| Literature DB >> 35002392 |
Mohamed Farouk Elsadek1, Alyah Almoajel1, Mohammed Fawzi Farahat1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the anti-inflammatory effects of ribes rubrum oil at three different doses (5, 10 and 15 ml/kg b.w/day) in adult male albino rats with indomethacin-induced stomach ulcers (IND). Forty rats (135 ± 5 g) categorized into 5 groups (n = 8), for 45 days. Group (1) normal control, thirty-two rats were gavaged IND as single oral dose (30 mg/Kg b.w) resulted in gastric ulcer, then distributed to four groups, group (2) IND-intoxicated control, Groups 3, 4 and 5 were administrated ribes rubrum oil at levels of (5, 10 & 15 ml/kg b.w) respectively. Administrated levels of ribes rubrum oil found to have remarkable elevation in food conversion efficiency in experimental rats, gastric juice pH, in compared to the drunken control group, gastric prostaglandin E2 and gastric cytochrome P450 reductase levels were lower. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines NO, TNF-, and IL-1 were dramatically reduced, which was related with an increase in blood hemoglobin (Hb), packed cell volume (PCV), and red blood cells (RBCs)in ulcerogenic rats compared to intoxicated control. Data showed that, the main components of ribes rubrum oil are β-Pinene, γ-linolenic and Linalool oxide levels (25.9%, 23.10% and 10.5%, respectively) for their antioxidant activity. Findings showed that administrate ribes rubrum oil at dose 15 ml/kg followed by 10 ml/kg had the best results against ulcerogenic rats. In conclusion, the outcomes are consistent with the concept that ribes rubrum oil had a gastroprotective and antisecretory effects against gastric ulcer that may be attributed to the antioxidant properties of the oil that ameliorates the damage occur in gastric of rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Indomethacin; Ribes rubrum oil; Ulcer index; γ-linolenic acid
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002392 PMCID: PMC8716960 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Chromatography analysis of ribes rubrum oil (GC/GC–MS).
| Component | Content (%) |
|---|---|
| 1,8-Cineol | 4.6 |
| 25.9 | |
| Linalool oxide | 10.5 |
| Myristicin | 2.17 |
| α-Epi bisabolol | 3.55 |
| γ-linolenic | 23.10 |
Food conversion efficiency in normal and IND administrated groups.
| Groups | Normal Control | Intoxicated Control | Treated with RRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 5 ml/kg | 10 ml/kg | 15 ml/kg | ||
| Initial weight (g) | 120.31 ± 3.45 a | 122.24 ± 4.55 a | 123.21 ± 3.55 a | 121.36 ± 4.77 a | 124.31 ± 5.01 a |
| Final weight (g) | 236.08 ± 27.17 a | 189.13 ± 17.37b** | 226.35 ± 22.53 a | 230.08 ± 20.13 a | 232.31 ± 22.34 a |
| Weight gain (g) | 115.77 ± 8.11 a | 66.89 ± 6.11b** | 103.14 ± 9.13 a | 105.77 ± 9.17 a | 108.14 ± 10.15 a |
| Food intake (g/w) | 15.32 ± 2.14 a | 13.55 ± 2.55 a | 15.45 ± 2.42 a | 15.71 ± 2.71 a | 15.81 ± 2.14 a |
| 0.125 ± 0.01 a | 0.082 ± 0.03b** | 0.111 ± 0.02 a | 0.112 ± 0.05 a | 0.113 ± 0.01 a | |
* Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. n = 8 rats/group.
**Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT)
FER: Food efficiency ratio, RRO: Ribes Rubrum Oil.
pH, volume of gastric secretion, ulcer index and Curative ratio% of normal and IND administrated groups.
| Groups | Normal Control | Intoxicated Control | Treated with RRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 5 ml/kg | 10 ml/kg | 15 ml/kg | ||
| PH | 4.17 ± 0.53 a*** | 2.03 ± 0.41c | 3.34 ± 0.17b | 3.69 ± 0.39b | 4.08 ± 0.24b |
| Volume of gastric juice (1 ml) | 2.14 ± 0.08b** | 5.05 ± 0.16 a*** | 1.53 ± 0.16c | 1.87 ± 0.25c | 2.07 ± 0.14b |
| Ulcer index (mm) | 7.93 ± 0.94 a*** | 2.18 ± 0.14c | 2.37 ± 0.38b | 3.57 ± 0.47b | |
| Curative ratio% | – | – | 54.13 ± 4.16 a | 68.44 ± 6.89 a | 75.25 ± 2.47 a |
* Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. n = 8 rats/group.
**Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).
Hemoglobin (HB), packed cell (PCV) and Red blood cells (RBCs) of normal and IND administrated groups.
| Groups | Normal Control | Intoxicated Control | Treated with RRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 5 ml/kg | 10 ml/kg | 15 ml/kg | ||
| HB(g/dl) | 14.41 ± 1.99a | 10.53 ± 1.47b * | 12.97 ± 1.41a | 13.09 ± 1.44a | 13.21 ± 1.33a |
| PCV | 40.11 ± 4.77a | 30.17 ± 3.33b ** | 35.71 ± 3.59a | 34.01 ± 4.17a | 38. 71 ± 4.22a |
| 5.11 ± 0.99a | 2.29 ± 0.82bc* | 4.51 ± 1.01a | 4.31 ± 1.03a | 4.61 ± 1.31a | |
*Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. n = 8 rats/group.
**Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).
RRO: Ribes Rubrum Oil, Hb: hemoglobin, PCV: Packed cell Volume, RBCs: Red Blood Cells.
Gastric tissues cyclooxygenase activity, prostaglandin E2 concentration and cytochrome P450 reductase activity of normal and IND administrated groups.
| Groups | Normal Control | Intoxicated Control | Treated with RRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 5 ml/kg | 10 ml/kg | 15 ml/kg | ||
| Cox-2 ng/mg | 4.56 ± 0.91a | 2.01 ± 0.51c** | 3.81 ± 0.33b | 3.99 ± 0.41b | 4.44 ± 0.28a |
| PGE2 pg/mg | 375.34 ± 55.14a | 147.77 ± 10.14c*** | 371.13 ± 30.11ab | 374.71 ± 31.61a | 379.31 ± 39.11a |
| Cyto P450 ng/mg | 9.45 ± 1.98b | 19.23 ± 3.11a** | 10.32 ± 1.42b | 10.21 ± 1.73b | 9.88 ± 1.66b |
*Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. n = 8 rats/group.
**Values not sharing a common superscript differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).
RRO: Ribes Rubrum Oil, Cox: cyclooxygenase, PG: prostaglandin, Cyto: cytochrome.
Antioxidant activity of ribes rubrum oil.
| Parameters | Scavenging activity of DPPH radicals (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 (µg/ml) | 75.4 ± 1.6 |
| 10 (µg/ml) | 87.7 ± 1.7 |
| 15 (µg/ml) | 97.3 ± 2.2* |
| 20 (µg/ml) | 93.2 ± 1.5 |