| Literature DB >> 35004228 |
Hamideh Ebrahimi Aval1,2, Masoumeh Hashemian1, Mohammad Miri3.
Abstract
Evidence on a comprehensive greenspace exposure assessment on primary school children is scarce yet. Therefore, we aimed to assess a comprehensive greenspace exposure on primary school children and their behavioral function. We assessed different aspects of exposure to greenspace as well as behavioral function in 704 primary school children in Sabzevar, Iran, during the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., 22 September 2020 to 10 March 2021). The greenspace indicators were including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in 100, 300 and 500m buffers around children's homes based on Landsat 8 images with 30 × 30 m resolution, residential proximity to green space based on the Euclidean distance of the geocoded residential address to (i) the nearest green space of any area and (ii) the nearest green space with an area of at least 5000m2 (i.e., major green space) based on land use map of the study area, time spent in public and private green spaces, number of plant pots at home and visual access to greenspace based on a prepared questionnaire. The behavioral development of primary school children was assessed using a Persian online validated version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) filled by parents.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Difficulties; Kids; NDVI; Park; School; Strengths; Tree
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004228 PMCID: PMC8720888 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1Location of the study area, streets, NDVI and 1 km grids.
Fig. 2Flow diagram of the study protocol.
The interpreting SDQ scores [13].
| The SDQ filled by parents | This score is close to average - clinically significant problems in this area are unlikely' | 'This score is slightly raised, which may reflect clinically significant problems' | 'This score is high - there is a substantial risk of clinically significant problems in this area' |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Difficulties Score | 0–13 | 14–16 | 17–40 |
| Emotional Symptoms Score | 0–3 | 4 | 5–10 |
| Conduct Problem Score | 0–2 | 3 | 4–10 |
| Hyperactivity Score | 0–5 | 6 | 7–10 |
| Peer Problem Score | 0–2 | 3 | 4–10 |
| Prosocial Behavior Score | 6–10 | 5 | 0–4 |
descriptive statistic of greenspace indicators and SDQ (continuous variables)
| Variable | Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDVI in 100 buffer | 0.070 | 0.016 | 0.03 | 0.195 |
| NDVI in 300 buffer | 0.074 | 0.013 | 0.042 | 0.157 |
| NDVI in 500 buffer | 0.077 | 0.012 | 0.049 | 0.146 |
| Residential proximity to any greenspace (m) | 230 | 154 | 0 | 824 |
| Residential proximity to greenspace > 5000 m2 (m) | 365 | 221 | 0 | 1062 |
| Time spent in public green spaces (h/week) | 2 | 3 | 0 | 24 |
| Time spent in private green spaces (min /day) | 22 | 54 | 0 | 420 |
| Number of plant pots at home (n) | 8 | 9 | 0 | 60 |
| Total score of SDQ | 11 | 6 | 0 | 31 |
frequency (percent) of categorical indicators of greenspace exposure.
| Variable | N | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Having a window with greenspace view (Yes) | 386 | 54.8 |
| Frequently looking at greenspace (Sometimes/always) | 101 | 14.4 |
| 50% or more of window covered by greenspace (Yes) | 158 | 22.44 |
| Subject area: | Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine |
| More specific subject area: | |
| Protocol name: | |
| Reagents/tools: | |
| Experimental design: | |
| Trial registration: | |
| Ethics: | |
| Value of the Protocol: |