| Literature DB >> 35004267 |
Yu Jiang1,2,3, Yue Wan1,3, Jing Li4, Yueshui Zhao1,2,3, Yongshun Ma1,2,3, Jing Yu1,2,3, Donghong Yuan1,2,3, Shixin Xiang1,2,3, Fukuan Du1,2,3, Xu Wu1,2,3, Mingxing Li1,2,3, Yu Chen1,2,3, Zhangang Xiao1,2,3, Qinglian Wen3, Wei Hu5, Jing Shen1,2,3.
Abstract
Gut microbiota is a complex aggregation of microbial organisms, which offers diverse protective benefits to the host. Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota is frequently associated with many diseases. Vitamin D3 (VD), which was originally associated with bone health, also possesses antimicrobial activities and can act through antimicrobial peptide. Cathelicidin is a type of antimicrobial peptide in host to maintain the balance of gut microbiome. Our current study sought to evaluate the protective effect of VD and cathelicidin in mice intestines by administration of VD or mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis. We herein provided a comprehensive profile of the impact of VD and mCRAMP on gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing, followed by bioinformatics and statistical analysis. Our results revealed an increased richness of bacterial community in mice intestines due to VD administration. Moreover, we showed a beneficial effect of VD and mCRAMP by enhancing the colonization of bacterial taxa that are associated with protective effects to the host but repressing the propagation of bacterial taxa that are associated with harmful effects to the host. Various metabolic pathways related to amino acid and lipid metabolism were affected in this process. We further established a bacterial panel as a reliable biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of remodeling the mice gut microbiota by VD and mCRAMP administration. The uncovered effects will deepen the comprehension about the antibacterial mechanisms of VD and mCRAMP and provide new insights for therapeutic implication of them.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; L. lactis; gut microbiota; mCRAMP; vitamin D3
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004267 PMCID: PMC8732771 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.700038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Experimental design for mice model. Mice in group A, B, C, and D were orally given PBS (100 μl), VD (25 μg/kg), L. lactis (1010 cfu/mouse), or mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis (1010 cfu/mouse), respectively, every day from day 1 to day 10. Stool samples were collected on day 11 morning for further analysis.
Figure 2Diversity estimate calculations of bacterial OTUs between control, VD, and mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis–treated mice. (A) Rarefaction curve was generated to determine the sequencing depth per sample. (B, C) The Chao1 and Shannon indexes of control, VD, and mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis–treated mice were calculated to estimate bacterial richness and diversity. Horizontal lines represent mean value. ** p < 0.01. p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance using a Welch’s t-test. (D) Principal component analysis (PCoA) were used to evaluate the bacterial community difference in each group by Bray-Curtis. PERMANOVA (Adonis) analyses were performed to evaluate the overall differences on OTU level between groups. The box plot showed the difference of microbial community on the first principal coordinate (PC1), and the statistical differences were determined with Mann-Whitney test (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). (E) Heatmap using the Bray-Curtis distances was analyzed to assess sample distances at genus level based on the OTU results. (F) Distance boxplot with ANOSIM analysis indicated a significant difference overall the groups of samples (p < 0.05). (B, C) Were generated using an online tool ImageGP (http://www.ehbio.com/ImageGP/index.php/Home/Index/index.html), and (E) was performed by R software using vegan package. ns, not significant.
Figure 3Relative abundance of different bacteria in control, VD, and mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis–treated mice. Bacteria taxonomic profiling at the phylum (A) and genus (B) levels of gut microbiota from control, VD, and mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis–treated mice were presented. (C–E) Bar graphs show the relative abundance of bacteria in control, VD, and mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis–treated mice. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 4LEfSe analysis of gut microbiota taxa in control, VD, and mCRAMP-encoding L. lactis–treated mice. (A, C) LEfSe cladograms were built to show the differently abundant bacteria in each group. Red nodes represent the bacterial biomarkers with highest abundance in PBS (A) or N0I (C) groups, while blue nodes indicate the predominant bacterial biomarkers in VD (A) or N4I (C) groups. “p” referred to phylum, “c” referred to class, “o” referred to order, “f” referred to family, “g” referred to genus. (B, D) Bar plots show linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores, which are interpreted as the degree of consistent difference in relative abundance of fecal bacterial communities across each group. Red bars represent the bacterial biomarkers with highest abundance in PBS (B) or N0I (D) groups, while blue bars indicate the predominant bacterial biomarkers in VD (B) or N4I (D) groups. LDA score greater than 2 was considered a difference in bacterial abundance among each group. The LEfSe analysis was analyzed by LEfSe software (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/root?tool_id=lefse_upload).
Figure 5The area under curves of potential bacterial biomarkers in discriminating mCRAMP-treated mice from control subjects. (A–C) ROC curves of three selected bacterial marker candidates, including Staphylococcus (A), Lactobacillus (B), and unclassified_o_Lacobacillales (C), were calculated to determine the efficacy of reshaped gut microbiota composition in mCRAMP-treated mice. AUC values close to 1 indicate that a high true positive rate was achieved with low false positive rate (ideal performance), while AUC values close to 0.5 indicate random performance.
Figure 6Differentially enriched functions of gut microbiota among control, VD, and mCRAMP-treated mice by PICRUSt analysis. The functions were predicated by KEGG (A, B) and COG (C) database in control, VD, and mCRAMP-treated mice. (A) Heatmap showing the top 20 pathways of the abundance, which was colored by logarithmic value, and the significant difference between the groups (VD vs PBS, N0I vs PBS, N4I vs N0I) were marked. (B) Pathways with over 0.1% changes compared to control group were shown. (C) The significantly different COG functions. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001 indicates statistical significance using Welch’s t-test and adjusted false discovery rate. The heatmap was analyzed using PICRUSt package by R software, and (B, C) were generated by Graphpad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc, LaJolla, CA, USA).