Muhammad Zafar Khan1,2, Afroz Khan3, Dalina Thembisile Mbebe4,5, John Lambert Bruce5,6, Wanda Bekker5,6, Damian Luiz Clarke7,5,6. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa. zaffster@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa. zaffster@gmail.com. 3. Faculty of Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 4. Department of Vascular Surgery, Greys Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. 6. Department of Trauma Surgery, Greys Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Penetrating inferior vena caval injuries remain a challenging operative entity. This study reviews our local experience with the injury over a nine-year period and attempts to contextualize it within the published literature that emanates from South Africa on the topic. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of all patients who underwent a laparotomy for a penetrating IVC injury. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, clinical and biochemical parameters, intraoperative data, ICU admission and outcomes. RESULTS: During the nine-year period, thirty-five patients sustained penetrating injuries to the IVC. Mechanism of injury included 25 low velocity gunshots (71%) and 10 stab wounds (29%). The anatomical location included two (6%) supra-renal, six (17%) juxta-renal and 27 (77%) infra-renal injuries. Venorrhaphy was performed in 22 cases (63%) and ligation in 13 (37%). Average ICU stay was 5.4 days. Thirteen patients died (37%), of which six (46%) died within 24 h of arrival. CONCLUSION: Despite dramatic improvements in surgical trauma care over the last four decades, penetrating injury to the IVC carries a high mortality rate ranging from 31 to 37%. It is unlikely that further improvements can be achieved by refining operative techniques and approaches to resuscitation. Future endeavours must focus on applying the burgeoning understanding of endovascular surgery to these injuries.
BACKGROUND: Penetrating inferior vena caval injuries remain a challenging operative entity. This study reviews our local experience with the injury over a nine-year period and attempts to contextualize it within the published literature that emanates from South Africa on the topic. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of all patients who underwent a laparotomy for a penetrating IVC injury. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, clinical and biochemical parameters, intraoperative data, ICU admission and outcomes. RESULTS: During the nine-year period, thirty-five patients sustained penetrating injuries to the IVC. Mechanism of injury included 25 low velocity gunshots (71%) and 10 stab wounds (29%). The anatomical location included two (6%) supra-renal, six (17%) juxta-renal and 27 (77%) infra-renal injuries. Venorrhaphy was performed in 22 cases (63%) and ligation in 13 (37%). Average ICU stay was 5.4 days. Thirteen patients died (37%), of which six (46%) died within 24 h of arrival. CONCLUSION: Despite dramatic improvements in surgical trauma care over the last four decades, penetrating injury to the IVC carries a high mortality rate ranging from 31 to 37%. It is unlikely that further improvements can be achieved by refining operative techniques and approaches to resuscitation. Future endeavours must focus on applying the burgeoning understanding of endovascular surgery to these injuries.