| Literature DB >> 35002437 |
Hala M N Tolba1, Azza Abo Elmaaty2, Gamelat Kotb Farag3, Doaa A Mansou4, Hend A Elakkad5.
Abstract
In veterinary medicine plant based medicine is achieving a huge importance worldwide. This research was subjected to rectify the hydrophilic Moringa Oleifera alcoholic leaves extract could improve the immune system in vaccinated and non-vaccinated broiler Hubbard chickens experimentally exposed to Newcastle disease (ND) virus. Seventy five chicks with age one day old were splitted randomly into five groups equally in distribution with fifteen chick in each group. Group I was untreated unvaccinated (control negative group) while group IV was infected group with NDV (control positive group). The experimental Groups II and V were given daily oral treatment of hydrophilic alcoholic leaves extract of M. oleifera at 200 mg/kg body weight until day 21 of age while groups III and V were ND vaccinated with La Sota strain of ND vaccines. The four groups (II, III, IV, V) were infected with ND virus velogenic strain (VNDV) on day 21. Following to infection, Monitoring of birds were done daily for clinical signs, postmortem examination, morbidity and mortality. Cellular, humeral immune response and phagocytic activity were evaluated and the data were statistically analyzed using (SPSS). Total and differential cell numbers as well as Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titre increased in the extract treated and vaccinated group which give total protection against NDV much more than treated and unvaccinated group. As a result it could be recommended to use M. Olifera extract from the first day of rearing in Hubbard chicken with ND vaccination program as a prophylactic treatment in protection of birds against ND infection.Entities:
Keywords: Broilers; Immunity; Moringa Oleifera; Phagocytic activity; Velogenic Newcastle disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002437 PMCID: PMC8717170 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
The primers used for detection of M gene of Newcatle diseae virus.
| Virus | Gene | Primer/probe sequence 5′-3′ | Amplified Segment (bp) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND | M | 121 | ||
Results of phytochemical analyses of Moringa oleifera.
| Compounds | Presence in methanol extract |
|---|---|
| Alkaloid | + |
| Saponin | ++ |
| Tannins | – |
| Glycoside | ++ |
| Flavonoid | + |
| Steroid | +++ |
| Terpenes | – |
| Fats and Oil | + |
| Reducing Sugar | ++ |
+ present in low concentration, ++ present with moderate concentration, +++ present in high concentration and – mean abscent.
The HI antibody titers in vaccinated chickens with Newcastle vaccine before and after challenge and vaccination.
| Groups | 14 day post vaccination | 21 day post vaccination | 14 day post challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
Effect of oral administration of Moringa hydro alcoholic extract (200 mg/kg b.wt) once daily for 21 successive days on total leukocytic count, lymphocyte, neutrophil, basophile and eosinophil.
| Groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| parameters | |||||||
| At zero time | TLC(103/μl) | 79.2 ± 0.14 d | 80.04 ± 0.02 c | 82.6 ± 0.11 a | 81.4 ± 0.11 b | 82.4 ± 0.23 a | |
| lymphocyte | 70.5 ± 0.14 d | 72.3 ± 0.05 b | 73.1 ± 0.05 a | 72.1 ± 0.08 b | 71.1 ± 0.08 c | ||
| Neutrophil | 2.1 ± 0.28 c | 2.8 ± 0.20 a, b | 3.2 ± 0.14 a | 2.5 ± .18 b c | 3.1 ± 0.05 a b | ||
| basophil | 5.1 ± 0.05 a | 5.3 ± 0.05 a | 5.2 ± 0.05 a | 5.1 ± 0.29 a | 5.2 ± 0.05 a | ||
| eosinophil | 2.1 ± 0.05 b | 2.3 ± 0.05 b | 2.6 ± 0.05 a | 2.2 ± 0.05 b | 2.2 ± 0.12 b | ||
| 1st week | TLC (103/μl) | 79.30 ± 0.05 a | 60.4 ± 0.14 c | 61.4 ± 0.05 c | 40.2 ± 0.12 d | 75.5 ± 1.2 b | |
| lymphocyte | 72.2 ± 0.11 a | 60.8 ± 0.03 c | 61.2 ± 0.14 c | 4 5.1 ± 0.08 d | 70.2 ± 0.60 b | ||
| Neutrophil | 2.2 ± 0.05 a | 1.3 ± 0.08 c | 1.3 ± 0.08 c | 0.6 ± 0.04 d | 1.9 ± 0.05 b | ||
| basophil | 5.2 ± 0.15 a | 3.2 ± 0.12 b | 3.1 ± 0.08 b | 1.9 ± 0.05 c | 5.00 ± 0.05 a | ||
| eosinophil | 2.5 ± 0.21 a | 1.3 ± 0.08 b | 1.4 ± 0.05 b | 0.6 ± 0.02 c | 2.2 ± 0.15 a | ||
| 2nd week | TLC (103/μl) | 80.4 ± 0.21 a | 66.06 ± 0.29 c | 66.6 ± 0.43 c | 38.86 ± 0.47 d | 78.6 ± 0.35 b | |
| lymphocyte | 72.4 ± 0.2 a | 63.5 ± 0.14 c | 63.8 ± 0.05 c | 43.1 ± 0.05 d | 70.9 ± 0.12 b | ||
| Neutrophil | 2.3 ± 0.12 a | 1.4 ± 0.05 c | 1.3 ± 0.06 c | 0.4 ± 0.1 d | 1.9 ± 0.05 b | ||
| basophil | 5.2 ± 0.14 a | 4.6 ± 0.08 b | 4.6 ± 0.06 b | 1.7 ± 0.05 c | 5.1 ± 0.05 a | ||
| eosinophil | 2.2 ± 0.2 a | 1.7 ± 0.08 b,c | 1.6 ± 0.05 c | 0.5 ± 0.02 d | 2.00 ± 0.05 a,b |
The phagocytic index of the birds experimentally treated with Moringa Oleifera and Newcastle vaccine.
| Groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.45 ± 0.03a,b | 0.44 ± .05b | 0.45 ± .05b,a | 0.46 ± .05a | 0.46 ± 0.03a,b | |
| 0.46 ± 0.03e | 0.64 ± .03b | 0.61 ± .03c | 0.51 ± .03d | 0.82 ± 0.05a | |
| 0.44 ± 0.01e | 0.61 ± .01b | 0.58 ± .03c | 0.49 ± 0.03d | 0.79 ± 0.05a | |
The phagocytic percentage of the birds experimentally treated with Moringa Oleifera and Newcastle vaccine.
| 41 %±.3b | 41%±.3b | 41%±.2b | 40%±.3b | 42%±0.3a | |
| 41%±0.3 e | 46%± .2b | 44%±.3c | 43%±0.1 d | 64%±.3a | |
| 40%±0.3 e | 44%±.1b | 42%±.3c | 41%±0.3 d | 57%±.3a | |
The phagocytic percentage = Number of PMN that have engulfed bacteria /Number of PMN counted.
Fig. 1Microscopical examination of phagocytic index of Macrophage cells three days after experiments. Group (1): showing normal phagocytic ability of Macrophage cells. (control −ve), Group II: showing increase in the mean number of Saccharomyces cerevisiae per Macrophage cells due to pretreatment of plant in virus infected group. Group III: showing effect of virus and vaccine in increase phagocytic capacity of Macrophage. Group IV: showing effect of virus presence in the mean number of Saccharomyces cerevisiae per Macrophage cells. (control +ve) and Group V: showing the highest phagocytic ability of macrophage cells related to synergistic effect of virus, vaccine and plant.
Showed the shedding of the NDV from oropharengeal and cloacal swabs in experimental infected Hubbard chickens:
| Groups | 3 days post challenge | 5 days post challenge | 7 days post challenge | 9 days post challenge | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log10EID50 | CT | Log10EID50 | CT | Log10EID50 | CT | Log10EID50 | CT | |||||
| OPa | clb | OPa | clb | OPa | clb | OPa | clb | |||||
| I | 5.2 ± 0.17 | 4.6 ± 0.15 | 29.3 ± 1.57 | 4.0 ± 0.21 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | 31.73 ± 0.31 | 2.0 ± 0.13 | 1.0 ± 0.18 | 33.34 ± 0.98 | – | – | 34.62 ± 2.87 |
| II | 5.7 ± 0.31 | 4.4 ± 0.21 | 28.7 ± 2.12 | 4.3 ± 0.31 | 3.3 ± 0.11 | 30.21 ± 0.31 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | 1.0 ± 0.31 | 32.0 ± 0.98 | – | – | 33.7 ± 0.57 |
| III | 4.3 ± 0.15 | 3.9 ± 0.15 | 31.0 ± 1.64 | 3.2 ± 0.11 | 2.5 ± 0.07 | 32.1 ± 0.18 | 1.5 ± 0.13 | 1.0 ± 0.07 | 33.34 ± 1.47 | – | – | 34.62 ± 1.89 |
| IV | 5.0 ± 0.21 | 4.3 ± 0.21 | 30.7 ± 0.98 | 3.5 ± 0.11 | 2.9 ± 0.05 | 32.0 ± 0.31 | 1.8 ± 0.31 | 1.0 ± 0.13 | 33.18 ± 0.57 | – | – | 34.05 ± 2.87 |
| V | 4.9 ± 0.07 | 4.4 ± 0.21 | 29.8 ± 1.57 | 4.0 ± 0.07 | 3.0 ± 0.11 | 32.85 ± 0.18 | 2.0 ± 0.21 | 1.0 ± 0.13 | 33.92 ± 1.02 | – | – | 34.62 ± 1.49 |
± Means standard error within the same row carrying different superscript were significantly different at P value < 0.05.