| Literature DB >> 35000614 |
Sagad Omer Obeid Mohamed1, Esraa Mohammed Ahmed2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tetanus vaccination is an indispensable component of the antenatal care (ANC) and is considered one of the most effective and protective measures against tetanus deaths. However, data on antenatal tetanus vaccination in Sudan are scarce. We aimed to explore the level of antenatal tetanus vaccination and to identify the influencing factors in a nationally representative population sample.Entities:
Keywords: ANC; Antenatal care; Epidemiology; MICS; Tetanus; Vaccine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35000614 PMCID: PMC8744220 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-022-00398-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants
| Variable | Level | Total no. | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age group | 15–19 | 379 | 7.0 |
| 20–24 | 1099 | 20.2 | |
| 25–29 | 1554 | 28.6 | |
| 30–34 | 1154 | 21.2 | |
| 35–39 | 878 | 16.2 | |
| 40–44 | 286 | 5.3 | |
| 45–49 | 83 | 1.5 | |
| Area of residence | Rural | 4001 | 73.7 |
| Urban | 1432 | 26.3 | |
| Wealth index quintile | Poorest | 1199 | 22.1 |
| Second | 1192 | 21.9 | |
| Middle | 1143 | 21.0 | |
| Fourth | 1072 | 19.7 | |
| Richest | 827 | 15.2 | |
| Mother education | None | 2153 | 39.6 |
| Primary | 1958 | 36.0 | |
| Secondary | 919 | 16.9 | |
| Higher | 403 | 7.4 | |
| Armed conflict intensity | High intensity areas | 1962 | 36.1 |
| Low-intensity areas | 3471 | 63.9 | |
| Ever received ANC | Yes | 4395 | 80.9 |
| No | 1038 | 19.1 | |
| Number of ANC visits* | Less than four | 1562 | 35.9 |
| Four or more | 2784 | 64.1 | |
| Place of childbirth | Home delivery | 3889 | 71.6 |
| Health institution delivery | 1544 | 28.4 | |
| Adequate tetanus vaccination | No | 2175 | 40.0 |
| Yes | 3258 | 60.0 |
*Data of 1087 participants were missing
Regression results of adequate tetanus vaccination among the participants
| Variable | Level | Adequate tetanus vaccination | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | COR | AOR * | ||
| Age group | 15–19 | 61.2% | Ref | Ref |
| 20–24 | 64.4% | 1.14 (0.90–1.46) | 1.01 (0.76–1.35) | |
| 25–29 | 62.2% | 1.04 (0.83–1.31) | 0.88 (0.67–1.16) | |
| 30–34 | 59.2% | 0.92 (0.72–1.17) | 0.84 (0.63–1.12) | |
| 35–39 | 53.9% | 0.74 (0.58–0.95) | 0.64 (0.48–0.87) | |
| 40–44 | 52.3% | 0.69 (0.51–0.95) | 0.65 (0.45–0.95) | |
| 45–49 | 54.2% | 0.75 (0.46–1.21) | 1.01 (0.56–1.83) | |
| Area of residence | Rural | 56.5% | Ref | Ref |
| Urban | 69.5% | 1.75 (1.54–1.99) | 1.01 (0.86–1.19) | |
| Wealth index quintile | Poorest | 45.0% | Ref | Ref |
| Second | 56.0% | 1.55 (1.32–1.82) | 1.26 (1.03–1.55) | |
| Middle | 58.7% | 1.74 (1.47–2.04) | 1.31 (1.05–1.63) | |
| Fourth | 69.8% | 2.81 (2.36–3.34) | 1.66 (1.31–2.11) | |
| Richest | 76.3% | 3.91 (3.24–4.76) | 1.89 (1.41–2.54) | |
| Mother education | None | 48.0% | Ref | Ref |
| Primary | 63.5% | 1.89 (1.66–2.14) | 1.31 (1.12–1.54) | |
| Secondary | 72.1% | 2.81 (2.38–3.32) | 1.51 (1.22–1.86) | |
| Higher | 79.0% | 4.08 (3.16–5.27) | 1.70 (1.25–2.32) | |
| Armed conflict intensity | High intensity areas | 56.3% | Ref | Ref |
| Low-intensity areas | 62.0% | 1.27 (1.13–1.42) | 1.34 (1.14–1.57) | |
| Number of ANC visits | Less than four | 60.3% | Ref | Ref |
| Four or more | 72.2% | 1.71 (1.50–1.95) | 1.49 (1.30–1.71) | |
*Variables included into the model for the adjusted odds ratios: age group, mother education, wealth quintile index, ANC visits, area of residence, and the armed conflict intensity