| Literature DB >> 35003450 |
Abstract
Judicial scrutiny of the forensic sciences is increasing. This scrutiny targets the bases for expert opinions. Forensic pathologists must understand that when they express an opinion it must have an articulable underlying basis. Iowa v Tyler provides a cautionary tale where testimony from a forensic pathologist on the cause and manner of death based exclusively on police reports and audio and video recordings of police interviews of the suspect rather than on medical evidence were held to be inadmissible. Tyler has an odd and distinguishable set of facts, but has been widely cited as an example of problematic forensic pathology testimony.Entities:
Keywords: Expert opinion; Expert witness; Forensic pathologist; Forensic pathology; Iowa v Tyler; Testimony
Year: 2021 PMID: 35003450 PMCID: PMC8727841 DOI: 10.1177/19253621211060961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acad Forensic Pathol ISSN: 1925-3621