Isaac Wamala1,2,3, Mossab Y Saeed1, Peter E Hammer1,4, Daniel Bautista-Salinas1, Kimberlee Gauvreau5, Sunil J Ghelani5, Nikolay V Vasilyev1, Pedro J Del Nido1,4. 1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany. 4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We have previously shown in experimental settings that a leaflet foldoplasty device reduces redundant leaflet area to re-establish mitral valve (MV) coaptation. The current study investigates the in vivo device retention and functional durability following foldoplasty. METHODS: The prototype is of superelastic nitinol formed into a 3-dimensional shape. It is unfolded to engage a specified area of leaflet tissue and then folded to exclude this tissue from the coaptation surface. Design modifications were made and tested in benchtop studies to determine the optimal design for durable retention within the leaflet. To evaluate in vivo performance, posterior leaflet chordae were severed in Yorkshire pigs to produce complete posterior leaflet prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation. Design modifications were then used for MV repair. Five animals that underwent repair using the optimal design were observed for 2 weeks postoperative to evaluate the functional result and implant retention. RESULTS: Device position and orientation were maintained at 2 weeks while preserving the functional MV repair in all 5 animals. Coaptation height was 5.5 ± 1.5 mm, which was not significantly different from a baseline of 4.9 ± 0.8 mm. The degree of leaflet excursion was 41.0 ± 16.0 compared to a baseline of 58.7 ± 27.5. CONCLUSIONS: Device foldoplasty is a new concept for MV repair based on the reduction of redundant leaflet tissue area. This study demonstrates the feasibility of safe maintenance of this repair without early dislodgement or embolization.
OBJECTIVES: We have previously shown in experimental settings that a leaflet foldoplasty device reduces redundant leaflet area to re-establish mitral valve (MV) coaptation. The current study investigates the in vivo device retention and functional durability following foldoplasty. METHODS: The prototype is of superelastic nitinol formed into a 3-dimensional shape. It is unfolded to engage a specified area of leaflet tissue and then folded to exclude this tissue from the coaptation surface. Design modifications were made and tested in benchtop studies to determine the optimal design for durable retention within the leaflet. To evaluate in vivo performance, posterior leaflet chordae were severed in Yorkshire pigs to produce complete posterior leaflet prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation. Design modifications were then used for MV repair. Five animals that underwent repair using the optimal design were observed for 2 weeks postoperative to evaluate the functional result and implant retention. RESULTS: Device position and orientation were maintained at 2 weeks while preserving the functional MV repair in all 5 animals. Coaptation height was 5.5 ± 1.5 mm, which was not significantly different from a baseline of 4.9 ± 0.8 mm. The degree of leaflet excursion was 41.0 ± 16.0 compared to a baseline of 58.7 ± 27.5. CONCLUSIONS: Device foldoplasty is a new concept for MV repair based on the reduction of redundant leaflet tissue area. This study demonstrates the feasibility of safe maintenance of this repair without early dislodgement or embolization.
Authors: Robert A Levine; Albert A Hagége; Daniel P Judge; Muralidhar Padala; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Elena Aikawa; Jonathan Beaudoin; Joyce Bischoff; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Patrick Bruneval; Jonathan T Butcher; Alain Carpentier; Miguel Chaput; Adrian H Chester; Catherine Clusel; Francesca N Delling; Harry C Dietz; Christian Dina; Ronen Durst; Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Mark D Handschumacher; Morten O Jensen; Xavier P Jeunemaitre; Hervé Le Marec; Thierry Le Tourneau; Roger R Markwald; Jean Mérot; Emmanuel Messas; David P Milan; Tui Neri; Russell A Norris; David Peal; Maelle Perrocheau; Vincent Probst; Michael Pucéat; Nadia Rosenthal; Jorge Solis; Jean-Jacques Schott; Ehud Schwammenthal; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Jae-Kwan Song; Magdi H Yacoub Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Zhaoming He; Jennifer Ritchie; Jonathan S Grashow; Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Robert A Guyton; Patrick T O'Gara; Carlos E Ruiz; Nikolaos J Skubas; Paul Sorajja; Thoralf M Sundt; James D Thomas Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James S Gammie; Krzysztof Bartus; Andrzej Gackowski; Michael N D'Ambra; Piotr Szymanski; Agata Bilewska; Mariusz Kusmierczyk; Boguslaw Kapelak; Jolanta Rzucidlo-Resil; Neil Moat; Alison Duncan; Rashmi Yadev; Steve Livesey; Paul Diprose; Gino Gerosa; Augusto D'Onofrio; Demetrio Pitterello; Paolo Denti; Giovanni La Canna; Michele De Bonis; Ottavio Alfieri; Judy Hung; Piotr Kolsut Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan; Paolo Berretta; Thierry P Carrel; Martin Andreas; Giuseppe Santarpino; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Thierry Folliguet; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Gianluca Martinelli; Martin Misfeld; Mattia Glauber; Utz Kappert; Malak Shrestha; Alberto Albertini; Kevin Teoh; Emmanuel Villa; Tristan Yan; Marco Solinas Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Chad E Eckert; Brett Zubiate; Mathieu Vergnat; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Michael S Sacks Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2009-07-08 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Yuanjia Zhu; Hanjay Wang; Haley J Lucian; Justin M Farry; John W MacArthur; Michael Ma; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 5.209