| Literature DB >> 35002569 |
Qingsong Tao1, Ting Zhu1, Xiaoqin Ge1, Shengping Gong1, Jianxin Guo1.
Abstract
In order to study the application value of spiral CT lung density measurement software in the diagnosis of radioactive lung injury, the average CT values of lung apex, hilum, and diaphragm were measured by Pulmo automatic evaluation software of 16-slice spiral CT in 96 patients with different types of radiation lung injury diagnosed by conventional CT and 80 healthy subjects. The radiation lung injury on CT slices was classified, and the lung density was measured. In 96 patients with different types of radiation lung injury, 56 patients had different degrees of increase in average lung density, which was most obvious in the type of air insufficiency and chronic fibrosis. CT values of lung density in the ground glass stage and patch stage of acute radiation pneumonia had little influence due to the range and time of exposure. The lung density of 35 patients with radiation injury was measured in the normal range. There was a significant difference between normal lung density and abnormal lung density in different types of radiation lung injury (X 2 = 56.718, P < 0.001). The mean lung density of 68 cases was normal and that of 12 cases was abnormal. There was a significant difference in lung density between the lung injury group and the normal group (X 2 = 18.027, P < 0.001). Spiral CT lung density measurement can accurately evaluate the lung density values of different types of radiation lung injury and judge the correlation between lung density and different types of radiation lung injury. It is of great value to diagnose, locate, and master the radiation dose of different types of radiation lung injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002569 PMCID: PMC8712136 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9305508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Lung density measurement results of the radiation-induced lung injury group and physical examination group.
| Damage type | Normal lung density group | Abnormal lung density group |
|---|---|---|
| Sheet exudation type | 15 | 0 |
| Patch reality type | 25 | 0 |
| Aerated incomplete type | 7 | 18 |
| Chronic fibrosis type | 68 | 25 |
| TiJianZu | 6 | 22 |
| Combined meter | 121 | 55 |
Comparison of the respiratory air VD and inspiratory MLD index of the two groups of subjects.
| Group | Whole lung VD | The whole lung MLD | Lung on MLD | In the lung MLD | The lung MLD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The team | 93.6 ± 37.3 | −918.6 ± 40.1 | −944.9 ± 32.9 | −893.4 ± 31.6 | −921.3 ± 29.7 |
| The control group | 202.4 ± 39.1 | −761.2 ± 49.8 | −811.9 ± 38.5 | −775.7 ± 40.3 | −734.7 ± 43.4 |
Analysis of the measurement status of different types of average lung density in patients with emphysema.
| Group | Emphysema type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single lung bullae type | Lobule center type | By the interval type | Irregular shape | Central lobule type | |
| Normal | 2 (100.0) | 3 (100.0) | 2 (25.0) | 4 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
| Abnormal | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (75.0) | 8 (66.7) | 4 (80.0) |
Figure 1The difference of indices such as breathing gas VD and inspiratory gas MLD.