Literature DB >> 34995299

Cognitive cascades: How to model (and potentially counter) the spread of fake news.

Nicholas Rabb1, Lenore Cowen1, Jan P de Ruiter1,2, Matthias Scheutz1.   

Abstract

Understanding the spread of false or dangerous beliefs-often called misinformation or disinformation-through a population has never seemed so urgent. Network science researchers have often taken a page from epidemiologists, and modeled the spread of false beliefs as similar to how a disease spreads through a social network. However, absent from those disease-inspired models is an internal model of an individual's set of current beliefs, where cognitive science has increasingly documented how the interaction between mental models and incoming messages seems to be crucially important for their adoption or rejection. Some computational social science modelers analyze agent-based models where individuals do have simulated cognition, but they often lack the strengths of network science, namely in empirically-driven network structures. We introduce a cognitive cascade model that combines a network science belief cascade approach with an internal cognitive model of the individual agents as in opinion diffusion models as a public opinion diffusion (POD) model, adding media institutions as agents which begin opinion cascades. We show that the model, even with a very simplistic belief function to capture cognitive effects cited in disinformation study (dissonance and exposure), adds expressive power over existing cascade models. We conduct an analysis of the cognitive cascade model with our simple cognitive function across various graph topologies and institutional messaging patterns. We argue from our results that population-level aggregate outcomes of the model qualitatively match what has been reported in COVID-related public opinion polls, and that the model dynamics lend insights as to how to address the spread of problematic beliefs. The overall model sets up a framework with which social science misinformation researchers and computational opinion diffusion modelers can join forces to understand, and hopefully learn how to best counter, the spread of disinformation and "alternative facts."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34995299      PMCID: PMC8740964          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  31 in total

Review 1.  The science of belief: A progress report.

Authors:  Nicolas Porot; Eric Mandelbaum
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization.

Authors:  Pranav Dandekar; Ashish Goel; David T Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An agent-based model about the effects of fake news on a norovirus outbreak.

Authors:  J Brainard; P R Hunter; I R Hall
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.019

5.  The MAD Model of Moral Contagion: The Role of Motivation, Attention, and Design in the Spread of Moralized Content Online.

Authors:  William J Brady; M J Crockett; Jay J Van Bavel
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-08

Review 6.  Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.

Authors:  Adam D I Kramer; Jamie E Guillory; Jeffrey T Hancock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Andrea Pereira
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; Jonathon McPhetres; Yunhao Zhang; Jackson G Lu; David G Rand
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-30

10.  Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals' social mobility during COVID-19.

Authors:  J Clinton; J Cohen; J Lapinski; M Trussler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.