| Literature DB >> 35003678 |
Jian Huang1,2.
Abstract
The effects of climate change on pest phenology and population size are highly variable. Understanding the impacts of localized climate change on pest distribution and phenology is helpful for improving integrated pest management strategies. Here, the population dynamics of cotton bollworms (Helicoverpa armigera) from Maigaiti County, south Xinjiang, and Shawan County, north Xinjiang, China, were analyzed using a 29-year dataset at lower latitudes and a 23-year dataset at higher latitudes to determine the effects of climate change on the population dynamics of H. armigera. The results showed that all generations of H. armigera at both sites showed increasing trends in population size with climate warming. Abrupt changes in phenology and population number occurred after abrupt temperature changes. Climate change had a greater effect on the phenology of H. armigera at higher latitudes than at lower latitudes and led to a greater increase in population size at lower latitudes than at higher latitudes; the temperature increase at higher latitudes will cause a greater increase in the adult moth population size in the future compared to that at lower latitudes; and abrupt changes in the phenology, temperature increase, and population size at lower latitudes occurred earlier than those at higher latitudes. Thus, it is necessary to develop sustainable management strategies for Helicoverpa armigera at an early stage.Entities:
Keywords: Helicoverpa armigera; abrupt change; climate change; geographical population
Year: 2021 PMID: 35003678 PMCID: PMC8717297 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1Study sites of Maigaiti and Shawan
FIGURE 2Change trends of annual Tmean in Maigaiti (a) and Shawan (b). Blue and green solid lines mean the annual Tmean before and after abrupt change (a), respectively. The abrupt change years in Maigaiti and Shawan were in 2000 and 2010, respectively. The black thin horizontal lines were the mean values
Changes in phenology, sizes, and AT of populations in Maigaiti and Shawan
| Maigaiti | Shawan | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change rate/year | Trends | Change rate/year | Trends | |
| FD in G0 | −0.467* | Advanced | −0.586* | Advanced |
| ED in G0 | 0.208* | Delayed | 0.203 | Delayed |
| PD in G0 | 0.358** | Prolonged | 0.776** | Prolonged |
| FD in G1 | −0.207 | Advanced | −0.259 | Advanced |
| ED in G1 | −0.117 | Advanced | −0.194 | Advanced |
| PD in G1 | −0.090 | Shortened | 0.064 | Prolonged |
| FD in G2 | −0.334* | Advanced | −0.537 | Advanced |
| ED in G2 | 0.271 | Delayed | 0.547 | Delayed |
| PD in G2 | 0.605** | Delayed | 1.084* | Delayed |
| FD in G3 | −0.099 | Advanced | —— | —— |
| ED in G3 | 0.516 | Delayed | —— | —— |
| PD in G3 | 0.614** | Prolonged | —— | —— |
| No. of G0 | 6.352** | Increased | 8.608 | Increased |
| No. of G1 | 21.207 | Increased | 10.331 | Increased |
| No. of G2 | 18.467 | Increased | 27.682 | Increased |
| No. of G3 | 21.312 | Increased | —— | —— |
| Total No. | 67.339 | Increased | 46.621 | Increased |
| AT in G0 | 15.633** | Increased | 16.016* | Increased |
| AT in G1 | 2.883 | Increased | 1.484 | Increased |
| AT in G2 | 16.763** | Increased | 25.799* | Increased |
| AT in G3 | 12.946** | Increased | —— | —— |
| Total AT | 48.225** | Increased | 43.299** | Increased |
“——” represents that there is no this generation adults in Shawan. G0: overwintering generation adults. G1: the first‐generation adults. G2: the second‐generation adults. G3: the third‐generation adults. FD: the first appearance date. ED: the end appearance date. PD: the period days mean from the first appearance date to the end appearance date. AT: accumulated temperature. *p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001. For the “FD, ED and PD,” the “change rate” means “changes in the rates of phenology shift of FD, ED and PD”; and “Trends” means “advanced, delayed or prolonged of phenology.” For the “No. of G0, G1, G2 and G3, and Total No.,” the “change rate” means “changes in the rates of the number of G0, G1, G2 and G3, and total number”; and “Trends” means “increased or decreased of number of moth.” For the “AT and Total AT”, the “change rate” means “changes in the rates of AT of G0, G1, G2 and G3, and total AT”; and “Trends” means “increased or decreased of AT.”
The changes in the number of moth shifts at both sites for a 1°C increase in the AT
| Sites | G0 | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shawan | 0.235 | 0.241 | 0.994* | / |
| Maigaiti | 0.199** | 0.435 | 1.495* | −0.534 |
*p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001.
FIGURE 3Relationships between the moth number of generations and ATs in Shawan and Maigaiti (a–c), and the relationship between the log value of cotton bollworm adults in a year and annual Tmean in Maigaiti (d). The black thin horizontal lines were the mean values
The changes in the number of total moths and G2 at both sites
| Sites | Minimum | Maximum | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shawan | 92 | 2,103 | 860.83 |
| `Maigaiti | 48 | 8,271 | 1,960.76 |
| G2 in Shawan | 39 | 3,439 | 560.43 |
| G2 in Maigaiti | 4 | 3,745 | 747.79 |
FIGURE 4Number, percentages of moth number, AT and percentages of AT of each generation moth in Shawan (a, c, e, g) and Maigaiti (b, d, f, h), respectively
The percentage of each generation to the total number of individuals in a year
| Sites | G0 | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shawan | 18.2% | 22.6% | 58.6% | / |
| Maigaiti | 7.6% | 22.0% | 31.8% | 38.5% |
The mean AT of each generation and total AT both sites (°C)
| Sites | G0 | G1 | G2 | G3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shawan | 787.57 | 870.86 | 1,166.06 | / | 2,428.49 |
| Maigaiti | 720.99 | 919.70 | 742.79 | 738.98 | 3,122.47 |
FIGURE 5Relationship between total moth number and total AT. The black thin horizontal lines were the mean values
The mean percentages of AT in each generation at both sites
| Sites | G0 | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shawan | 28.0% | 31.3% | 40.7% | / |
| Maigaiti | 22.8% | 29.5% | 23.6% | 24.1% |
The increase in the percentages of moths with a 1% increase in AT in each generation at both sites
| Sites | G0 | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shawan | 0.6%* | 1.0%** | 1.1%** | / |
| Maigaiti | 0.3% | −0.2% | 0.3% | 0.7% |
FIGURE 6Relationships between the proportions of moth and the proportions of AT. The black thin horizontal lines were the mean values
Abrupt changes in phenology, numbers of adults, and AT in Maigaiti and Shawan
| Maigaiti | Shawan | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrupt change | Trend after | Abrupt change | Trend after | |
| Year | Abrupt change | Year | Abrupt change | |
| FD in G0 | 1995* | Advanced | 2006* | Advanced |
| ED in G0 | 2013* | Delayed | 2005* | Advanced |
| PD in G0 | 1997* | Prolonged | 2015* | Prolonged |
| FD in G1 | 1993* | Advanced | 2006* | Advanced |
| ED in G1 | 1996 | Advanced | 2007* | Advanced |
| PD in G1 | 1995 | Prolonged | 2011 | Prolonged |
| FD in G2 | 2001* | Advanced | 2007* | Advanced |
| ED in G2 | 1991* | Delayed | 2000* | Delayed |
| PD in G2 | 1994* | Prolonged | 2006* | Prolonged |
| FD in G3 | 2014* | Advanced | _____ | _____ |
| ED in G3 | 1993* | Advanced | _____ | _____ |
| PD in G3 | 1997 | Prolonged | _____ | _____ |
| No.in G0 | 1998* | Increased | 2006* | Increased |
| No.in G1 | 1998* | Increased | 2004* | Increased |
| No.in G2 | 1992* | Increased | 2004* | Increased |
| No.in G3 | 1995* | Increased | _____ | _____ |
| Total No. | 1992* | Increased | 2005* | Increased |
| AT in G0 | 2003* | Increased | 2012 | Increased |
| AT in G1 | 1996* | Increased | 2002 | Increased |
| AT in G2 | 1994* | Increased | 2006* | Increased |
| AT in G3 | 1997* | Increased | _____ | _____ |
| Total AT | 2000* | Increased | 2010 | Increased |
“——” represents that there is no this generation adults in Shawan. G0: overwintering generation adults. G1: the first‐generation adults. G2: the second‐generation adults. G3: the third‐generation adults. FD: the first appearance date. ED: the end appearance date. PD: the period days mean from the first appearance date to the end appearance date. AT: accumulated temperature. Total AT: the sum of AT in G0, G1, and G2 (and G3). *p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001*.
FIGURE 7Relationships between the moth number and the PD. The black thin horizontal lines were the mean values
The mean value of each generation in Maigaiti (1989–2017) and Shawan (1996–2018)
| Maigaiti | Shawan | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of G0 | 91.38 | 132.87 |
| No. of G1 | 466.17 | 167.52 |
| No. of G2 | 747.79 | 560.43 |
| No. of G3 | 655.41 | —— |
|
| 20.92 | 22.71 |
|
| 24.73 | 26.08 |
|
| 25.38 | 22.83 |
|
| 21.52 | —— |
| AT of G0 (°C) | 720.99 | 787.57 |
| AT of G1 (°C) | 919.70 | 870.86 |
| AT of G2 (°C) | 742.79 | 1,166.06 |
| AT of G3 (°C) | 738.98 | —— |
| PD of G0 (day) | 34.45 | 34.69 |
| PD of G1 (day) | 37.03 | 33.49 |
| PD of G2 (day) | 29.31 | 50.99 |
| PD of G3 (day) | 34.45 | —— |
| Proportion of G0 No. (%) | 7.63 | 18.82 |
| Proportion of G1 No. (%) | 22.03 | 22.63 |
| Proportion of G2 No. (%) | 31.82 | 58.55 |
| Proportion of G3 No. (%) | 38.52 | —— |
| Proportion of G0 AT (%) | 22.82 | 28.02 |
| Proportion of G1 AT (%) | 29.50 | 31.28 |
| Proportion of G2 AT (%) | 23.62 | 40.70 |
| Proportion of G3 AT (%) | 24.06 | —— |