Cormac Kennedy1,2, Osama Ali3, Richard Farnan4, John Stinson3,5, Ahmed Gabr3, Mary Hall3, Patricia O'Connor4,3, Martina Hennessy4,3, Michael Barry4,3. 1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College, Dublin 8, Ireland. kennec30@tcd.ie. 2. St James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. kennec30@tcd.ie. 3. St James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. 4. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College, Dublin 8, Ireland. 5. LEO Pharma, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of hypertension is primarily performed in primary care settings in many health systems. However, two groups of patients often require specialist input: patients with resistant hypertension (RH) and young adults with hypertension. AIMS: To elucidate these groups by examining the characteristics of patients attending an Irish hypertension service, thus informing future management of hypertension. METHODS: Patients were recruited at consecutive hypertension clinics at St James Hospital, Dublin from July to September 2019. Following patient consent, patient data were recorded to identify patient characteristics as well as the results of investigations, blood pressure (BP) measurements and the anti-hypertensive treatment of the study participants which were then analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patients were included in the study. Compared to those without RH, the RH group were more likely to be obese (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.33]), to have cardiovascular disease (OR 3.07 [95% CI 1.56 to 6.02]) and to have a non-dipping BP pattern (OR 3.86 [95% CI 1.57 to 9.47]). Young adults comprised 27% of the cohort. Forty-seven percent of these patients were obese, 15.9% had hypertension in pregnancy and 22.2% had chronic headaches. Despite being prescribed less anti-hypertensives (1.41 vs 2.28; p < 0.05), the majority of young patients had a BP less than 140/90 mmHg, comparing favourably with older patients (OR 2.25 [95% CI 1.20 to 4.27]). CONCLUSION: This contemporary study highlights the high prevalence of obesity among RH patients and young adults with hypertension. Findings suggest that programs to combat hypertension must include interventions to address obesity.
BACKGROUND: The management of hypertension is primarily performed in primary care settings in many health systems. However, two groups of patients often require specialist input: patients with resistant hypertension (RH) and young adults with hypertension. AIMS: To elucidate these groups by examining the characteristics of patients attending an Irish hypertension service, thus informing future management of hypertension. METHODS: Patients were recruited at consecutive hypertension clinics at St James Hospital, Dublin from July to September 2019. Following patient consent, patient data were recorded to identify patient characteristics as well as the results of investigations, blood pressure (BP) measurements and the anti-hypertensive treatment of the study participants which were then analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patients were included in the study. Compared to those without RH, the RH group were more likely to be obese (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.33]), to have cardiovascular disease (OR 3.07 [95% CI 1.56 to 6.02]) and to have a non-dipping BP pattern (OR 3.86 [95% CI 1.57 to 9.47]). Young adults comprised 27% of the cohort. Forty-seven percent of these patients were obese, 15.9% had hypertension in pregnancy and 22.2% had chronic headaches. Despite being prescribed less anti-hypertensives (1.41 vs 2.28; p < 0.05), the majority of young patients had a BP less than 140/90 mmHg, comparing favourably with older patients (OR 2.25 [95% CI 1.20 to 4.27]). CONCLUSION: This contemporary study highlights the high prevalence of obesity among RH patients and young adults with hypertension. Findings suggest that programs to combat hypertension must include interventions to address obesity.
Authors: Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patricia Lloberes; Lourdes Lozano; Gabriel Sampol; Odile Romero; María J Jurado; José Ríos; María D Untoria; José L Tovar Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Holly C Gooding; Shannon McGinty; Tracy K Richmond; Matthew W Gillman; Alison E Field Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Heather M Johnson; Carolyn T Thorpe; Christie M Bartels; Jessica R Schumacher; Mari Palta; Nancy Pandhi; Ann M Sheehy; Maureen A Smith Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 5.128