| Literature DB >> 35004255 |
Jinghan Shi1, Fei Li2, Fujun Yang3, Zhengwei Dong4, Yan Jiang3, Dania Nachira5, Justyna Chalubinska-Fendler6, Terence T Sio7, Yo Kawaguchi8, Hiromitsu Takizawa9, Xiao Song3, Yang Hu10, Liang Duan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is a clinical manifestation associated with a poor prognosis, and diagnosing it preoperatively is highly imperative for successful sublobar resection of these peripheral tumors. We evaluated the roles of computed tomography (CT) features and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for improving VPI detection in patients with clinical T1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: Lung adenocarcinoma; circulating tumor cell (CTC); computed tomography (CT); thoracic surgery; visceral pleural invasion (VPI)
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004255 PMCID: PMC8674597 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res ISSN: 2218-6751
Figure 1CT images depicting pleural contact with ISP in lung window settings (window width, 1,500 HU; window level, −600 HU; black arrow, length of the solid portion between tumor and pleura) (A), and pleural tag, represented by linear pleural tag with soft tissue component in lung window settings (B). CT, computed tomography; ISP, interface solid portion.
Figure 2Flowchart of the study population. CT, computed tomography; CTC, circulating tumor cell; EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound; PET, positron emission tomography.
Characteristics of patients with ≤30 mm peripheral lung adenocarcinoma (n=391)
| Characteristics | N | Radiographic pleural involvement, n (%) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent (n=157) | Present (n=234) | |||
| Gender | 0.724 | |||
| Female | 201 | 79 (50.3) | 122 (52.1) | |
| Male | 190 | 78 (49.7) | 112 (47.9) | |
| Age, years | 0.291 | |||
| <60 | 189 | 81 (51.6) | 108 (46.2) | |
| ≥60 | 202 | 76 (48.4) | 126 (53.8) | |
| Smoking status | 0.338 | |||
| Never | 299 | 124 (79.0) | 175 (74.8) | |
| Ever | 92 | 33 (21.0) | 59 (25.2) | |
| Preoperative CEA, ng/mLa | 0.270 | |||
| <5 | 355 | 144 (95.4) | 211 (92.5) | |
| ≥5 | 24 | 7 (4.6) | 17 (7.5) | |
| CTC level, FU/3 mL of blood | 0.701 | |||
| <8.7 | 103 | 43 (27.4) | 60 (25.6) | |
| ≥8.7 | 288 | 114 (72.6) | 174 (74.4) | |
| Tumor size, mm | 0.010 | |||
| 0–10 | 24 | 13 (8.3) | 11 (4.7) | |
| 10–20 | 208 | 94 (59.9) | 114 (48.7) | |
| 20–30 | 159 | 50 (31.8) | 109 (46.6) | |
| Nodule type | <0.001 | |||
| Nonsolid | 53 | 42 (26.8) | 11 (4.7) | |
| Part-solid | 200 | 79 (50.3) | 121 (51.7) | |
| Pure-solid | 138 | 36 (22.9) | 102 (43.6) | |
| Tumor location | 0.011 | |||
| Upper lobe | 210 | 85 (54.1) | 125 (53.4) | |
| Middle lobe | 28 | 4 (2.5) | 24 (10.3) | |
| Lower lobe | 153 | 68 (43.3) | 85 (36.3) | |
| Type of resection | 0.01 | |||
| Wedge resection | 8 | 3 (1.9) | 5 (2.1) | |
| Segmentectomy | 74 | 41 (26.1) | 33 (14.1) | |
| Lobectomy | 309 | 113 (72.0) | 196 (83.8) | |
| VPI | <0.001 | |||
| PL0 | 342 | 157 (100.0) | 185 (79.1) | |
| PL1 | 34 | 0 (0.0) | 34 (14.5) | |
| PL2 | 15 | 0 (0.0) | 15 (6.4) | |
| pTNM stage | 0.142 | |||
| I | 362 | 149 (94.9) | 213 (91.1) | |
| II | 14 | 2 (1.3) | 12 (5.1) | |
| III | 15 | 6 (3.8) | 9 (3.8) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.312 | |||
| Negative | 365 | 149 (94.9) | 216 (92.3) | |
| Positive | 26 | 8 (5.1) | 18 (7.7) | |
| Predominant pattern | 0.040 | |||
| Lepidic | 75 | 35 (22.3) | 40 (17.1) | |
| Acinar | 244 | 92 (58.6) | 152 (65.0) | |
| Papillary | 32 | 15 (9.6) | 17 (7.3) | |
| Micropapillary | 7 | 0 (0.0) | 7 (3.0) | |
| Solid | 17 | 5 (3.2) | 12 (5.1) | |
| Mucinous | 16 | 10 (6.4) | 6 (2.6) | |
a, preoperative serum CEA values were available for 379 patients in our hospital. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CTC, circulating tumor cells; FU, functional unit; VPI, visceral pleural invasion.
Analysis of the association between clinicopathological characteristics and visceral pleural invasion in patients with radiographic pleural involvement (n=234)
| Characteristics | N | VPI, n (%) | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (n=185) | Positive (n=49) | P value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P value | ||||
| Preoperative CEA, ng/mLa | 0.042 | |||||||||
| <5 | 211 | 170 (94.4) | 41 (85.4) | Ref. | – | Ref. | – | |||
| ≥5 | 17 | 10 (5.6) | 7 (14.6) | 2.90 (1.04–8.08) | 0.041 | 1.13 (0.33–3.92) | 0.845 | |||
| CTC level, FU/3 mL blood | <0.001 | |||||||||
| <10.42 | 117 | 106 (57.3) | 11 (22.4) | Ref. | – | Ref. | – | |||
| ≥10.42 | 117 | 79 (42.7) | 38 (77.6) | 4.64 (2.23–9.63) | <0.001 | 4.62 (2.05–10.44) | <0.001 | |||
| Tumor size, mm | 0.039 | 1.84 (1.03–3.28) | 0.040b | 1.96 (1.02–3.76) | 0.044b | |||||
| 0–10 | 11 | 10 (5.4) | 1 (2.0) | |||||||
| 10–20 | 114 | 95 (51.4) | 19 (38.8) | |||||||
| 20–30 | 109 | 80 (43.2) | 29 (59.2) | |||||||
| Nodule type | <0.001 | 9.73 (4.34–21.81) | <0.001b | 9.62 (3.98–23.26) | <0.001b | |||||
| Nonsolid | 11 | 11 (5.9) | 0 (0.0) | |||||||
| Part-solid | 121 | 113 (61.1) | 8 (16.3) | |||||||
| Pure-solid | 102 | 61 (33.0) | 41 (83.7) | |||||||
| Tumor location | 0.433 | 0.82 (0.58–1.16) | 0.255b | – | – | |||||
| Upper lobe | 125 | 96 (51.9) | 29 (59.2) | |||||||
| Middle lobe | 24 | 18 (9.7) | 6 (12.2) | |||||||
| Lower lobe | 85 | 71 (38.4) | 14 (28.6) | |||||||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.224 | |||||||||
| Negative | 216 | 173 (93.5) | 43 (87.8) | Ref. | – | – | – | |||
| Positive | 18 | 12 (6.5) | 6 (12.2) | 2.01 (0.71–5.67) | 0.186 | – | – | |||
| Predominant pattern | 0.001 | 1.51 (1.17–1.96) | 0.002b | 1.12 (0.80–1.57) | 0.506b | |||||
| Lepidic | 40 | 40 (21.6) | 0 (0.0) | |||||||
| Acinar | 152 | 118 (63.8) | 34 (69.4) | |||||||
| Papillary | 17 | 12 (6.5) | 5 (10.2) | |||||||
| Micropapillary | 7 | 5 (2.7) | 2 (4.1) | |||||||
| Solid | 12 | 4 (2.2) | 8 (16.3) | |||||||
| Mucinous | 6 | 6 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | |||||||
a, preoperative serum CEA values were available for 228 patients in our hospital; b, P for trend. CI, confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; Ref., reference; CTC, circulating tumor cells; FU, functional unit; VPI, visceral pleural invasion.
Analysis of the association between radiographic features, CTC levels, and the presence of visceral pleural invasion in tumors with pleural contact or pleural tag (n=234)
| Characteristics | N | VPI | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | P value | Odds ratio | P value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P value | ||||
| Pleural contact | 93 | |||||||||
| Tumor size (mm), median (IQR) | 17.1 (13.5–22.2) | 21.4 (18.4–28.8) | 0.001 | 1.16 (1.06–1.28) | 0.002 | 1.02 (0.86–1.18) | 0.151 | |||
| Solid portion size (mm), median (IQR) | 11.1 (8.2–16.1) | 21.4 (18–28.6) | <0.001 | 1.24 (1.13–1.36) | <0.001 | 1.02 (0.86–1.21) | 0.862 | |||
| ISP length (mm), median (IQR) | 7.7 (3.8–12.2) | 15.1 (10.6–17.3) | <0.001 | 1.23 (1.11–1.36) | <0.001 | 1.48 (1.08–2.02) | 0.014 | |||
| Interface length proportion (%), median (IQR) | 64.8 (50.1–83.8) | 71.2 (62.1–83.3) | 0.137 | 5.74 (0.48–69.44) | 0.169 | – | – | |||
| Pleural retraction, n (%) | 0.146 | |||||||||
| Absent | 37 | 31 (44.3) | 6 (26.1) | Ref. | – | – | – | |||
| Present | 56 | 39 (55.7) | 17 (73.9) | 2.25 (0.79–6.39) | 0.127 | – | – | |||
| CTC level (FU/3 mL blood), n (%) | 0.015 | |||||||||
| <10.42 | 42 | 37 (52.9) | 5 (21.7) | Ref. | – | Ref. | – | |||
| ≥10.42 | 51 | 33 (47.1) | 18 (78.3) | 4.04 (1.35–12.08) | 0.013 | 4.12 (1.09–15.66) | 0.038 | |||
| Pleural tag | 141 | |||||||||
| Tumor size (mm), median (IQR) | 19.9 (16.1–23.7) | 23.5 (17.6–29.2) | 0.071 | 1.08 (0.99–1.16) | 0.065 | – | – | |||
| Solid portion size (mm), median (IQR) | 12.4 (8.3–19.1) | 19.5 (16.5–28.7) | <0.001 | 1.17 (1.08–1.26) | <0.001 | 1.14 (1.06–1.23) | <0.001 | |||
| Distance between nodule and pleura (mm), median (IQR) | 5.4 (3.1–7.6) | 5.8 (3.7–9.7) | 0.395 | 1.03 (0.94–1.13) | 0.516 | – | – | |||
| CTC level (FU/3 mL blood), n (%) | 0.001 | |||||||||
| <10.42 | 75 | 69 (60.0) | 6 (23.1) | Ref. | – | Ref. | – | |||
| ≥10.42 | 66 | 46 (40.0) | 20 (76.9) | 5.00 (1.87–13.40) | 0.001 | 5.34 (1.88–15.17) | 0.002 | |||
VPI, visceral pleural invasion; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; ISP, interface solid portion; Ref., reference; CTC, circulating tumor cells; FU, functional unit.
Figure 3ROC curve analysis of CTCs combined with CT imaging features associated with VPI for all patients (A), patients with pleural contact (B), and patients with pleural tag (C). ROC, receiver operating characteristic; CTC, circulating tumor cells; CT, computed tomography; VPI, visceral pleural invasion; ISP, interface solid portion.
Diagnostic efficacy of CTC levels and imaging features for predicting patients with visceral pleural invasion (n=234)
| Group | AUC | 95% CI | P value | Youden Index | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients, n=234 (VPI-positive | ||||||
| CTC counts | 0.717 | 0.655–0.774 | – | 0.3983 | 75.51 | 64.32 |
| Pleural contact, n=93 (VPI-positive | ||||||
| CTC counts | 0.702 | 0.599–0.793 | 0.0003 | 0.3553 | 86.96 | 48.57 |
| ISP length | 0.802 | 0.707–0.878 | 0.0005 | 0.5267 | 86.96 | 65.71 |
| CTC counts + ISP length | 0.921 | 0.846–0.967 | – | 0.7124 | 86.96 | 84.29 |
| Pleural tag, n=141 (VPI-positive | ||||||
| CTC counts | 0.723 | 0.642–0.795 | 0.0067 | 0.4314 | 69.23 | 73.91 |
| Solid portion size | 0.730 | 0.648–0.801 | 0.0051 | 0.4214 | 76.92 | 65.22 |
| CTC counts + solid portion size | 0.862 | 0.794–0.914 | – | 0.6823 | 76.92 | 91.30 |
AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; VPI, visceral pleural invasion; CTC, circulating tumor cell; ISP, interface solid portion.