| Literature DB >> 34996856 |
Stephen J Balevic1,2,3, Daniel Weiner4, Megan E B Clowse3, Amanda M Eudy3, Anil R Maharaj5, Christoph P Hornik6,2, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez6,2, Daniel Gonzalez4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of pregnancy physiology and medication non-adherence on serum hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response in SLE.Entities:
Keywords: antirheumatic agents; pharmacokinetics; systemic lupus erythematosus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34996856 PMCID: PMC8744126 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lupus Sci Med ISSN: 2053-8790
Demographics and clinical characteristics
| All patients | Subgroup for PK model | |
| N (%) or median (IQR) | N (%) or median (IQR) | |
| Age (years) | 31 (27.5–34.3) | 32 (28.9–34.6) |
| Race | ||
| 29 (47.5%) | 9 (40.9%) | |
| 30 (49.2%) | 12 (54.5%) | |
| 2 (3.3%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
| Weight (kg), visit* | 79.4 (66.7–96.3) | 81.1 (65.7–100) |
| Missing weight, visit | 5 (2.5%) | 2 (3.6%) |
| Active LN in last 3 years | 9 (14.8%) | 2 (9.1%) |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL), visit* | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
| Missing serum creatinine, visit* | 24 (11.9%) | 7 (12.7%) |
| Disease activity (PGA) | 0.33 (0–0.75) | 0.25 (0.05–0.67) |
| Disease activity (PGA), visit* | 0.39 (0–0.63) | 0.18 (0–0.62) |
| Prednisone use, visit* | 68 (33.7%) | 14 (25.5%) |
| Prednisone dosage (mg), visit* | 10 (5–20) | 7.5 (5–13.4) |
| Azathioprine use, visit* | 74 (36.6%) | 17 (30.9%) |
| HCQ daily dosage (mg), visit* | ||
| 157 (77.7%) | 41 (74.5%) | |
| 18 (8.9%) | 5 (9.1%) | |
| Other | 27 (13.4%) | 9 (16.4%) |
| HCQ dosing interval (hour), visit* | ||
| 141 (69.8%) | 39 (70.9%) | |
| 61 (30.2%) | 16 (29.1%) | |
*'Visit’ represents the value across all study visits; whereas the data otherwise represent values averaged across all time points for each unique pregnancy. Weight and creatinine represent observed value before imputing missing data.
HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; LN, lupus nephritis; PGA, Physician Global Assessment; PK, pharmacokinetic.
Figure 1Hydroxychloroquine concentration and adherence based on the Medication Adherence Self-Reported Inventory score at each visit.
Predicted HCQ pharmacokinetics throughout pregnancy and post partum*
| Trimester | Half-life (days) | Apparent clearance (L/hour) | Apparent volume of distribution (L) |
| First | 21.4 (16.1) | 42.1 (15.3) | 27 589 (17 248) |
| Second | 24.1 (16.7) | 48.8 (17.6) | 35 935 (19 645) |
| Third | 22.1 (12.7) | 53.0 (18.9) | 36 201 (15 627) |
| Post partum | 32.4 (20.2) | 33.2 (11.8) | 33 164 (16 478) |
*Data presented as mean (SD) of the empirical Bayesian estimates.
HCQ, hydroxychloroquine.
Figure 2Serum HCQ concentrations throughout pregnancy and post partum. Median predicted serum HCQ concentrations throughout pregnancy and post partum, 400 mg/day. Simulations were conducted using the empirical Bayesian estimates from the final pharmacokinetic model and between-subject variability for clearance. HCQ, hydroxychloroquine.
Expected per cent of trough concentrations in pregnancy and post partum with medication non-adherence*
| HCQ cut-off (ng/mL) | 100% adherence | 80% adherence† | 60% adherence† | 40% adherence† | |
| 200 mg/day | 400 mg/day | 400 mg/day | 400 mg/day | 400 mg/day | |
| ≤50 | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 2.2% |
| ≤100 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ≤150 | 27.0% | 2.5% | 7.3% | 22.4% | 57.9% |
| ≤200 | 74.4% | 9.0% | 21.3% | 46.5% | 80.4% |
Values in bold correspond to the optimal HCQ cutoff of = 100 ng/mL.
*Example: patients taking 400 mg/day of HCQ are expected to have a trough HCQ concentration ≤100 ng/mL only 0.3% of the time if fully adherent and 24.2% of the time if taking 40% of doses.
†Corresponds to 20%, 40% and 60% non-adherence, respectively.
HCQ, hydroxychloroquine.