Literature DB >> 35000035

The double bipolar method for robotic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer.

Hidetoshi Katsuno1, Tsunekazu Hanai2, Tomoyoshi Endo3, Zenichi Morise3, Ichiro Uyama2.   

Abstract

Although meta-analyses and systematic reviews have clarified the benefits of robotic surgery, few studies have focused on robotic rectal surgery (RRS) and the use of Endowrist® instruments. Therefore, we evaluated RRS using the double bipolar method (DBM) and compared its short-term outcomes with those of RRS using the single bipolar method (SBM). This study enrolled 157 consecutive patients and all procedures were performed by the same surgeon and recorded through short video clips. We analyzed the patient demographics and short-term clinical outcomes. Although this observational study has several limitations, the console time for total mesorectal excision using the DBM was significantly shorter than that using the SBM. Although the DBM did not demonstrate a specific learning curve, it was a safe and feasible procedure even for patients with advanced disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the DBM.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35000035     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02418-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  1 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ohtani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Shinya Nomura; Osamu Shinto; Yoko Mizuyama; Hiroji Nakagawa; Hisashi Nagahara; Masatsune Shibutani; Tatsunari Fukuoka; Ryosuke Amano; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.