| Literature DB >> 35002954 |
Peiliang Lin1,2, Faya Liang1,2, Jingliang Ruan1,3, Ping Han1,2, Jianwei Liao1,4, Renhui Chen1,2, Baoming Luo1,3, Nengtai Ouyang1,4, Xiaoming Huang1,2.
Abstract
Background: High-volume lymph node metastasis (HVLNM, equal to or more than 5 lymph nodes) is one of the adverse features indicating high recurrence risk in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and is recommended as one of the indications of completion thyroidectomy for patients undergoing thyroid lobectomy at first. In this study, we aim to develop a preoperative nomogram for the prediction of HVLNMs in the central compartment in PTC (cT1-2N0M0), where preoperative imaging techniques perform poor.Entities:
Keywords: lymphatic metastasis; neck; nomograms; reoperation; thyroid papillary carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002954 PMCID: PMC8729159 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.753678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Clinicopathological characteristics of the included patients.
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| No. of patients | 423 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 77 (18.2%) |
| Female | 346 (81.8%) |
| Age (years) | 47.0 ± 12.2 |
| </=35 years | 85 (20.1%) |
| >35 years | 338 (79.9%) |
| BRAF with V600E mutated | 372 (87.9%) |
| Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | 112 (26.5%) |
| US Characteristics | |
| Multifocality | |
| No focus with TIRADS of 4c/5 | 224 (53.0%) |
| Single focus with TIRADS of 4c/5 | 94 (22.2%) |
| Multiple Foci with TIRADS of 4c/5 | 105 (24.8%) |
| TIRADS of 4a/4b/4c/5 | 31/78/49/265 |
| Diameter/mm | 9.8 (6.5, 15.5) |
| Composition | |
| Mixed composition | 8 (1.9%) |
| Solid composition | 415 (98.1%) |
| Shape | |
| A/T > 1 | 157 (37.1%) |
| A/T </= 1 | 266 (62.9%) |
| Echogenicity | |
| Hyperechogenicity | 3 (0.7%) |
| Isoechogenicity | 114 (27.0%) |
| Hypoechogenicity | 274 (64.8%) |
| Marked hypoechogenicity | 32 (7.6%) |
| Margin | |
| Well-circumscribed Margin | 202 (47.8%) |
| Microlobulated Margin | 212 (50.1%) |
| Irregular Margin | 9 (2.1%) |
| Calcification | |
| No Calcifications | 153 (36.2%) |
| Macrocalcifications | 202 (47.8%) |
| Microcalcifications | 60 (14.2%) |
| Rim Calcification | 8 (1.9%) |
| Vascularity Pattern | |
| Absence | 252 (59.6%) |
| Perinodular | 37 (8.7%) |
| Intranodular | 127 (30.0%) |
| Perinodular and intranodular | 7 (1.7%) |
| SMF at inferior part of thyroid lobe | 56 (13.2%) |
| SMF at superior part of thyroid lobe | 90 (21.3%) |
| Pathological Features | |
| T status of T1a/T1b/T2 | 259/114/50 |
| Diameter/mm | 9 (6, 14) |
| Multifocality | 255 (60.3%) |
| N status of N0/N1a | 238/185 |
| Dissected Lymph Nodes | 5 (2, 9) |
| Positive Lymph Nodes | 0 (0, 2) |
| HVCLNMs/cases | 57 (13.4%) |
A/T, the anteroposterior dimension divided by its transverse dimension; HVCLNMs, high-volume central lymph node metastasis (equal to or more than 5 lymph nodes); SMF, suspicious malignant foci; TIRADS, thyroid imaging report and data system; US, ultrasonography.
The results of logistic regression analysis.
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age (years) | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| </=35 | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
| >35 | 0.159 (0.088,0.288) | <0.001 | 0.095 (0.046,0.193) | <0.001 |
| Gender | 0.184 | |||
| Female | 1 (reference) | |||
| Male | 1.566 (0.808, 3.034) | 0.184 | ||
| BRAF with V600E mutated | 4.251 (1.005, 17.988) | 0.049 | 14.363 (2.847, 72.463) | 0.001 |
| Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | 1.610 (0.890, 2.913) | 0.116 | ||
| US Characteristics | ||||
| Multiple Suspicious Malignant Foci | 0.040 | |||
| No focus with TIRADS of 4c/5 | 1 (reference) | |||
| Single focus with TIRADS of 4c/5 | 2.556 (1.149,5.685) | 0.021 | ||
| Multiple Foci with TIRADS of 4c/5 | 1.443 (0.545, 3.825) | 0.460 | ||
| TIRADS of 4a/4b/4c/5 | 0.056 | |||
| 4a | 1 (reference) | |||
| 4b | 3.429 (0.411,28.632) | 0.255 | ||
| 4c | 1.957 (0.194,19.700) | 0.569 | ||
| 5 | 6.136 (0.816, 46.166) | 0.078 | ||
| Diameter/mm | 1.027 (0.997, 1.058) | 0.073 | 1.040 (1.003, 1.079) | 0.035 |
| Solid composition | 1.092 (0.132, 9.044) | 0.935 | ||
| A/T > 1 | 0.754 (0.415, 1.369) | 0.353 | ||
| Echogenicity | 0.133 | |||
| Isoechogenicity | 1 (reference) | |||
| Hyperechogenicity | 0.000† | 0.999 | ||
| Hypoechogenicity | 1.840 (0.915, 3.702) | 0.087 | ||
| Marked hypoechogenicity | 0.302 (0.038, 2.433) | 0.261 | ||
| Margin | 0.111 | |||
| Well-circumscribed | 1 (reference) | |||
| Irregular | 1.861 (1.037, 3.340) | 0.037 | ||
| Microlobulated | 1.137 (0.135, 9.567) | 0.906 | ||
| Calcification | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| None | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||
| Microcalcification | 8.484 (3.278, 21.956) | <0.001 | 11.221 (4.019, 31.325) | <0.001 |
| Macrocalcification | 3.289 (0.964, 11.219) | 0.057 | 4.982 (1.306, 19.006) | 0.019 |
| Rim Calcification | 4.229 (0.434, 41.215) | 0.215 | 13.044 (1.196, 142.202) | 0.035 |
| Vascularity Pattern | 0.791 | |||
| Absence | 1 (reference) | |||
| Perinodular | 0.529 (0.154, 1.815) | 0.312 | ||
| Intranodular | 0.991 (0.538, 1.825) | 0.976 | ||
| Perinodular and intranodular | 0.000† | 0.999 | ||
| SMF at inferior part of thyroid lobe | 1.952 (0.959, 3.971) | 0.065 | ||
| SMF at superior part of thyroid lobe | 1.386 (0.729, 2.633) | 0.319 | ||
†No cases had high-volume central lymph node metastasis in these subgroups.
A/T, the anteroposterior dimension divided by its transverse dimension; SMF, suspicious malignant foci; TIRADS, thyroid imaging report and data system; US, ultrasonography.
Figure 1Nomogram to predict high-volume lymph node metastasis in the central compartment (equal to or more than 5 lymph nodes). A 32-year-old (about 87.5 points) patient who has a malignant focus of 20 mm (about 30.0 points) with BRAF V600E mutation (100.0 points) and microcalcification (about 90.0 points) would get a total of about 307.5 points, which implies a near 0.70 risk for HVCLNMs. The bottom line indicating the risk of HVCLNMs is given as logarithm. HVCLNMs, high-volume central lymph node metastasis.
Figure 2Receiver operator curves of the nomogram.
Figure 3Calibration plot of the nomogram. The x-axis is the nomogram-predicted probability of high-volume central compartment lymph node metastasis (HVCLNMs). The y-axis is the actual probability of HVCLNMs. Dashed line = ideal nomogram; dotted line = apparent predicted accuracy; solid line = calibration estimate from the internally validated model. Perfect prediction would correspond to the dashed line.