| Literature DB >> 35003681 |
Joshua G Lynton-Jenkins1, Andrew F Russell1, Jaime Chaves2,3, Camille Bonneaud1.
Abstract
Endemic island species face unprecedented threats, with many populations in decline or at risk of extinction. One important threat is the introduction of novel and potentially devastating diseases, made more pressing due to accelerating global connectivity, urban development, and climatic changes. In the Galápagos archipelago two important wildlife diseases: avian pox (Avipoxvirus spp.) and avian malaria (Plasmodium spp. and related Haemosporidia) challenge endemic species. San Cristóbal island has seen a paucity of disease surveillance in avian populations, despite the island's connectedness to the continent and the wider archipelago. To survey prevalence and better understand the dynamics of these two diseases on San Cristóbal, we captured 1205 birds of 11 species on the island between 2016 and 2020. Study sites included urban and rural lowland localities as well as rural highland sites in 2019. Of 995 blood samples screened for avian haemosporidia, none tested positive for infection. In contrast, evidence of past and active pox infection was observed in 97 birds and identified as strains Gal1 and Gal2. Active pox prevalence differed significantly with contemporary climatic conditions, being highest during El Niño events (~11% in 2016 and in 2019 versus <1% in the La Niña year of 2018). Pox prevalence was also higher at urban sites than rural (11% to 4%, in 2019) and prevalence varied between host species, ranging from 12% in medium ground finches (Geospiza fortis) to 4% in Yellow Warblers (Setophaga petechial aureola). In the most common infected species (Small Ground Finch: Geospiza fuliginosa), birds recovered from pox had significantly longer wings, which may suggest a selective cost to infection. These results illustrate the threat future climate changes and urbanization may present in influencing disease dynamics in the Galápagos, while also highlighting unknowns regarding species-specific susceptibilities to avian pox and the transmission dynamics facilitating outbreaks within these iconic species.Entities:
Keywords: Avipoxvirus; El Nino; avian pox; haemosporidia; small ground finch
Year: 2021 PMID: 35003681 PMCID: PMC8717262 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1The small ground finch (Geospiza fuliginosa) – an iconic endemic Galápagoan bird species and the most numerous of the eleven species encountered in this study
Capture numbers per species and capture sites (locations shown in Figure 2) from the island of San Cristobal for 2016, 2018, 2019, and 2020 with numbers in parentheses indicating the subset of birds which presented evidence of pox (active pox lesions, past pox scarring)
| Rural lowlands | Urban lowlands | Highlands | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobería | Tijeretas | Opuntias | Playa Mann | Baquerizo | Otoy | H.T. | ||||||||||
| 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2019 | 2019 | |
| Small ground finch | 13 (2,0) | 192 (1,4) | 114 (7,6) | 42 (2,10) | 10 | 27 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 42 (4,0) | 56 | 54 (5,6) | 2 | 12 (1,1) | 140 (3,6) | 82 (2,11) |
| Medium ground finch | 3 (1,0) | 13 | 55 (1,4) | 4 | 3 (1,0) | 9 | 2 | – | 1 | 2 | 24 | 21 (4,1) | – | 9 (2,1) | 3 | 7 (1,2) |
| Yellow warbler | – | 19 | 26 | 1 | – | 2 | 4 | – | 3 (0,1) | – | – | 13 | – | 8 (1,0) | 17 (1,0) | 15 (1,0) |
| Small tree finch | 8 (1,0) | 12 | 7 (1,0) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Galápagos flycatcher | – | 2 | 13 (1,0) | – | – | 2 | 1 | – | 9 | – | 1 (1,0) | 1 | – | – | 4 | 7 (0,1) |
| Other species | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 9 (1,0) | 5 (0,1) | – | – | 3 | – | 1 | 12 | 5 |
| Totals | 24 (4,0) | 239 (1,4) | 215 (10,10) | 51 (2,10) | 14 (1,0) | 41 | 18 | 17 (1,0) | 32 (0,2) | 45 (4,0) | 82 (1,0) | 95 (9,7) | 2 | 31 (4,2) | 179 (4,6) | 120 (4,14) |
| Active pox % | 16.7 | 0.4 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 7.1 | – | – | 5.9 | – | 8.9 | 1.2 | 9.5 | – | 12.9 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| Past pox indicators % | – | 1.7 | 4.7 | 19.6 | – | – | – | – | 6.3 | – | – | 7.4 | – | 6.5 | 3.4 | 11.7 |
| Total pox % | 16.7 | 2.1 | 9.3 | 23.5 | 7.1 | – | – | 5.9 | 6.3 | 8.9 | 1.2 | 16.8 | – | 19.4 | 5.6 | 15 |
Sites abbreviated; Tijeretas = Cerro Tijeretas, Baquerizo = Puerto Baquerizo Moreno (locations within the town center), Opuntias = Jardín de Opuntias, and H.T. = Hacienda Tranquila.
Other species caught included: smooth‐billed ani (Crotophaga ani) (Otoy = 5, Playa Mann = 1), dark‐billed cuckoo (Coccyzus melacoryphus)(Otoy = 1), woodpecker finch (Camarhynchus pallidus) (Otoy = 3, Lobería = 1), grey warbler‐finch (Certhidea fusca) (Otoy = 3, H.T. = 3, Opuntias = 2 (1)), cactus finch (Geospiza scandens) (Opuntias = 11), and San Cristóbal mockingbird (Mimus melanotis) (Playa Mann = 4, Baquerizo = 1, Opuntias = 1, H.T. = 1).
FIGURE 2San Cristóbal Island with study site locations and habitat photos: (a) Playa Mann and Baquerizo are urban sites (in purple); (b) Cerro Tijeretas, Loberia, and Jardín de Opuntias are rural lowland sites (in gold); (c) Hacienda Tranquila and Otoy are highland rural sites (in blue). A white line indicates the main road which traverses the south of the island. Photo credit: (a) Dr. Kiyoko Gotanda
Generalized linear model selection of the top five candidate models for active and past pox infection prevalence in response to whether the year had an El Niño climate (yes/no), or an El Niño climate in the preceding year (yes/no)
| Response | Variables | AICc | dAICc | df | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Pox | El Niño & Site | 276.8 | 0 | 3 | 0.78 |
| El Niño | 280.1 | 3.28 | 2 | 0.15 | |
| El Niño, Host Species & Site | 281.8 | 5.01 | 8 | 0.06 | |
| El Niño & Host Species | 285.9 | 9.11 | 7 | 0.01 | |
| Site | 297.8 | 20.98 | 2 | 0 | |
| Past Pox | El Niño Preceding | 260.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.45 |
| El Niño Preceding & Site | 261 | 0.51 | 3 | 0.35 | |
| El Niño Preceding & Host Species | 263.2 | 2.69 | 7 | 0.12 | |
| El Niño Preceding, Site & Species | 264 | 3.52 | 8 | 0.08 | |
| Intercept | 277.7 | 17.2 | 1 | 0 |
Site (urban or lowland) and host species were included as fixed effects. Final models (bold font) were selected on the basis of the lowest AICc in conjunction with the fewest term, dAICc is relative to the model with the lowest AICc score.
Host species included depended on the available data = medium ground finch, small ground finch, small tree finch, San Cristóbal mockingbird, Galápagos flycatcher,and yellow warbler. Models for active pox use data collected in all years but exclude highland sites which were only sampled in 2019. Models for past pox additionally exclude data from 2016 as past pox incidence was not recorded.
FIGURE 3Predicted pox prevalence in San Cristóbal Island avifauna (medium ground finch, small ground finch, small tree finch, San Cristóbal mockingbird, Galápagos flycatcher, and yellow warbler) dependent on capture site in 2019. Prevalence data plotted from models of active pox and past pox. Significant post‐hoc Tukey test was used for differences between sites denoted by (*p < .05, **p < .01). No significant differences between sites for past pox prevalence as site was not found to be a significant predictor in the final model. Error bars show standard error
FIGURE 4Active pox prevalence in San Cristóbal Island avifauna (four most common species) dependent on climatic conditions. Prevalence data plotted by species in years with El Niño climactic conditions or La Niña conditions. Numbers at the top of the bars indicate number of birds visually screened for pox (n)
FIGURE 5Wing length as predicted for small ground finches caught in 2019 dependent on infection. Black points and error bars are predicted length with standard error. Distribution of the raw data represented by underlayed points. Wing length was significantly longer in individuals with past pox when controlling for variation between site, and accounting for sex, tarsus length, and the day of capture (Appendix S2)
Results of a linear mixed model explaining wing length in small ground finch in 2019 in relation to pox infection
| Fixed Effect | Estimate | SE | df |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 58.2 | 0.42 | 135 | 137.2 | <.001 |
| Infection | |||||
| Active Pox | 0.35 | 0.38 | 391 | 0.9 | .36 |
| Past Pox | 0.87 | 0.28 | 392 | 3.1 | .002 |
| Day | 0.07 | 0.01 | 360 | 7.6 | <.001 |
| Sex (Male) | 1.82 | 0.15 | 393 | 11.9 | <.001 |
| Tarsus | 0.42 | 0.08 | 395 | 5.2 | <.001 |
Fitted random effect of capture site (intercept: SD = 0.97, residual: SD = 1.43), marginal R 2 = 0.38, conditional R 2 = 0.58, p‐values estimated via t‐tests using the Satterthwaite approximations to degrees of freedom.