CHA2DS2-VASc, a Simple Clinical Score Expanding Its Boundaries to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Promising results of CHA2DS2-VASc score have been reported for the prediction of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, data of its predictive strength in the context of primary PCI are not available. Therefore, in this study, we have assessed predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score for CI-AKI after primary PCI.
METHODS: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2021 at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan. Inclusion criteria of the study was consecutive adult patients who had undergone primary PCI. Baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated, and either a 25% or 0.5 mg/dL increase in post-procedure serum creatinine level as compared to baseline level was categorized as CI-AKI.
RESULTS: A total of 691 patients were included, of which 82.1% (567) were male. CI-AKI after primary PCI was observed in 63 (9.1%) patients, out of which 66.7% (42) of patients had CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2. The area under the curve (AUC) for the score was 0.725 [0.662 to 0.788] with a sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% [63.1% to 70.2%] and 66.7% [53.7% to 78.1%], respectively, at a cut-off value of ≥2. In multivariable analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 were found to be independent predictors with adjusted odds ratios of 2.19 [1.06-4.5] and 2.13 [1.13-4.01], respectively.
CONCLUSION: CHA2DS2-VASc score has a good predictive value for the prediction of CI-AKI after primary PCI. Criteria of CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 can be used for the risk stratification of CI-AKI after primary PCI.

Introduction

According to current clinical practice guidelines by the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA)1 and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC),2 the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the first line treatment option for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting to a PCI capable center within 12 hours of symptom onset. Adoption of primary PCI strategy has resulted in a significant improvement in outcomes of patients with STEMI,3 however, risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), also called contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), remains high in these patients with the reported incidence rate ranging from 5.5% to 21.6% in various studies depending on the definition used for the categorization of CI-AKI and inclusion criteria.4–20 CI-AKI is found to be associated with an increased risk of need for dialysis and mortality,16 chronic kidney disease (CKD) followed by CI-AKI in these patients, is found to be associated with an increased risk of long term adverse outcomes.21

In recent years, several studies have been performed evaluating various risk stratification tools and biomarkers in the context of CI-AKI after primary PCI which included the Mehran risk score (MRS),7,17 plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP),7,18 gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT),20 thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk index (TRI),8 PRECISE-DAPT risk score,10 Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome (C-ACS) score,11 fragmented QRS complexes (fQRS),12 and a combination of various other tools.13,15 However, search for an optimal risk stratification tool still continues which would be simple enough for clinical adoption yet is accurate enough to rely upon for clinical decision making. The two most recent studies by Chaudhary et al22 and Kurtul et al23 have reported promising results for CHA2DS2-VASC score with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 [95% CI: 0.73–0.90] and 0.769 [95% CI: 0.733–0.805] respectively for prediction of CI-AKI after PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data regarding the predictive strength of this well-known embolic risk stratification modality is not available in the context of primary PCI for STEMI. Additionally, among various available risk stratification models for acute kidney injury (AKI), CHA2DS2-VASC score is more clinician-friendly and easy to adopt, especially in an emergency setting.24 Furthermore, CI-AKI is considered to be largely associated with baseline renal function, however, CHA2DS2-VASC score is independent of baseline kidney function therefore, it can be an effective tool for patients without pre-existing renal conditions.25 However, a recent study by Kumar et al26 reported CHA2DS2-VASc score to have poor discriminating power as compared to the MRS in contrast to the earlier studies in ACS patients. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score for CI-AKI after primary PCI among patients with STEMI presented to a tertiary care cardiac center of Karachi, Pakistan.

Materials and Methods

This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2021 at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan. The study protocol was approved by the ethical review committee (ERC) of the NICVD, Karachi (ERC-56/2021). As per the Declaration of Helsinki the purpose of the study was explained to all the participants and verbal consent was obtained from all the patients regarding their participation in this study. Due to the observational nature of the study written consent was waived and verbal informed consent was approved by the institutional ERC. Inclusion criteria of the study were consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) of either gender presented with STEMI and who had undergone primary PCI. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at baseline or on hemodialysis, prior myocardial infarction (MI), or in Killip class IV or in cardiogenic shock at presentation were excluded from the study. Additionally patients with contrast medium exposure within 1 week of the procedure were also excluded. The purpose of excluding this particular subset of patients with high risk features was to minimize biasness in the assessment of predictive value due to expected high incidence of complications in this particular group. Secondly, in general patients with high risk features tend to receive more close monitoring in comparison to relatively stable patients, therefore, this particularly stable group of patients may most benefit from a systematic risk assessment for the development of complications.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded on a predefined structured proforma. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics consisted of age, gender, vitals at presentation (heart rate and blood pressure), serum creatinine level on arrival, type of MI, Killip class at presentation, and total ischemic time (the time between onset of symptoms and device activation). All PCI procedures were performed as per the institutional protocols and current clinical practice guidelines1 by the experienced interventional cardiologists. Angiographic and procedural characteristics such as number of diseased vessels, culprit artery, thrombus grade, vessel length and diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume were recorded. Pre and post procedure pharmacological and non-pharmacological management was the same for all the patients.

Diagnosis of STEMI was made based on history and presenting electrocardiography (ECG) as per the 4th universal definition of MI. The CHA2DS2-VASc risk score was calculated for all the patients at the time of presentation based on scoring schema proposed by Lip et al.27 A score of 1 for each of the parameters namely history of heart failure (C), hypertension (H), diabetes (D), vascular disease (V), female, and age 65–74 years of age and a score of 2 for each of the parameters namely of history of stroke (S2) and age equal to or higher than 75 years. MRS was also computed in accordance with the criteria defined by Mehran et al.28

Serum creatinine level after 48 to 72 hours of primary PCI were noted and CI-AKI was defined as either a 25% or 0.5 mg/dL increase in post-procedure serum creatinine level at 48 to 72 hours as compared to the baseline level.29 Even though several other definitions are available, such as KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria, to define acute kidney injury but in this study we have adopted the most commonly used definition of CI-AKI in the context of percutaneous coronary interventions.29 Along with CI-AKI various other post-procedure in-hospital complications were recorded which included slow flow/no-reflow (defined as 0-II intra-procedure TIMI flow), arrhythmias (needing pharmacotherapy), access site complications, bleeding (needing transfusion), cardiogenic shock, dissection, stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), and reinfarction (stent thrombosis).

Data analysis was performed with the help of IBM SPSS version 21. Collected data were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequency and percentage appropriately. Normality of distribution was tested with a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and visual assessment of histogram. Variables with potentially skewed distribution were expressed as median [interquartile range (IQR)]. The ROC curve analysis was performed and AUC [95% confidence interval (CI)] was computed for both CHA2DS2-VASc score and MRS. The optimal cutoff value of CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict CI-AKI was determined by using the Youden Index (J statistic) and accuracy measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy along with 95% confidence intervals were computed. Patients were categorized based on CI-AKI and clinical and demographic characteristics were compared by applying appropriate chi-square test or Fisher exact test and independent sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses for CI-AKI was performed and odds ratios (OR) [95% CI] were computed. Significant clinical and demographic characteristics which were not used for the calculation of CHA2DS2-VASc score were taken as independent variables in the multivariable logistic regression analysis along with CHA2DS2-VASc score. A P value ≤ 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant throughout the analysis.

Results

A total of 691 patients were included, out of which 82.1% (567) were male and the mean age of the study sample was 52.26 ± 10.96 years. Contrast-induced nephropathy was observed in 63 (9.1%) patients which was found to be associated with older age with 34.9% (22) vs 14.3% (90); p<0.001 patients ≥65 years of age in the CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI group respectively. Patients in CI-AKI group, as compared to non-CI-AKI group, were found to have higher total ischemic time (350 [260-500] minutes vs 320 [220-420] minutes; p = 0.033), increased heart rate (88.1 ± 23.3 bpm vs 82.7 ± 18.1 bpm; p = 0.030), high random blood sugar at presentation (163 [130-230] mg/dL vs 140 [121–179.5] mg/dL; p = 0.003), high Killip class III (12.7% (8) vs 3.3% (21); p < 0.001), and arrhythmias on presentation (15.9% (10) vs 6.7% (42); p = 0.008).

Similarly, pre-existing co-morbid conditions were also higher among the CI-AKI group, as compared to the non-CI-AKI group, such as hypertension (60.3% (38) vs 44.1% (277); p = 0.014), diabetes mellitus (46% (29) vs 24% (151); p < 0.001), cerebrovascular accident (4.8% (3) vs 0.8% (5); p = 0.005), congestive heart failure (63.5% (40) vs 32% (201); p < 0.001). High left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (20.3 ± 6.9 mmHg vs 16.6 ± 4.9 mmHg; p < 0.001) and low left ventricular ejection fraction (37.4 ± 9.6% vs 42.4 ± 8.4%; p < 0.001) were also observed in the CI-AKI group as compared to the non-CI-AKI group. Rate of placement of intra-aortic balloon pump was high in the CIN group with a rate of 6.3% (4) vs 0.6% (4); p < 0.001 for the CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI groups respectively. The finding of multi-vessel disease was more common in the CIN group as compared to the non-CI-AKI group with frequency of 31.7% (20) vs 18.2% (114); p = 0.009 respectively.

Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was significantly higher among the CI-AKI group as compared to the non-CI-AKI group with mean scores of 2.22 ± 1.34 vs 1.16 ± 1.17; p < 0.001, and frequency of patient with score of ≥2 was also significantly higher among the CI-AKI group, 66.7% (42) vs 33.3% (209); p < 0.001, as compared to the non-CI-AKI group respectively.

In-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with CI-AKI with a mortality rate of 6.3% (4) vs 1.4% (9); p = 0.006 as compared to the non-CI-AKI group respectively. Similarly, post-procedure complications such as slow flow/no-reflow (41.3% (26) vs 15.9% (100); p < 0.001), arrhythmias needing pharmacotherapy (9.5% (6) vs 1.1% (7); p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (4.8% (3) vs 0.8% (5); p = 0.005), stroke (1.6% (1) vs 0% (0); p = 0.002), and reinfarction (3.2% (2) vs 0.3% (2); p = 0.004) were significantly higher among the CI-AKI group as compared to the non-CI-AKI group respectively (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic, Clinical, and Procedural Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcome of Patients Stratified by Development of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

Characteristics	Total	Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury		P-value
		No	Yes
N	691	628 (90.9%)	63 (9.1%)	-
Gender
Male	82.1% (567)	82.3% (517)	79.4% (50)	0.559
Female	17.9% (124)	17.7% (111)	20.6% (13)
Age (years)	52.26 ± 10.96	51.51 ± 10.78	59.78 ± 9.85	<0.001*
<65 years	83.8% (579)	85.7% (538)	65.1% (41)	<0.001*
65 to 75 years	14% (97)	12.6% (79)	28.6% (18)	<0.001*
>75 years	2.2% (15)	1.8% (11)	6.3% (4)	0.017*
Body mass index	26.6 ± 3.2	26.6 ± 3.2	26.3 ± 3.6	0.377
Total ischemic time (minutes)	320 [225–430]	320 [220–420]	350 [260–500]	0.033*
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)	131 ± 23.1	131.2 ± 22.7	128.4 ± 26.2	0.350
Heart rate (bpm)	83.2 ± 18.7	82.7 ± 18.1	88.1 ± 23.3	0.03*
Random blood sugar (mg/dL)	140 [124–186]	140 [121–179.5]	163 [130–230]	0.002*
Creatinine on arrival (mg/dL)	0.9 ± 0.2	0.9 ± 0.2	1.1 ± 0.3	<0.001*
Killip Class
I	86.4% (597)	89.2% (560)	58.7% (37)	<0.001*
II	9.4% (65)	7.5% (47)	28.6% (18)	<0.001*
III	4.2% (29)	3.3% (21)	12.7% (8)	<0.001*
IV	0% (0)	0% (0)	0% (0)	-
Type of myocardial infarction (MI)
Anterior	52.8% (365)	52.2% (328)	58.7% (37)	0.324
Non-Anterior	47.2% (326)	47.8% (300)	41.3% (26)
Intubated	6.8% (47)	5.6% (35)	19% (12)	<0.001*
Arrhythmia on presentation	7.5% (52)	6.7% (42)	15.9% (10)	0.008*
Co-morbid conditions
Hypertension	45.6% (315)	44.1% (277)	60.3% (38)	0.014*
Smoking	34.6% (239)	36.1% (227)	19% (12)	0.007*
Diabetes mellitus	26% (180)	24% (151)	46% (29)	<0.001*
Cerebrovascular accident	1.2% (8)	0.8% (5)	4.8% (3)	0.005*
Congestive heart failure	34.9% (241)	32% (201)	63.5% (40)	<0.001*
Peripheral vascular disease	0.6% (4)	0.5% (3)	1.6% (1)	0.268
Access for procedure
Radial	78.7% (544)	80.7% (507)	58.7% (37)	<0.001*
Femoral	21.3% (147)	19.3% (121)	41.3% (26)
LVEDP (mmHg)	17 ± 5.2	16.6 ± 4.9	20.3 ± 6.9	<0.001*
LVEF (%)	41.9 ± 8.6	42.4 ± 8.4	37.4 ± 9.6	<0.001*
TPM Implanted	5.2% (36)	5.1% (32)	6.3% (4)	0.669
Peri-procedure IABP Used	1.2% (8)	0.6% (4)	6.3% (4)	<0.001*
Number of diseased vessels
Single vessel disease	44.7% (309)	46.7% (293)	25.4% (16)	0.001*
Two vessel disease	35.9% (248)	35.2% (221)	42.9% (27)	0.227
Three vessel disease	19.4% (134)	18.2% (114)	31.7% (20)	0.009*
Culprit artery
Left main	0.7% (5)	0.6% (4)	1.6% (1)	0.396
Proximal LAD	33.1% (229)	32.8% (206)	36.5% (23)	0.551
Non-Proximal LAD	19.7% (136)	19.6% (123)	20.6% (13)	0.842
Left circumflex	12% (83)	11.6% (73)	15.9% (10)	0.323
Right coronary artery	33.4% (231)	34.2% (215)	25.4% (16)	0.156
Diagonal	0.9% (6)	1% (6)	0% (0)	0.436
Ramus	0.1% (1)	0.2% (1)	0% (0)	0.751
Thrombus Grade (TG)
Low TG (≤3)	55% (380)	53.3% (335)	71.4% (45)	0.006*
High TG (≥4)	45% (311)	46.7% (293)	28.6% (18)
Vessel diameter (mm)	3.5 ± 0.4	3.5 ± 0.4	3.5 ± 0.3	0.919
Lesion length (cm)	26.6 ± 11.1	26.4 ± 10.8	28.2 ± 14.2	0.234
Fluoroscopy time (minutes)	14.5 ± 7.8	14.4 ± 7.8	15.7 ± 7.6	0.202
Contrast volume (ml)	118.8 ± 35.8	118 ± 34.9	126.3 ± 43.1	0.080
Mehran Risk Score	4.61 ± 3.31	4.32 ± 3.1	7.53 ± 3.85	<0.001*
CHA2DS2-VASc score	1.26 ± 1.23	1.16 ± 1.17	2.22 ± 1.34	<0.001*
<2	63.7% (440)	66.7% (419)	33.3% (21)	<0.001*
≥2	36.3% (251)	33.3% (209)	66.7% (42)
In-hospital complications
Slow flow/ no-reflow	18.2% (126)	15.9% (100)	41.3% (26)	<0.001*
Arrhythmia needing pharmacotherapy	1.9% (13)	1.1% (7)	9.5% (6)	<0.001*
Access site complications	0.6% (4)	0.6% (4)	0% (0)	0.525
Bleeding	0.6% (4)	0.5% (3)	1.6% (1)	0.268
Cardiogenic Shock	1.2% (8)	0.8% (5)	4.8% (3)	0.005*
Dissection	1.2% (8)	1.1% (7)	1.6% (1)	0.738
Stroke	0.1% (1)	0% (0)	1.6% (1)	0.002*
Re-infarction	0.6% (4)	0.3% (2)	3.2% (2)	0.004*
In-hospital mortality	1.9% (13)	1.4% (9)	6.3% (4)	0.006*

Note: *Significant at 5%.

Abbreviations: LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; TPM, temporary pacemaker; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; LAD, left atrial descending artery.

The AUC of CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting CI-AKI after primary PCI was 0.725 [0.662 to 0.788] (Figure 1) and the optimal cutoff value was ≥2 with sensitivity of 66.7% [63.1% to 70.2%] and specificity of 66.7% [53.7% to 78.1%]. The rate of CI-AKI was 16.7% (42/251) vs 4.8% (21/440); p < 0.001 for patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2 and <2 respectively. The AUC for the Mehran score was found to be 0.745 [0.679 to 0.810]. Accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for prediction of CI-AKI after primary PCI is presented in Table 2.

Figure 1

ROC curve analysis of Mehran risk score (A) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (B) for prediction of contrast-induced acute kidney injury after primary PCI procedure.

Table 2

Accuracy of CHA2DS2-VASc Score for Prediction of Contrast-Inducted Acute Kidney Injury

Characteristics	Total	CHA2DS2-VASc Score		p-value
		< 2	≥ 2
N	691	440	251	-
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury (CI-AKI)
No	90.9% (628)	95.2% (419)	83.3% (209)	<0.001*
Yes	9.1% (63)	4.8% (21)	16.7% (42)
Diagnostic accuracy for assessment for contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Accuracy	66.7% [95% CI; 63.1% to 70.2%]
Sensitivity	66.7% [95% CI; 53.7% to 78.1%]
Specificity	66.7% [95% CI; 62.9% to 70.4%]
Positive Predictive Value	16.7% [95% CI; 14.1% to 19.8%]
Negative Predictive Value	95.2% [95% CI; 93.3% to 96.6%]

Note: *Significant at 5%.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the predictors of CI-AKI after a primary PCI procedure are presented in Table 3. Among the various characteristics, left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤30% and CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2 were found to be significantly independent predictors of post primary PCI CI-AKI development with adjusted OR of 2.19 [1.06–4.5] and 2.13 [1.13–4.01] respectively.

Table 3

Predictors of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Primary PCI Procedure

Factors	Univariate		Multivariable
	OR [95% CI]	P-value	OR [95% CI]	P-value
TIT ≥ 6 hours	1.45 [0.86–2.43]	0.164	-	-
HR ≥ 100	2.42 [1.39–4.22]	0.002*	1.38 [0.7–2.74]	0.355
RBS ≥ 200	2.47 [1.44–4.24]	0.001*	1.8 [0.98–3.32]	0.060
Intubated	3.99 [1.95–8.15]	<0.001*	0.73 [0.28–1.95]	0.533
Arrhythmias on presentation	2.63 [1.25–5.54]	0.011*	1.73 [0.72–4.16]	0.221
Femoral access	2.94 [1.72–5.05]	<0.001*	1.36 [0.68–2.69]	0.383
LVEDP ≥ 20 mmHg	3.03 [1.79–5.13]	<0.001*	1.77 [0.95–3.32]	0.073
LVEF ≤ 30%	4.24 [2.41–7.47]	<0.001*	2.19 [1.06–4.5]	0.034*
IABP	10.58 [2.58–43.38]	0.001*	3.05 [0.61–15.12]	0.173
Three vessel disease	2.1 [1.19–3.7]	0.011*	1.77 [0.96–3.29]	0.069
High thrombus grade (≥ 4)	0.46 [0.26–0.81]	0.007*	0.6 [0.33–1.11]	0.103
Contrast volume (mL)	1.01 [1.0–1.01]	0.083	-	-
CHA2DS2-VASc Score ≥ 2	4.01 [2.31–6.95]	<0.001*	2.13 [1.13–4.01]	0.019*

Note: *Significant at 5%.

Abbreviations: TIT, total ischemic time; HR, heart rate; RBS, random blood sugar; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

CHA2DS2-VASc score is a simple clinical risk assessment tool initially used for risk stratification of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. Now it is expanding its boundaries as a potential risk stratification model for CI-AKI. It is a simple and clinician-friendly scoring system with all the needed parameters readily available, especially in the context of primary PCI. Although patients with high risk features, such as cardiogenic shock or baseline impaired renal function, tend to receive much closer monitoring for peri-procedure complications, including CI-AKI. However, patients without conventional high risk CI-AKI features can most benefit from the CHA2DS2-VASc score based risk stratification before primary PCI. In our study a score value of ≥2 proved to be a good predictor of CI-AKI after primary PCI. This is the first study of its type in the Pakistani population, especially in a primary PCI setting. In this study we have observed significant association between CI-AKI after primary PCI and most of the parameters of CHA2DS2-VASc score namely age, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular accident. Hence, overall predictive power of CHA2DS2-VASc score was good and it was found to be an independent predictor of CI-AKI after primary PCI along with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤30%). However, reported AUCs of the score in PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are higher than the one we observed for primary PCI, 0.81 [0.73–0.90]22 and 0.769 [0.733–0.805].23

Among studies with AUC less than or close to the AUC observed for CHA2DS2-VASc score, a study conducted by Araujo et al5 reported a simple risk stratification model namely ACEF-MDRD based on age, glomerular filtration, and ejection fraction and tested against the reported Mehran score AUC of 0.733 [0.68 to 0.78] and 0.649 [0.59 to 0.70] respectively. Oksuz et al20 evaluated the accuracy of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) for risk of CI-AKI after primary PCI in 473 patients and reported an AUC of 0.679. Similarly, the predictive value of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk index (TRI) was assessed by Kaya et al8 and the AUC was observed to be 0.740 [0.711 to 0.768].

Various other parameters have shown more promising results such as addition of elevated NT-proBNP to the Mehran score was reported to have an AUC of 0.833 vs 0.793 as against standard defined Mehran.7 N-terminal fragment of pro B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) alone was reported to also be a good predictor of CI-AKI with an AUC 0.74[0.70 to 0.78].18 PRECISE-DAPT score has also been found to be an independent predictor of CI-AKI with an AUC of 0.834 [0.812 to 0.854] and PRECISE-DAPT score of ≥21 has been reported to have 81.3% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity in categorizing CIN.10 The Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome (C-ACS) score was compared with Mehran for its predictive value for discrimination CI-AKI and an AUC of 0.822 vs 0.751 was reported.11 The fragmented QRS complex (fQRS) on a 12-lead electrocardiography has been shown to have an AUC of 0.779 while it is 0.794 for the total number of fQRS ≥3 leads.12 In a study by Koowattanatianchai et al17 a reported three variable model comprising of ejection fraction <40%, presence of three vessel diseases, and use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) reported an AUC of 0.83 [0.76 to 0.90] vs 0.78 [0.69 to 0.87] as compared to the Mehran score.

However, the parameter structure of the CHA2DS2-VASc score is simple and easier for physicians to memorize. The simplicity of the score makes it an attractive choice for the risk stratification of patients at a high risk of developing CI-AKI as compared to the score with a complex formulation or that requiring laboratory assessment and complex ECG interpretations. Pre-procedural clinical risk stratification with such simple tools warns the physician about the potential risk of CI-AKI so that they become over-conscious in intra and post-procedure handling and management of the patient. Additional research is warranted for the calibration of the parameter structures of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in the context of CI-AKI prediction.

To the best of our knowledge this is the first study on the evolution of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for the prediction of CI-AKI in the context of primary PCI. However, some limitations of the study include the single center coverage of the study with a relatively small sample size, along with the exclusion of patients with high risk features, such as preexisting CKD or cardiogenic shock, and CI-AKI was categorized only based on raised creatinine level from baseline and no imaging devices such as IVUS or OCT were used due to the limitation of time and resources. More accurate and direct measures of renal function such as proteinuria and kidney morphology would have improved the accuracy of prediction. Finally, due to the limited number of events in the sample the statistical associations can have low power and further large scale studies are warranted to establish various predictors of CI-AKI.

Conclusion

In conclusion, CHA2DS2-VASc score has good predictive value for discriminating patients at high risk of CI-AKI after primary PCI. The criteria of CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 can be used for the risk stratification of CI-AKI after primary PCI. However, further studies are needed to assess the predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score against other reported risk assessment tools and markers such as the PRECISE-DAPT risk score, NT-proBNP, and fragmented QRS complexes.