| Literature DB >> 35002108 |
Gramani Arumugam Vasugi1, Koushik Muthuraja Mathivanan2, Swaminathan Rajendiran1, Sandhya Sundaram1, Irfan I Ayub2.
Abstract
AIMS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Bronchoscope; EBUS-TBNA; ROSE
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002108 PMCID: PMC8670450 DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_60_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cytol ISSN: 0970-9371 Impact factor: 1.000
Demographic characteristics
| Demographic profile | |
| Age | 3 to 78, (median-46) |
| Male | 51% |
| Female | 49% |
Distribution of cases according to clinical diagnosis.
| Clinical Diagnosis | % |
| Granulomatous lesion | 66% |
| Malignancy | 32% |
| Others | 2% |
Diagnosis obtained through EBUS-TBNA
| Diagnosis | Number of cases |
|---|---|
| Non-diagnostic | 3 |
| Cystic lesion | 1 |
| Non-Malignant | |
| Reactive lymphadenitis | 33 |
| Granulomatous lesion | |
| Tuberculosis | 33 |
| Sarcoidosis | 14 |
| Atypical cells | 3 |
| Malignant | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 9 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 3 |
| Others (Metastasis from leiomyosarcoma) | 1 |
Figure 1(a) 18 × 18.3 mm subcarinal station 7 lymph node with central necrosis. (b) Aspirate with epithelioid histiocytes and background showing lymphocytes. (c) 10.5 × 11.3 mm level 4R heterogeneous lymphadenopathy. (d) Aspirate showing clusters of atypical cells with background showing lymphocytes, bronchial epithelial cells, and macrophages. (e) 25.7 × 25.9 mm left interlobar 11 L heterogeneous lymph node. (f) Cellular smears composed of sheets of atypical cells exhibiting marked pleomorphism
Bronchoscopic characteristics and correlation of onsite diagnosis with final histopathological diagnosis
| Diagnosis | ROSE | Final HPE | Lymphnode size (mean) | The average number of passes per patient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granulomatous lesion | 47 | 46 | 18.8-34.1mm | 3.6 |
| Reactive lymphadenitis | 33 | 34 | 19.6-32.3mm | 4.6 |
| Metastatic malignancy | 13 | 13 | 22.5-44.2mm | 2.8 |
| Others (cystic lesion) | 1 | 1 | 75.9mm | 1 |
Statistical analysis of ROSE in EBUS TBNA
| Parameters analyzed | Results |
|---|---|
| Diagnostic yield | 97.7% |
| Sensitivity | 94% |
| Specificity | 100% |
| Positive predictive value | 100% |
| Negative predictive value | 12% |
Comparison of the results of the present study with similar studies
| Diagnostic yield (%) | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | Positive predictive value(%) | Negative predictive value(%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97.2 | 95.08 | 100 | 100 | 93.02 | Ye T |
| 74.5 | 81.7 | 100 | 100 | 22.73 | Madan K |
| 93 | 94 | 100 | 100 | 11 | Herth FJ |
| 91.02 | 89.55 | 100 | 100 | 61.11 | Arun Nair |
| 97.7 | 94 | 100 | 100 | 12 | Present study |