Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Risk factors for computed tomography interpretation discrepancy in emergently transferred patients.

Literature DB >> 35003416

Risk factors for computed tomography interpretation discrepancy in emergently transferred patients.

Hyun Sim Lee¹, Jinwoo Myung², Min Ji Choi¹, Hye Jung Shin³, Incheol Park², Sung Phil Chung², Ji Hoon Kim^2,4.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical

Year: 2022 PMID： 35003416 PMCID： PMC8677922 DOI： 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.001

Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Emerg Med ISSN： 1920-8642

Keyword Cloud
References

× No keyword cloud information.

19 in total

1. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

Authors: Hani H Abujudeh; Giles W Boland; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pavel Rabiner; Elkarn F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 5.315

2. The accuracy of interpretation of emergency abdominal CT in adult patients who present with non-traumatic abdominal pain: results of a UK national audit.

Authors: D C Howlett; K Drinkwater; C Frost; A Higginson; C Ball; G Maskell
Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 2.350

3. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.

Authors: Ghada Issa; Bedros Taslakian; Malak Itani; Eveline Hitti; Nicholas Batley; Miriam Saliba; Fadi El-Merhi
Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 1.990

4. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.

Authors: Christopher Eakins; Wendy D Ellis; Sumit Pruthi; David P Johnson; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Chang Yu; J Herman Kan
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.959

5. Rate and Reasons for Repeat CT Scanning in Transferred Trauma Patients.

Authors: James F Holmes; Blake G Siglock; Michael T Corwin; Michael A Johnson; Edgardo S Salcedo; Gabriel S Espinoza; Ramit Lamba
Journal: Am Surg Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 0.688

6. Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital.

Authors: Omid Khalilzadeh; Maryam Rahimian; Vinay Batchu; Harshna V Vadvala; Robert A Novelline; Garry Choy
Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.630

Risk factors for computed tomography interpretation discrepancy in emergently transferred patients.

1. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

2. The accuracy of interpretation of emergency abdominal CT in adult patients who present with non-traumatic abdominal pain: results of a UK national audit.

3. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.

4. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.

5. Rate and Reasons for Repeat CT Scanning in Transferred Trauma Patients.

6. Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital.

7. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of outpatient head CT scans in an academic neuroradiology practice.

8. Effects of an emergency transfer coordination center on secondary overtriage in an emergency department.

9. Pretransfer CT scans are frequently performed, but rarely helpful in rural trauma systems.

10. Outside CT imaging among emergency department transfer patients.