Literature DB >> 35003285

Venetoclax with Azacitidine Induced Tumor Lysis Syndrome in an Elderly Patient with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report.

Mihee Kim1, Hyun-Jin Bang1, Ga-Young Song1, Seo-Yeon Ahn1, Sung-Hoon Jung1, Yong-Su Song2, Jae-Sook Ahn1,3.   

Abstract

Combination treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax is being used increasingly in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax with HMAs has been reported to be associated with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in AML patients with high leukemic burden. We present a case of an elderly AML patient with low leukemic burden who developed TLS while receiving venetoclax and azacitidine (AZA). A 74-year-old man with newly diagnosed AML with NPM1 mutation received combination therapy with venetoclax and AZA in an outpatient clinic. Within 12 hours after starting venetoclax and AZA, the patient was admitted to the emergency room with fever, general weakness, and laboratory findings consistent with TLS. Based on our results, we recommend monitoring at the start of the treatment with venetoclax and HMAs to prevent and control TLS regardless of the leukemic burden and favorable genetic risk.
Copyright © 2021 Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Azacitidine; Tumor lysis syndrome; Venetoclax

Year:  2021        PMID: 35003285      PMCID: PMC8715223          DOI: 10.5049/EBP.2021.19.2.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrolyte Blood Press        ISSN: 1738-5997


INTRODUCTION

Combination treatment of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax is being used increasingly in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy123). Venetoclax has been widely associated with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, TLS after combination treatment with venetoclax and HMAs is rare in AML patients456). TLS is a potentially life-threatening complication following the administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is caused by release of intracellular components into the bloodstream by rapid destruction of tumor cells, resulting in electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities78). We present a case of an elderly patient with AML who developed TLS despite the low leukemic burden and favorable risk profile during treatment with venetoclax and azacitidine (AZA).

CASE REPORT

A 74-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented with chronic fatigue. Initial complete blood count (CBC) revealed pancytopenia (white blood cell [WBC] count: 1.5 × 103/L, hemoglobin: 7.2 g/dL, and platelet count: 104 × 103/µL). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was within the normal range (357 IU/L, normal: 218-472 IU/L). Laboratory findings of blood chemistry (potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and creatine kinase) were within the normal range (Table 1). Peripheral blood smear showed normocytic normochromic anemia with a left shift to myelocytes. A bone marrow biopsy was performed with the suspicion of a hematologic malignancy or marrow failure syndrome. Initial bone marrow aspiration revealed 87.5% myeloblasts and hypercellular marrow for age (70% cellularity). The immunophenotype was compatible with AML with expression of CD33 (93.3%), CD117 (99.3%), and myeloperoxidase (98.7%).
Table 1

Laboratory findings related to tumor lysis syndrome according to the course of treatment

Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; FDPs, fibrin degradation products.

The patient received combination therapy consisting of venetoclax 200 mg daily with a ramp-up dosing schedule (100 mg on day 1 and 200 mg on day 2, with subsequent continuation of the 200 mg/day) continuously for 28 days and 75 mg/m2 of AZA from day 1 to day 7 in cycle 1 (Fig. 1). Venetoclax was administered with concomitant fluconazole 200 mg and levofloxacin 500 mg for antifungal and anti-bacterial prophylaxis. Considering his good performance status and low disease burden (low WBC count and normal LDH level), the patient received chemotherapy in an outpatient clinic. He experienced fatigue and fever at 6 hours after starting venetoclax with AZA. Within 12 hours, the patient was admitted to the emergency room with fever and general weakness. Blood tests showed hyperuricemia (8.3 mg/dL, normal: 1-7 mg/dL), marked elevation in the LDH level (17,822 IU/L), 25% increase of phosphorous (4.0 mg/dL) from baseline (3.0 mg/dL, normal: 2.5-5.5 mg/dL), and severe leukopenia (0.4 × 103/L). In urinalysis, urine pH showed 6.0 (5.0-8.0). The laboratory findings were consistent with the Cairo-Bishop criteria for the diagnosis of TLS (Table 1, Fig. 1)9). Rasburicase 6 mg and massive hydration with intravenous fluids were initiated for the treatment of TLS. AZA and venetoclax were stopped on days 2-4 and the first cycle of chemotherapy was restarted after resolution of TLS on day 5 (Fig. 1). CBC recovered at 32 days after starting the therapy (WBC count: 7.9 × 103/L, absolute neutrophil count: 6.02 × 103/L, hemoglobin level: 11.7 g/dL, and platelet count: 335 × 103/µL). Follow-up bone marrow biopsy showed complete remission (CR) with a blast rate of 2.5% after the first cycle of combination treatment with venetoclax and AZA. Initial cytogenetic analysis showed a normal karyotype, and next-generation sequencing revealed NPM1 mutations with 32.4% of variant allelic fractions without FLT3-ITD. The final diagnosis of the patient was AML with mutated NPM1, which has a favorable prognosis.
Fig. 1

Dynamics in laboratory finding related to tumor lysis syndrome according to the course of treatment.

Abbreviations: P, Inorganic phosphorous; WBC, white blood cell count; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

DISCUSSION

Venetoclax with HMAs is a new standard treatment for older patients with AML1011). Reportedly, venetoclax with HMAs improved the median overall survival from 9.6 to 14.1 months when compared with HMAs alone12). TLS occurrence is uncommon in AML during intensive induction chemotherapy (12% incidence of laboratory TLS and 5% of clinical TLS). Venetoclax has been widely associated with TLS in up to 13.4% of the cases of CLL13). However, venetoclax with HMAs showed a 2.5% incidence of laboratory TLS in AML and clinical TLS was rarely reported1415). Despite the low incidence of TLS during combination treatment with venetoclax and HMAs in elderly AML patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend a ramp-up dosing schedule of venetoclax to mitigate the risk of TLS. The guidelines also suggest prophylactic hydration, administration of anti-hyperuricemic drugs before to the first dose of venetoclax, and monitoring of blood chemistry at 6-8 hours after each new dose ramp-up14). These recommendations were possibly due to the design of phase 1b trials, which had strict ramp-up dosing schedules for venetoclax and close monitoring for TLS considering its high prevalence in CLL16). Potential reasons for the higher incidence of TLS in CLL than that in AML may include differences in disease status. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, has been used in refractory CLL patients and in patients who relapsed after B cell receptor pathway inhibitor treatment and showed rapid progression of the disease. TLS could be a consequence of the potency of venetoclax in inducing apoptosis of CLL cells17). A novel anti-leukemic effect was observed during combination treatment with venetoclax and HMAs in AML due to inhibition of anti-apoptosis as well as the potential to eliminate leukemic stem cells3). This finding may explain why TLS is rarely reported in association with combination treatment of venetoclax and HMAs when compared with intensive induction therapy in AML. Although TLS is uncommon in AML116), there are a few reports of TLS in AML during treatment with venetoclax and HMAs45). We have reported a rare case of TLS induced by venetoclax and AZA treatment in an elderly AML patient with low leukemic burden and favorable European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk profile. Previously reported cases included AML with intermediate to poor ELN risk profile, AML with mutated ASXL1, refractory AML with complex karyotype and mutated ASXL1, and AML secondary to myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms45). Four out of six previous cases received strong CYP3A inhibitors for antifungal prophylaxis and could not achieve CR after combination treatment with venetoclax and HMAs45). A possible explanation for the risk of TLS in these cases was the patients’ disease burden based on genetic profiling, peripheral circulating blasts, serum LDH level, and poor performance score. However, our patient had a favorable genomic profile (NPM1 mutation) compared to other cases (ASXL1, RUNX1, and TET2 mutations)5). Additionally, CR was achieved after the first cycle of treatment with venetoclax and AZA. We inferred that multiple factors such as comorbidities, performance score, disease burden, and baseline renal function could be the unexpected consequences of TLS in elderly AML patients. Keruakous et al. reported that TLS was more prominent during treatment with strong/moderate CYP3A inhibitors for fungal prophylaxis at initiation and during the ramp-up phase of venetoclax, since concomitant use of venetoclax and strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors increases venetoclax exposure412). Recent studies of drug-drug interaction between “azole” antifungal agents and venetoclax provided guidance for dose reduction of venetoclax in cases of concomitant use of antifungal agents1418). However, most of these studies focused on strong CYP3A inhibitors such as posaconazole and voriconazole. Thus, information regarding the efficacy and drug interactions between moderate CYP3A inhibitors and venetoclax is insufficient. Compared to other cases of TLS, our patient received moderate CYP3A inhibitors (fluconazole 200 mg) and venetoclax was started at a dose of 100 mg with subsequent dose ramp-up. Further evaluation of appropriate venetoclax dose reduction when used with moderate CYP3A inhibitors is necessary to manage potential interactions with CYP3A inhibitors, reduce potential TLS complications, and ensure efficacy. In conclusion, the present report describes a rare case of TLS after combination treatment with venetoclax and AZA in an elderly AML patient with favorable risk profile. The patient had a low leukemic burden at the start of chemotherapy and was at a low risk of TLS (WBC count below 25 × 109/L and LDH level below twice the upper limit of normal). The time to TLS onset was within 12 h after receiving the first dose of venetoclax with AZA. Based on our results, we recommend close monitoring at the start of treatment with venetoclax and HMAs to prevent and manage TLS regardless of the leukemic burden at the start of chemotherapy.
  17 in total

1.  Tumor lysis syndrome: current perspective.

Authors:  Jessica Hochberg; Mitchell S Cairo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Tumor Lysis Syndrome.

Authors:  Shelly M Williams; Anthony A Killeen
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Management of Venetoclax-Posaconazole Interaction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Evaluation of Dose Adjustments.

Authors:  Suresh K Agarwal; Courtney D DiNardo; Jalaja Potluri; Martin Dunbar; Hagop M Kantarjian; Rod A Humerickhouse; Shekman L Wong; Rajeev M Menon; Marina Y Konopleva; Ahmed Hamed Salem
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Tumor lysis syndrome risk in outpatient versus inpatient administration of venetoclax and hypomethlators for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ari Pelcovits; Jozal Moore; Brianna Bakow; Rabin Niroula; Pamela Egan; John L Reagan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Andrew W Roberts; Matthew S Davids; John M Pagel; Brad S Kahl; Soham D Puvvada; John F Gerecitano; Thomas J Kipps; Mary Ann Anderson; Jennifer R Brown; Lori Gressick; Shekman Wong; Martin Dunbar; Ming Zhu; Monali B Desai; Elisa Cerri; Sari Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; William G Wierda; John F Seymour
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Venetoclax for AML: changing the treatment paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel A Pollyea; Maria Amaya; Paolo Strati; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-23

7.  Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Keith Pratz; Vinod Pullarkat; Brian A Jonas; Martha Arellano; Pamela S Becker; Olga Frankfurt; Marina Konopleva; Andrew H Wei; Hagop M Kantarjian; Tu Xu; Wan-Jen Hong; Brenda Chyla; Jalaja Potluri; Daniel A Pollyea; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Brian A Jonas; Vinod Pullarkat; Michael J Thirman; Jacqueline S Garcia; Andrew H Wei; Marina Konopleva; Hartmut Döhner; Anthony Letai; Pierre Fenaux; Elizabeth Koller; Violaine Havelange; Brian Leber; Jordi Esteve; Jianxiang Wang; Vlatko Pejsa; Roman Hájek; Kimmo Porkka; Árpád Illés; David Lavie; Roberto M Lemoli; Kazuhito Yamamoto; Sung-Soo Yoon; Jun-Ho Jang; Su-Peng Yeh; Mehmet Turgut; Wan-Jen Hong; Ying Zhou; Jalaja Potluri; Keith W Pratz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  BCL-2 family proteins as 5-Azacytidine-sensitizing targets and determinants of response in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  J M Bogenberger; S M Kornblau; W E Pierceall; R Lena; D Chow; C-X Shi; J Mantei; G Ahmann; I M Gonzales; A Choudhary; R Valdez; J Camoriano; V Fauble; R E Tiedemann; Y H Qiu; K R Coombes; M Cardone; E Braggio; H Yin; D O Azorsa; R A Mesa; A K Stewart; R Tibes
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  How we use venetoclax with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian A Jonas; Daniel A Pollyea
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.