| Literature DB >> 35002390 |
Manish Kumar1, Abhishek Tiwari2, Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq3, Anroop B Nair4, Shailendra Bhatt5, Pottathil Shinu6, Abdulaziz K Al Mouslem4, Shery Jacob7, Abdulhakeem S Alamri8,9, Walaa F Alsanie8,9, Majid Alhomrani8,9, Varsha Tiwari2, Sheetal Devi1, Ajay Pathania1, Nagaraja Sreeharsha4,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal activity; Itraconazole; Nano-lipid carriers; Ocular; Release
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002390 PMCID: PMC8717166 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the preparation of itraconazole-loaded NLCs by homogenization method.
32 Factorial design for the itraconazole-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers.
| F1 | 1:1 (-1) | 1 (-1) | |
| F2 | 1:1 (-1) | 3 (1) | |
| F3 | 3:1 (1) | 3 (1) | |
| F4 | 1:1 (-1) | 2 (0) | |
| F5 | 3:1 (1) | 1 (-1) | |
| F6 | 2:1 (0) | 2 (0) | |
| F7 | 2:1 (0) | 1 (-1) | |
| F8 | 3:1 (1) | 2 (0) | |
| F9 | 2:1 (0) | 3 (-1) | |
| F10* | 1.5:0.5 | 1.5 |
Characterization of itraconazole-loaded NLCs (F1-F10).
| F1 | 164.14 | 95.34 ± 1.23 | 34.8 ± 0.13 |
| F2 | 152.21 | 91.43 ± 1.87 | 42.18 ± 0.40 |
| F3 | 160.62 | 60.67 ± 0.67 | 52.45 ± 1.20 |
| F4 | 157.87 | 93.78 ± 1.12 | 61.56 ± 1.09 |
| F5 | 166.67 | 62.17 ± 0.79 | 51.45 ± 0.93 |
| F6 | 150.67 | 94.65 ± 0.98 | 68.67 ± 0.53 |
| F7 | 153.40 | 93.06 ± 0.68 | 48.89 ± 0.23 |
| F8 | 165.96 | 91.54 ± 0.16 | 58.44 ± 0.76 |
| F9 | 175.39 | 90.76 ± 1.71 | 61.23 ± 0.73 |
| F10* | 179.12 | 93.61 ± 0.89 | 46.19 ± 0.67 |
F10*= extra design check point formulation.
Results of the lack of fit test statistical analysis and model summary for mean particle size, entrapment efficiency, and drug release.
| Source of variation | DF | SS | MS | F | P | DF | SS | MS | F | P | DF | SS | MS | F | P | DF |
| Model | 5 | 6467.85 | 1293.57 | 38.20 | 0.0018a | 5 | 1225.49 | 245.10 | 2.50 | 0.0015a | 5 | 764.82 | 152.96 | 0.9484 | 0.0014a | 764.82 |
| A-Lipid Ratio | 1 | 5164.43 | 5164.43 | 152.51 | 0.0002 | 1 | 729.74 | 729.74 | 7.44 | 0.0526 | 1 | 115.98 | 115.98 | 0.7191 | 0.4442 | 115.98 |
| B-Emulsifier | 1 | 0.6734 | 0.6734 | 0.0199 | 0.8947 | 1 | 9.91 | 9.91 | 0.1010 | 0.7665 | 1 | 144.65 | 144.65 | 0.8969 | 0.3972 | 144.65 |
| AB | 1 | 48.16 | 48.16 | 1.42 | 0.2989 | 1 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.0148 | 0.9090 | 1 | 479.61 | 479.61 | 2.97 | 0.1597 | 479.61 |
| A2 | 1 | 1254.58 | 1254.58 | 37.05 | 0.0037 | 1 | 185.65 | 185.65 | 1.89 | 0.2409 | 1 | 16.35 | 16.35 | 0.1014 | 0.7661 | 16.35 |
| B2 | 1 | 34.27 | 34.27 | 1.01 | 0.3714 | 1 | 218.19 | 218.19 | 2.22 | 0.2101 | 1 | 12.27 | 12.27 | 0.0761 | 0.7964 | 12.27 |
DF; degree of freedom, SS; sum of squares, MS; mean of square, F; F-value, P; P-value. aStatistically significant (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2In vitro release profile from different ITZ loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (F1-F10) performed by dialysis method using simulated saliva as dissolution medium.
Fig. 3Response surface plot showing the effect of lipid ratio (X1) and % emulsifier (X2) on particle size, entrapment efficiency, and release.
Fig. 4DSC of (a) Itraconazole, (b) Poloxamer, (c) Blank NLCs; (D) ITZ-NLCs (F6).
Fig. 5Transmission electron microscopy image of optimized itraconazole loaded nanostructured lipid carrier (F6).
Fig. 6Zone of inhibition of optimized itraconazole-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier (ITZ-NLC, F6), blank NLC, and ITZ eye drop (standard).
Scores obtained in the ocular irritancy study by the HET-CAM test.
| 5 | 60 | 240 | 480 | 720 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITZ-loaded NLCs (F6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.36 |
| Negative control (0.9% w/v sodium chloride) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive control (0.1 M sodium hydroxide) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Fig. 7Ocular tolerance test (HET-CAM) of optimized itraconazole loaded nanostructured lipid carrier (F6) at 8 h.