 3.846 | 2.399 | 6.117 |
| Tumor size | 0.926 | 0.280 | 10.978 | 0.001 | 2.526 | 1.460 | 4.369 |
| The contact range of the adjacent capsule >50% | 1.106 | 0.422 | 6.876 | 0.009 | 3.023 | 1.322 | 6.911 |
| Multifocality | 0.863 | 0.241 | 12.826 | <0.001 | 2.370 | 1.478 | 3.800 |
| Constant | -2.133 | 0.320 | 44.500 | <0.001 | 0.118 | ||
β is the regression coefficient; S.E is the standard error; Wald is the chi-square value; OR is the odds ratio.
Figure 5(A) Nomogram for predicting CLNM in PTC patients based on four risk factors. (B) The ROC curve and AUC of the nomogram; ROC, receiver operating characteristics. (C) Calibration plots of nomogram for predicting CLNM (internal validation set).
Regional status of cervical lymph node metastasis in 162 cases of PTC.
| Lymph node metastatic level |
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | VI | |||
| + | 3 | 25 | 57 | 56 | 25 | 133 | 302.366 | <0.001 |
| – | 159 | 137 | 105 | 106 | 137 | 29 | ||
| metastasis rate | 1.9%a | 15.4%b | 35.2%c | 34.6%c | 15.4%b | 82.1%d | ||
For superscript a, b, c and d with the same letters, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (P > 0.05), but there was statistically significant difference between groups with different letters (P < 0.05).