Literature DB >> 34995276

A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial.

Giovanni Luigi De Maria1, Luca Testa2, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez3, Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios1, Maria Emfietzoglou1, Roberto Scarsini1, Francesco Bedogni2, Ernest Spitzer4,5, Adrian Banning1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used increasingly for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Observational studies and subgroup analyses from clinical trials, have suggested a possible benefit from the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance when performing unprotected LMCA PCI. However, the value of imaging with IVUS has never been proven in an appropriately powered randomized clinical trial. The OPtimizaTIon of Left MAin PCI With IntravascuLar Ultrasound (OPTIMAL) trial has been designed to establish whether IVUS-guided PCI optimization on LMCA is associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared with standard qualitative angiography-guided PCI.
METHODS: The OPTIMAL trial is a randomized, multicenter, international study designed to enroll a total of 800 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCA disease. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to IVUS-guided PCI versus angiogram-guided PCI. In patients allocated to the angiogram-guided arm, use of IVUS is discouraged, unless there are safety concerns. In patients allocated to the IVUS guidance arm, pre-procedural IVUS assessment is highly recommended, whilst post-procedural IVUS assessment is mandatory to confirm appropriate stenting result and/or to guide stent result optimization, according to predefined criteria. Patients will be followed up to 2 years after the index procedure. The primary outcome measure is the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) which includes all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization at 2 years follow-up. DISCUSSION: The OPTIMAL trial aims to provide definitive evidence about the clinical impact of IVUS-guidance during PCI to an unprotected LMCA. It is anticipated by the investigators, that an IVUS-guided strategy will be associated with less clinical events compared to a strategy guided by angiogram alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04111770. Registered on October 1, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34995276      PMCID: PMC8740965          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  38 in total

1.  Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study.

Authors:  Jose M de la Torre Hernandez; Felipe Hernández Hernandez; Fernando Alfonso; Jose R Rumoroso; Ramon Lopez-Palop; Mario Sadaba; Pilar Carrillo; Juan Rondan; Iñigo Lozano; Juan M Ruiz Nodar; Jose A Baz; Eduard Fernandez Nofrerias; Fernando Pajin; Tamara Garcia Camarero; Hipolito Gutierrez
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Unstable angina. A classification.

Authors:  E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended Follow-Up of the PRECOMBAT Trial.

Authors:  Duk-Woo Park; Jung-Min Ahn; Hanbit Park; Sung-Cheol Yun; Do-Yoon Kang; Pil Hyung Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Do-Sun Lim; Seung-Woon Rha; Gyung-Min Park; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Hyo-Soo Kim; In-Ho Chae; Yangsoo Jang; Myung-Ho Jeong; Seung-Jea Tahk; Ki Bae Seung; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.

Authors:  Daniel J F M Thuijs; A Pieter Kappetein; Patrick W Serruys; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Marie-Claude Morice; Michael J Mack; David R Holmes; Nick Curzen; Piroze Davierwala; Thilo Noack; Milan Milojevic; Keith D Dawkins; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni; Stuart J Head
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Long-term outcomes in the management of left main disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Rafail A Kotronias; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Roberto Scarsini; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-15

6.  Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy.

Authors:  Andrew Ladwiniec; Simon J Walsh; Niels Ramsing Holm; Colm G Hanratty; Timo Mäkikallio; Thomas Kellerth; David Hildick-Smith; Lone J H Mogensen; Juha Hartikainen; Ian B A Menown; Andrejs Erglis; Erlend Eriksen; Mark S Spence; Leif Thuesen; Evald Høj Christiansen
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Venu Jasti; Eugen Ivan; Venkata Yalamanchili; Nattawut Wongpraparut; Massoud A Leesar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Intravascular ultrasound comparison of left main coronary artery disease between white and Asian patients.

Authors:  Reni P Rusinova; Gary S Mintz; So-Yeon Choi; Hiroshi Araki; Diaa Hakim; Elias Sanidas; Tadayuki Yakushiji; Giora Weisz; Roxana Mehran; Theresa Franklin-Bond; Martin Fahy; Martin B Leon; Gregg W Stone; Jeffery W Moses; Seung-Jea Tahk; Masahiko Ochiai; Akiko Maehara
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Luca Testa; Azeem Latib; Mario Bollati; Rocco Antonio Montone; Antonio Colombo; Filippo Crea; Francesco Bedogni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study.

Authors:  Javier Escaned; Carlos Collet; Nicola Ryan; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Simon Walsh; Manel Sabate; Justin Davies; Maciej Lesiak; Raul Moreno; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Stephan P Hoole; Nick Ej West; J J Piek; Azfar Zaman; Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi; Rodney H Stables; Clare Appleby; Nicolas van Mieghem; Robert Jm van Geuns; Neal Uren; Javier Zueco; Pawel Buszman; Andres Iñiguez; Javier Goicolea; David Hildick-Smith; Andrzej Ochala; Dariusz Dudek; Colm Hanratty; Rafael Cavalcante; Arie Pieter Kappetein; David P Taggart; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Marie-Angèle Morel; Ton de Vries; Yoshinobu Onuma; Vasim Farooq; Patrick W Serruys; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.