| Literature DB >> 34997386 |
Holly L Peay1, Stuart Rennie2, R Jean Cadigan2, Angela Gwaltney3, Thidarat Jupimai4, Nittaya Phanuphak5,6, Eugène Kroon5,6, Donn J Colby6,7,8, Nuchanart Ormsby2, Sinéad C Isaacson2, Sandhya Vasan7,8, Carlo Sacdalan5,6, Peeriya Prueksakaew5,6, Khunthalee Benjapornpong5,6, Jintanat Ananworanich9, Gail E Henderson2.
Abstract
HIV remission trials often require temporary stopping of antiretroviral therapy (ART)-an approach called analytic treatment interruption (ATI). Trial designs resulting in viremia raise risks for participants and sexual partners. We conducted a survey on attitudes about remission trials, comparing ART resumption criteria (lower-risk "time to rebound" and higher-risk "sustained viremia") among participants from an acute HIV cohort in Thailand. Analyses included Wilcoxon-Ranks and multivariate logistic analysis. Most of 408 respondents supported ATI trials, with slightly higher approval of, and willingness to participate in, trials using time to rebound versus sustained viremia criteria. Less than half of respondents anticipated disclosing trial participation to partners and over half indicated uncertainty or unwillingness about whether partners would be willing to use PrEP. Willingness to participate was higher among those who rated higher trial approval, lower anticipated burden, and those expecting to make the decision independently. Our findings support acceptability of ATI trials among most respondents. Participant attitudes and anticipated behaviors, especially related to transmission risk, have implications for future trial design and informed consent.Entities:
Keywords: Analytic treatment interruption; Attitudes; Remission; Transmission; Willingness to participate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34997386 PMCID: PMC9007833 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03504-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165