| Literature DB >> 34995972 |
Stefano Caruso1, Marco Scatizzi2.
Abstract
Radical gastrectomy with an adequate lymphadenectomy is the main procedure which makes it possible to cure patients with resectable gastric cancer. A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis provide phase III evidence that laparoscopic gastrectomy is technically safe and that it yields better short-term outcomes than conventional open gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer. At present, laparoscopic gastrectomy is considered a standard procedure for early-stage gastric cancer, especially in Asian countries. On the other hand, the use of minimally invasive techniques is still controversial for the treatment of more advanced tumours, principally due to existing concerns about its oncological adequacy and capacity to carry out an adequately extended lymphadenectomy. Additional high-quality studies comparing laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer have been recently published, in particular concerning the latest results obtained by laparoscopic approach to advanced gastric cancer. It seems very useful to update the review of literature in light of these new evidences for this subject and draw some considerations.Entities:
Keywords: Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Minimally invasive surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34995972 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Oncol ISSN: 0960-7404 Impact factor: 3.279