| Literature DB >> 35003915 |
Xingzhou Qu1, Zhaoqi Sun1, Yang Wang1, Hui Shan Ong1.
Abstract
Bisphosphonates (BPs)-related osteonecrosis of jaw (BRONJ) is a severe complication of the long-term administration of BPs. The development of BRONJ is associated with the cell death of osteoclasts, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In the current study, the role of Zoledronic acid (ZA), a kind of bisphosphonates, in suppressing the growth of osteoclasts was investigated and its underlying mechanism was explored. The role of ZA in regulating osteoclasts function was evaluated in the RANKL-induced cell model. Cell viability was assessed by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and fluorescein diacetate (FDA)-staining. We confirmed that ZA treatment suppressed cell viability of osteoclasts. Furthermore, ZA treatment led to osteoclasts death by facilitating osteoclasts ferroptosis, as evidenced by increased Fe2+, ROS, and malonyldialdehyde (MDA) level, and decreased glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and glutathione (GSH) level. Next, the gene expression profiles of alendronate- and risedronate-treated osteoclasts were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset, and 18 differentially expressed genes were identified using venn diagram analysis. Among these 18 genes, the expression of F-box protein 9 (FBXO9) was inhibited by ZA treatment. Knockdown of FBXO9 resulted in osteoclasts ferroptosis. More important, FBXO9 overexpression repressed the effect of ZA on regulating osteoclasts ferroptosis. Mechanistically, FBXO9 interacted with p53 and decreased the protein stability of p53. Collectively, our study showed that ZA induced osteoclast cells ferroptosis by triggering FBXO9-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation.Entities:
Keywords: Bisphosphonates related osteonecrosis of jaw; FBXO9; Ferroptosis; Zoledronic acid; p53
Year: 2021 PMID: 35003915 PMCID: PMC8684721 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Sequence.
| CFAP53: |
| forward primer:5′-GACAAAATGAGAGAGAGAACCAAGT-3′ |
| reverse primer: 5′-TCCCTGAACTGCTGGTCTAAC-3′ |
| COL14A1 |
| forward primer:5′-ACTGGTTTTCACGGGTGTTC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TAAGTCGAGGAGAGGCAAGC-3′ |
| ARSJ |
| forward primer:5′-CTGAGATAAAGACGCCCACC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-ATAGAATGCTGAAGTCCCGTG-3′ |
| ABCA9 |
| forward primer:5′-CAGAGGGAGTGAAGAGAAAGC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-GCTCTGTGTTTGTGAAAGTGG-3′ |
| CXorf57: |
| forward primer:5′-GCAGTATAGGGAACAAAAGCG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TGCTTGAGATGTTGAGGGAC-3′ |
| GPR22: |
| forward primer:5′-CCACTGTCATACCCACTAAGC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-ATGCAGTAAAGTACCAGGACG-3′ |
| STXBP5L: |
| forward primer:5′-GATCAAGTGACCTGTACCAGC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-ATTTACATGGTCTGAGGTGGG-3′ |
| MSANTD4 |
| forward primer:5′-CAGAGGTCAAAGTGGAAGAGG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-ATCAATGTGAGGGAAGTCAGG-3′ |
| RRP15 |
| forward primer:5′-GAAATGCTGTGCAGAGTGAAG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TCCTGCTTCCTTAACCTTTTCG-3′ |
| UGT1A2 |
| forward primer:5′-TCTGCGTTCTCTTTCCTGTG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-AGCATGTTCTGGACCCTTTG-3′ |
| IRF4 |
| forward primer:5′-AACAAGCTAGAAAGAGACCAGAC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TCACCAAAGCACAGAGTCAC-3′ |
| TFAP2D |
| forward primer:5′- AAAGATGATCCTAGCCACCAAG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TGTGTTAAGTGCCTCTGGATG-3′ |
| TRHDE |
| forward primer:5′-AGGAAGGCTTTGCTCACTAC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-CTGTGATACTGGATGGGAACTG-3′ |
| ASMT |
| forward primer:5′-GAAGTGGGACAGGAAGTGAG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-CGGGAACAGGAAGTGGC-3′ |
| CAPS |
| forward primer:5′-AGCTCGAAGACACAATCCG-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TCCATGTCCACTGCAAAGAG-3′ |
| COMMD10 |
| forward primer:5′-AGTGGGATGGCAGCTTAAC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-TCGAACAGCTCCTTGTGATTG-3′ |
| VSTM4 |
| forward primer:5′-CCTGGCAGTCTGTGTTTCA-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-CTCTTACCCTTCTGTGGCTG-3′ |
| FBXO9 |
| forward primer:5′-ATGAGAGTCCGGCTGAGAGA-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-AGAGCTTCTTCCTGCTCTGC-3′ |
| 18s |
| forward primer:5′-CTCAACACGGGAAACCTCAC-3′, |
| reverse primer: 5′-CGCTCCACCAACTAAGAACG-3′ |
Figure 1ZA treatment facilitated the ferroptosis of osteoclasts.
The osteoclasts cell model induced by RANKL (50 ng/ml) treatment. (A and B) Multinucleated cells were visualized by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. (C and D) Cell viability of Raw264.7 and BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using CCK8 assay after treatment with different concentrations of ZA (5, 10, and 50 μM) (n = 3). (E and F) Cell viability of Raw264.7 and BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using FDA staining after treatment with different concentrations of ZA (5, 10, and 50 μM) (n = 3). (G and H) Cell viability of Raw264.7 and BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using CCK8 assay after treatment with ZA for 48 h (50 μM) in the presence or absence of 10 μM of ZVAD-FMK, 2 μM of Fer-1, or 10 μM of necrostatin-1 (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 2ZA treatment facilitated the ferroptosis of osteoclasts.
(A–E) The level of Fe2+, MDA content, ROS level, the level of Gpx4, and GSH content in Raw264.7 derived osteoclasts was assessed by Elisa assay after treatment with different concentrations of ZA (5, 10, and 50 μM) (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (F–J) The level of Fe2+, MDA content, ROS level, the level of Gpx4, and GSH content in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed by Elisa assay after treatment with different concentrations of ZA (5, 10, and 50 μM) (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3FBXO9 was downregulated in osteoclasts after ZA treatment.
(A) Venn analysis of DEGs of alendronate and risedronate-treated osteoclast. (B and C) The mRNA level of 18 genes in Raw264.7 and BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using qPCR after treatment with ZA (50 μM) (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (D) The protein level of FBXO9 in Raw264.7 and BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using western blot after treatment with ZA (50 μM).
Figure 4FBXO9 inhibition facilitated the ferroptosis of osteoclasts.
(A) The mRNA level of FBXO9 in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using qPCR after treatment with or without si-FBXO9 (n = 3). ***p < 0.001. (B) The protein level of FBXO9 in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using western blot after treatment with or with out si-FBXO9 (n = 3). **p < 0.01. (C) Cell viability of BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using CCK8 assay after treatment with or without si-FBXO9 (n = 3). **p < 0.01. (D and E) Cell viability of BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using FDA staining after treatment with or without si-FBXO9 (n = 3). *p < 0.05. (F–J) The level of Fe2+, MDA content, ROS level, the level of Gpx4, and GSH content in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed by Elisa assay after treatment with or without si-FBXO9 (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5ZA treatment facilitated the ferroptosis of osteoclasts by suppressing FBXO9.
(A) The mRNA level of FBXO9 in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using qPCR after treatment with ZA (50 μM) in the presence or absence of FBXO9 (n = 3). **p < 0.01. (B) The protein level of FBXO9 in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using western blot after treatment with ZA (50 μM) in the presence or absence of FBXO9 (n = 3). *p < 0.05. (C) Cell viability of BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using CCK8 assay after treatment with ZA (50 μM) in the presence or absence of FBXO9 (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (D and E) Cell viability of BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed using FDA staining after treatment with ZA (50 μM) in the presence or absence of FBXO9 (n = 3). *p < 0.05. (F–J) The level of Fe2+, MDA content, ROS level, the level of Gpx4, and GSH content in BMDM derived osteoclasts was assessed by Elisa assay after treatment with ZA (50 μM) in the presence or absence of FBXO9 (n = 3) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6FBXO9 inhibition facilitated the ferroptosis of osteoclasts by blocking the ubiquitin mediated-proteasome degradation of p53.
(A) The target of FBXO9 was predicted by ubibrowser. (B) The p53 mRNA expression in the FBXO9 knockdown and control cell was assessed by qPCR (n = 3). (C) The protein level of p53 in the FBXO9 knockdown and control cell was assessed by western blot (n = 3). (D) FBXO9 directly interacts with p53. The proteins from BMDM derived osteoclasts were IP with IgG or antibodies against FBXO9 and p53, following by western blot analysis (n = 3). (E) The stability of p53 protein was regulated by FBXO9. BMDM derived osteoclasts treated with or without si-FBXO9 in the presence of cycloheximide (CHX, 25 ug/ml) for various times as indicated and cell lysates were then assessed by western blot (n = 3). **p < 0.01. (F) The cell lysates isolated from scramble and si-FBXO9 infected BMDM derived osteoclasts were immunoprecipitated with anti-p53 antibody, then analyzed by western blot using ubiquitin antibody (n = 3).