Literature DB >> 34996819

Body Image and Adjustment among Patients with Heart Rhythm Management Devices following Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Mahnaz Rakhshan1, Zeinab Khoshnood2, Leila Ansari2, Amir Aslani3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Heart rhythm management devices save patients' lives. However, they may cause problems with the patient's perspective of their body image. Therefore, given the significance of the heart function and cardiac rehabilitation, this study was conducted to investigate and compare the effect of the cardiac rehabilitation program on adjustment and body image among patients who use heart rhythm management devices.
Methods: This two-group clinical trial was conducted with 100 patients who used various heart rhythm management devices. The patients were randomly assigned into either the control group or intervention group (50 patients in each group) via four triad blocks. The intervention was 16 sessions of the cardiac rehabilitation program and 4 telephone follow-ups over twelve weeks. Data was gathered before the intervention and both eight and twelve weeks after the intervention using the psychosocial adjustment to illness scale and the body image and relationships scale.Findings: The majority of the patients were male and in the age range of 40-60 years. Before the intervention, no statistically significant differences were reported between the groups in terms of adjustment control = 68.13 ± 9.1, intervention = 67.13 ± 4.6) and body image (control = 93.14 ± 8.5, intervention = 91.16 ± 8.4) (P>0.5). However, in the intervention group, with each of three devices (pacemaker, ICD, CRT), significant improvements were observed in all aspects of adjustment (16.7 ± 9.3, 25.3 ± 9.5, 20.6 ± 10.3) and body image (45.50 ± 9.80, 55.10 ± 8.80, 42.90 ± 6.10) over time respectively (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The effectiveness of the cardiac rehabilitation program in improving the body image was reported in this study. Therefore, the cardiac rehabilitation program can have a vital role in improving body image and adjustment among patients who use various cardiac rhythm management devices.
© 2022 Marshfield Clinic Health System.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjustment; Body image; Cardiac rehabilitation; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34996819      PMCID: PMC9390850          DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2021.1530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1539-4182


  23 in total

1.  Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, CRT, CRT-D, psychological difficulties and quality of life.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mario Calvagna; Giuseppe Torrisi; Clea Giuffrida; Salvatore Patanè
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Letter in response to the article entitled "Recommendations for the implantation of leadless pacemakers from the French Working Group on Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology of the French Society of Cardiology" by Defaye et al.

Authors:  Walid Amara; Antoine Milhem; Renaud Fouche; François-Xavier Soto; Mohamed Belhameche; Pascal Sagnol; Antoine Dompnier; Cecile Duplantier-Duchene; Saida Cheggour; Nadir Saoudi
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.340

Review 3.  Anxiety and depression in implanted cardioverter-defibrillator recipients and heart failure: a review.

Authors:  Vicki Freedenberg; Sue A Thomas; Erika Friedmann
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.179

4.  Evaluation of an education and follow-up programme for implantable cardioverter defibrillator-implanted patients.

Authors:  Fatma I Cinar; Nuran Tosun; Sedat Kose
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Follow-up of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: are experts' recommendations implemented in routine clinical practice?

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib; Xiaojuan Mi; Bruce L Wilkoff; Laura G Qualls; Camille Frazier-Mills; Soko Setoguchi; Paul L Hess; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-23

Review 6.  Body image concerns in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A scoping review.

Authors:  Vivi S Frydensberg; Søren J Skovbakke; Susanne S Pedersen; Robin N Kok
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improves outcome for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Findings from the COPE-ICD randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Selina Kikkenborg Berg; Preben U Pedersen; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Per Winkel; Christian Gluud; Birthe D Pedersen; Jesper H Svendsen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  The Challenges of Living With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abbasi; Reza Negarandeh; Reza Norouzadeh; Amir Reza Shojae Mogadam
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 0.611

9.  Evaluation of patients' quality of life aspects after cardiac pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Rubens Tofano de Barros; Sebastião Marcos Ribeiro de Carvalho; Marcos Augusto de Moraes Silva; Juliana Bassalobre Carvalho Borges
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Quality of Life in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juliane Tomzik; Katharina C Koltermann; Markus Zabel; Stefan N Willich; Thomas Reinhold
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11-03
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Cardiac Devices on Patients' Quality of Life-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Willy; Christian Ellermann; Florian Reinke; Benjamin Rath; Julian Wolfes; Lars Eckardt; Florian Doldi; Felix K Wegner; Julia Köbe; Nexhmedin Morina
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.