Literature DB >> 35002283

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP): Neuroinflammation Biomarker in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Lisda Amalia1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Blockage of the cerebral arteries due to thrombosis and embolism resulting in decreased blood flow to the brain, reduced oxygen supply to the brain, resulting in neuronal damage and causes astrocyte cells to secrete glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between GFAP levels serum and clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
METHODS: This was observational with a cross-sectional design on acute ischemic stroke patients confirmed by CT scans and divided into large vessel occlusion and small-vessel occlusion. Clinical outcome was measured using the National Institutional Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) tool. Statistical analysis uses Spearman's rank correlation test and Mann Whitney's test, significant if p < 0.05.
RESULTS: After collecting 33 research subjects, we found 16 people with large vessel occlusion and 17 people with small vessel occlusion. Serum GFAP levels were 0.2-1.9 ng/mL, 9.1% with a mild neurological deficit, 45.45% were moderate neurological deficits, and 45.45% were severe neurological deficits. There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.522; p = 0.002) between serum GFAP levels and the degree of neurological deficit in ischemic stroke patients. There was a statistically significant difference between serum GFAP levels in ischemic stroke patients with CT scan results of large artery occlusion compared to small artery occlusion (0.7 vs 0.4ng/mL; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: There was a positive correlation between GFAP level serum and NIHSS score on acute ischemic stroke. The higher the value of GFAP serum level, the higher the value for NIHSS and correlated with stroke severity and the extent of brain damage in ischemic stroke patients.
© 2021 Amalia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GFAP; acute ischemic stroke; clinical outcome; large vessel occlusion; small vessel occlusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 35002283      PMCID: PMC8722682          DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S342097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inflamm Res        ISSN: 1178-7031


Introduction

Stroke is a neurological emergency that arises suddenly and is the 3rd cause of death in the world after heart disease and cancer.1 Ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke, accounting for 87% of all strokes worldwide. Impaired blood-brain barrier permeability causes GFAP to diffuse into the cerebrospinal fluid and then enter the blood circulation to detect GFAP levels in the blood. GFAP levels can begin to be detected in the blood after 12 hours of the onset of ischemic stroke and reach the highest levels after 48 hours of the onset of ischemic stroke.2,3 There is hyperreactivity of astrocytes as a result of glutamate excitotoxicity, which can cause changes in astrocytes, namely astrocytes experience hypertrophy and proliferation which is referred to as the astrogliosis process in acute ischemic stroke. Prolonged astrogliosis in patients with brain ischemia can increase neuronal death and exacerbate brain tissue degeneration. This astrogliosis process is characterized by a rapid and high increase in GFAP levels because damaged astrocytes secrete GFAP. Astrocytes are cells that make up the blood-brain barrier, so if there is damage to the blood-brain barrier, it will cause GFAP levels to increase and enter the bloodstream.4 GFAP level serum can be used to assess neurologic deficits, monitor therapy, and prognosticate ischemic stroke. In ischemic stroke, the greater the damage to neurons and neuroglia, the serum GFAP levels will increase, and there is a relationship between high GFAP levels and the severity of the neurological deficit and the extent of brain damage in ischemic stroke patients. The larger the infarct area, the higher the serum GFAP level and NIHSS score.3 Based on the above framework, this study aims to determine the correlation between serum GFAP levels and clinical outcomes based on the NIHSS score in ischemic stroke patients.

Methods

It was an observational correlative analysis with a cross-sectional design at RSUP. Dr. Hasan Sadikin from June 2015 to November 2015.

Clinical and Imaging Evaluation

The research subjects were patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke confirmed by CT scan who came to the hospital within five days after stroke onset and were grouped into large vessel occlusion and small-vessel occlusion based on clinical symptoms and imaging. We exclude the presence of a history of previous stroke, head trauma, patients with glioblastoma multiforme. The results of the NIHSS criteria assessment are scores, namely a score of <4 indicating a mild neurological deficit, a score of 5–12 indicating a moderate neurological deficit, and a score of >12 indicating a severe neurological deficit.

GFAP Measurement

Examination of serum GFAP levels was on admission using Enzyme Link Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Storage of serum examination material at a temperature of 28°C can be stable for up to 5 days at a temperature of −20°C; it is stable for one month, and at a temperature of −80°C it is stable for six months. Before examining serum GFAP levels, the instrument will calibrate and the serum centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 20 minutes. The serum formed was separated and put into a microtube and then stored at −80°C until a predetermined number of samples was obtained.

Statistics

We use IBM SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) for statistical analysis. This study uses the Spearman rank-test and Mann–Whitney’s test. p value below 0.05 is considered significant, and the r coefficient was calculated to establish the correlation.

Ethical Approval

Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung Human Research Ethics Committee (LB.04.01/A05/EC/222/VI/2015) had approved this study. This study had complied with all relevant ethical regulations (including The Declaration of Helsinki). All patients were informed about the purpose of the study and had obtained written consent.

Results

Table 1 shows that the mean age of the study subjects was 57.14 years, most of which consisted of men (60.61%) from 33 study subjects. In this study, the minimum value for serum GFAP levels was 0.2 ng/mL, and the maximum value was 1.9 ng/mL (reference value in ordinary people is <0.0018 ng/mL). We found 3 study subjects (9.1%) in mild neurological deficit, a moderate degree of neurological deficit in 15 study subjects (45.45%), and severe neurological deficit degree in 15 study subjects (45.45%). The number of research subjects with hypertension was 29 subjects (87.87%), dyslipidemia was 16 subjects (48.48%), diabetes mellitus was eight subjects (24.25%), and smokers were 16 subjects (48.48%).
Table 1

Clinical Characteristic of Research Subjects

CharacteristicMean ± SDMin–Maxn (%)
Age (years old)57.14 ± 18.27
Gender
 Male20 (60.6)
 Female13 (39.4)
GFAP serum (ng/mL)0.2–1.9
NIHSS score4–21
 Mild neurological deficit (<5)3 (9.2)
 Moderate neurological deficit (5–14)15 (45.4)
 Severe neurological deficit (≥15)15 (45.4)
Risk factors
Hypertension
 Yes29 (87.9)
 No4 (12.1)
Dyslipidemia
 Yes16 (48.5)
 No17 (51.5)
Diabetes melitus
 Yes8 (24.3)
 No25 (75.7)
Smoking
 Yes16 (48.5)
 No17 (51.5)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; min–max, minimum–maximum.

Clinical Characteristic of Research Subjects Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; min–max, minimum–maximum. Statistical analysis results between serum GFAP levels and the degree of neurological deficit based on the NIHSS score using the Spearman correlation test (rs) obtained a significant positive correlation with a moderate correlation strength of 0.522 (95% confidence level). Table 2 shows the correlation between serum GFAP levels and the degree of neurologic deficit based on NIHSS scores. Increasing GFAP level serum will increase the NIHSS score, which indicates a more severe neurological deficit, and a decrease will follow vise versa in lower serum GFAP levels which indicate a milder neurological deficit.
Table 2

Correlation Between GFAP Level Serum and NIHSS

Correlation Research Variablersp value
Correlation GFAP level serum and NIHSS score0.5220.002

Note: Significant if p < 0.05.

Abbreviation: rs, Spearman correlation test.

Correlation Between GFAP Level Serum and NIHSS Note: Significant if p < 0.05. Abbreviation: rs, Spearman correlation test. Table 3 shows the difference between serum GFAP levels in ischemic stroke patients with CT scan results of large artery occlusion and small artery occlusion. It shows the tendency that serum GFAP levels are increasing in ischemic stroke patients who have CT scan results with large artery occlusion. Results of statistical tests using the Mann–Whitney Test at a 95% confidence level showed that there was a statistically significant difference between serum GFAP levels of ischemic stroke patients and CT scan results of large artery occlusion compared to small artery occlusion (0.7 vs 0.4ng/mL; p = 0.001).
Table 3

Difference Between GFAP Level Serum in Large Artery Occlusion and Small Artery Occlusion Group

GFAP Level (ng/mL)p value*
MedianMinimum-Maximum
CT scan
 Large artery occlusion (n=16)0.70.5–1.90.001
 Small artery occlusion (n=17)0.40.2–1.0

Note: *Mann Whitney Test (p < 0.05).

Difference Between GFAP Level Serum in Large Artery Occlusion and Small Artery Occlusion Group Note: *Mann Whitney Test (p < 0.05).

Discussion

The subjects analyzed in this study amounted to 33 people with a mean age of 57.14 years. Elderly is one of the non-modifiable risk factors for ischemic stroke. Older adults tended to stroke. Based on the American Heart Association (AHA), the risk of stroke doubles every ten years of 55 years. The mean age of the subjects in this study was 57.14 years, which is by previous studies. This study found that the mean age of stroke patients was 58.8 years. Basic Health Research in 2013 also found that the average age of stroke patients was 59 years.5,6 In this study, male subjects were more (60.61%) than women (39.39%). These results follow statistical data from the American Heart Association (AHA) in 2015, which found that the number of men with ischemic stroke was more than women in the 45–59 year age group. The incidence of stroke in women who do not have menopause is lower because of the influence of the hormone estrogen, which functions to provide protection and prevent the process of atherosclerosis of blood vessels.6 This study found that hypertension was the most common stroke risk factor in research subjects (87.87%). According to the AHA in 2015, 40% of ischemic stroke patients in the 45–64 year group have hypertension. The incidence of hypertension in patients with ischemic stroke in America is lower due to hypertension patients receiving regular treatment, thereby reducing the risk of ischemic stroke in the 40–59 year age group.6 Statistical analysis results regarding the correlation between serum GFAP levels and the degree of neurological deficit based on the NIHSS score in ischemic stroke patients in this study (data available in ) obtained a significant positive correlation with moderate correlation strength (rs = 0.522; p = 0.002). The results of previous studies also found a positive correlation with moderate strength between serum GFAP levels and the degree of neurological deficit based on the NIHSS score in ischemic stroke patients (rs = 0.486; p = 0.0001). It shows that increasing GFAP levels are associated with the severity of the neurological deficit that occurs, or in other words, a high serum GFAP level associates with an increasingly severe NIHSS score. It is appropriate that high serum GFAP levels can be a marker of poor neurological outcomes in ischemic stroke patients.3 Biological markers in ischemic stroke that can determine brain damage at the onset of brain ischemia are IL-10, IL-6, TNFα, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and soluble CD40 ligand as markers of inflammation; glutamate (Glu) and aspartate as markers of the occurrence of excitotoxicity processes in stroke; neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as a marker of neuronal damage; protein S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as markers of glial cell damage; and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and cellular fibronectin as markers of blood-brain barrier damage. Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) is a marker that can help establish the diagnosis of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke and for stroke prognosis.7,8 Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) is a cytoskeletal protein, the main filament in mature astrocytes in the central nervous system (CNS), with a filament length of 8–9 nm. The GFAP protein gene locates on the long arm of chromosome 17q21. GFAP expresses as a non-soluble monomeric protein consisting of 432 amino acids with a 49.8–53 kiloDalton (kDa) molecular weight in normal astrocytes. GFAP is produced only by astrocytes, so this protein is found explicitly in the brain.9 Astrogliosis is a molecular, cellular, and functional change in astrocytes that responds to injury to the central nervous system. Astrocytes are the first cells to maintain hemostasis and respond when an ischemic process occurs in the brain. Condition in which the brain or part of the brain does not get enough oxygen and nutrients, resulting in brain cell dysfunction and death. Reduced cerebral blood flow in cerebral ischemia can cause impaired astrocyte ion pump function and disrupt homeostasis, characterized by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and extracellular K+. Astrocytes hypertrophy and proliferate several hours after brain injury due to structural displacement and macrophages in ischemic areas. Activated astrocytes secrete a large number of molecules that benefit ischemic nerve cells by regulating various biological processes. Ischemic conditions can trigger astrogliosis. Astrocyte activation occurs in all cases of CNS damage, regardless of the brain region involved or the type of brain cell damaged.8 Astrogliosis plays a role in repair immediately after brain injury; an example of the trophic function of activated astrocytes is an increase in neurotrophic factors, such as glial cell-derived neurotrophic factors (GDNF).9 In GFAP-GDNF transgenic mice, there was an increase in GDNF in astrocytes and the number of specific motor neurons by reducing brain cell death during ischemia. Astrocytes also play an essential role in regulating extracellular glutamate by limiting the excitotoxicity of glutamate to neurons and other brain cells so that if excessive astrocytes are reactive, they can exacerbate brain nerve cell damage. Excessive reactive astrocytes after CNS injury in mice can increase neuronal death and exacerbate brain tissue degeneration.10−12 Astrogliosis is an increase in intermediate filaments accompanied by hypertrophy and an increase in the number of astrocytes. Reactive astrogliosis will increase the expression of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and the release of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, namely tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL), interferon (IFN), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP). Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein is the essential intermediate filament in mature astrocytes and plays an essential role in the integrity of the astrocyte cytoskeleton. Reactive astrocytes also produce urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), which aid in forming plasmin from plasminogen. Increased calcium in the cell cytoplasm activates the neural enzyme nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), thereby increasing the production of nitric oxide (NO), which causes oxidative stress. The binding nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) to the DNA promoter site cause reactive astrogliosis.20 Excessive reactive astrocytes can produce pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic cytokines that are harmful to neurons or oligodendrocytes in the injured brain, which in turn can cause more severe brain damage.7 Increasing GFAP levels during astrogliosis has been shown in several studies. GFAP is a sensitive marker of astrogliosis and increases immediately after CNS injury.13 The role of reactive astrogliosis in the development of cerebral ischemic lesions is not known for sure, but this study shows that neurons and the occurrence of astrocyte malfunction in ischemic processes can cause neuronal degeneration.14 Disruption of astrocytes in stroke is associated with loss of the body’s defense function to increase the expansion of the inflammatory process and infarct volume.15 Prolonged astrogliosis can be dangerous because it can limit the regeneration of axons, thereby slowing the functional repair of the brain and secreting large amounts of neurotoxic compounds, which can give a poor prognosis in ischemic stroke.16 Prolonged astrocyte activation will adversely affect axon growth. Hypertrophied astrocytes will cause the accumulation of extracellular matrix at the site of injury, which consists mainly of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans.17 The buildup of the extracellular matrix causes the formation of dense structures that can inhibit axon regeneration and form scar tissue. There was an increase in axon regeneration in GFAP and vimentin-deficient mice so that if the astrogliosis process was limited, it could improve axon regeneration after nerve injury.14 Elevated levels of GFAP in ischemic stroke are found in cerebrospinal fluid and serum.3,4 The GFAP polymer will disintegrate to form soluble fragments with a molecular weight of 41 kDa released into the surrounding interstitial fluid.16 GFAP enters the bloodstream from the cerebrospinal fluid by increasing the difference in cerebrospinal fluid and blood concentrations. Damage to the blood-brain barrier in ischemic stroke due to brain tissue death occurs slowly, whereas, in hemorrhagic stroke, the blood-brain barrier damage rapidly so that large amounts of GFAP will enter the circulation.2,18,19 Several studies have shown that GFAP levels can be used as a biological marker to help establish the diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke. Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein levels can find in CSF, serum, and plasma. GFAP levels in the serum of ischemic stroke patients increase within 8 hours after stroke onset and reach maximum levels between days 2 and 5.19 GFAP levels can detect in serum within a few hours after the onset of hemorrhagic stroke, but in ischemic stroke, GFAP levels are detectable in serum for a longer time. In a hemorrhagic stroke, there is a sudden breakdown of the blood-brain barrier with early brain damage. The structural integrity of brain cells and the brain barrier can last longer, so that brain cell death due to necrotic and lysis only appears 6–12 hours after the blockage of the blood vessels in ischemic stroke. GFAP levels in ischemic stroke reach their peak after 48–72 hours after onset.4 Accordingly, the combination of D-dimer and GFAP with stroke scale may provide a simple and highly accurate tool for identifying large vessel occlusion.21 Statistical analysis tests using the Mann Whitney Test at a 95% confidence level showed that there was a statistically significant difference between serum GFAP levels of ischemic stroke patients and CT scan results of large artery occlusion compared to small artery occlusion (0.7 vs 0.4ng/mL; p = 0.001). Patients with ischemic stroke found the mean value of GFAP levels began to increase 6 hours after stroke onset and reached peak values at 48 hours after onset. GFAP levels are strongly correlated with the severity of neurological deficits as measured by the NIHSS score and infarct volume so that GFAP levels can also use as a prognostic marker in ischemic stroke patients. GFAP levels are also associated with the outcome of ischemic stroke patients after three months of stroke.3,4,22

Conclusion

There was a positive correlation between GFAP-level serum and NIHSS score on acute ischemic stroke. The higher the value of GFAP serum level, the higher the value for NIHSS and correlated with stroke severity and the extent of brain damage in ischemic stroke patients.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Astrocytes and brain injury.

Authors:  Yongmei Chen; Raymond A Swanson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a prognostic marker of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  G Liu; J Geng
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Joshua Z Willey; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Astrocyte reactivity and reactive astrogliosis: costs and benefits.

Authors:  Milos Pekny; Marcela Pekna
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Release of glial fibrillary acidic protein is related to the neurovascular status in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  M T Wunderlich; C W Wallesch; M Goertler
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and developing mammalian motoneurons: regulation of programmed cell death among motoneuron subtypes.

Authors:  R W Oppenheim; L J Houenou; A S Parsadanian; D Prevette; W D Snider; L Shen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Protective role of reactive astrocytes in brain ischemia.

Authors:  Lizhen Li; Andrea Lundkvist; Daniel Andersson; Ulrika Wilhelmsson; Nobuo Nagai; Andrea C Pardo; Christina Nodin; Anders Ståhlberg; Karina Aprico; Kerstin Larsson; Takeshi Yabe; Lieve Moons; Andrew Fotheringham; Ioan Davies; Peter Carmeliet; Joan P Schwartz; Marcela Pekna; Mikael Kubista; Fredrik Blomstrand; Nicholas Maragakis; Michael Nilsson; Milos Pekny
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  An ELISA for glial fibrillary acidic protein.

Authors:  A Petzold; G Keir; A J E Green; G Giovannoni; E J Thompson
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Mechanisms of ammonia-induced astrocyte swelling.

Authors:  M D Norenberg; K V Rama Rao; A R Jayakumar
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.655

10.  A Novel Combination of Blood Biomarkers and Clinical Stroke Scales Facilitates Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Strokes.

Authors:  Edoardo Gaude; Barbara Nogueira; Marcos Ladreda Mochales; Sheila Graham; Sarah Smith; Lisa Shaw; Sara Graziadio; Gonzalo Ladreda Mochales; Philip Sloan; Joshua D Bernstock; Shashank Shekhar; Toby I Gropen; Christopher I Price
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Mapping the research trends of astrocytes in stroke: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Zhibin Ding; Nan Jiang; Ting Yang; Hongxia Han; Miaomiao Hou; Gajendra Kumar; Yige Wu; Lijuan Song; Xinyi Li; Cungen Ma; Yanbing Su
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.147

2.  Expression pattern and clinical value of Key RNA methylation modification regulators in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhang; Yuanlin Wang; Beibei Dong; Yi Jiang; Dan Liu; Keliang Xie; Yonghao Yu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Systemic immune responses after ischemic stroke: From the center to the periphery.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Zongchi Liu; Lihui Zhou; Di Ye; Yu Zhu; Kaiyuan Huang; Yuxiang Weng; Xiaoxing Xiong; Renya Zhan; Jian Shen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.786

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.