Giovanni Luigi De Maria1, Luca Testa2, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez3, Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios1, Maria Emfietzoglou1, Roberto Scarsini1, Francesco Bedogni2, Ernest Spitzer4,5, Adrian Banning1. 1. Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2. Coronary Revascularisation Unit, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. 3. Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain. 4. European Cardiovascular Research Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used increasingly for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Observational studies and subgroup analyses from clinical trials, have suggested a possible benefit from the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance when performing unprotected LMCA PCI. However, the value of imaging with IVUS has never been proven in an appropriately powered randomized clinical trial. The OPtimizaTIon of Left MAin PCI With IntravascuLar Ultrasound (OPTIMAL) trial has been designed to establish whether IVUS-guided PCI optimization on LMCA is associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared with standard qualitative angiography-guided PCI. METHODS: The OPTIMAL trial is a randomized, multicenter, international study designed to enroll a total of 800 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCA disease. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to IVUS-guided PCI versus angiogram-guided PCI. In patients allocated to the angiogram-guided arm, use of IVUS is discouraged, unless there are safety concerns. In patients allocated to the IVUS guidance arm, pre-procedural IVUS assessment is highly recommended, whilst post-procedural IVUS assessment is mandatory to confirm appropriate stenting result and/or to guide stent result optimization, according to predefined criteria. Patients will be followed up to 2 years after the index procedure. The primary outcome measure is the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) which includes all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization at 2 years follow-up. DISCUSSION: The OPTIMAL trial aims to provide definitive evidence about the clinical impact of IVUS-guidance during PCI to an unprotected LMCA. It is anticipated by the investigators, that an IVUS-guided strategy will be associated with less clinical events compared to a strategy guided by angiogram alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04111770. Registered on October 1, 2019.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used increasingly for revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Observational studies and subgroup analyses from clinical trials, have suggested a possible benefit from the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance when performing unprotected LMCA PCI. However, the value of imaging with IVUS has never been proven in an appropriately powered randomized clinical trial. The OPtimizaTIon of Left MAin PCI With IntravascuLar Ultrasound (OPTIMAL) trial has been designed to establish whether IVUS-guided PCI optimization on LMCA is associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared with standard qualitative angiography-guided PCI. METHODS: The OPTIMAL trial is a randomized, multicenter, international study designed to enroll a total of 800 patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCA disease. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to IVUS-guided PCI versus angiogram-guided PCI. In patients allocated to the angiogram-guided arm, use of IVUS is discouraged, unless there are safety concerns. In patients allocated to the IVUS guidance arm, pre-procedural IVUS assessment is highly recommended, whilst post-procedural IVUS assessment is mandatory to confirm appropriate stenting result and/or to guide stent result optimization, according to predefined criteria. Patients will be followed up to 2 years after the index procedure. The primary outcome measure is the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) which includes all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization at 2 years follow-up. DISCUSSION: The OPTIMAL trial aims to provide definitive evidence about the clinical impact of IVUS-guidance during PCI to an unprotected LMCA. It is anticipated by the investigators, that an IVUS-guided strategy will be associated with less clinical events compared to a strategy guided by angiogram alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04111770. Registered on October 1, 2019.
Authors: Jose M de la Torre Hernandez; Felipe Hernández Hernandez; Fernando Alfonso; Jose R Rumoroso; Ramon Lopez-Palop; Mario Sadaba; Pilar Carrillo; Juan Rondan; Iñigo Lozano; Juan M Ruiz Nodar; Jose A Baz; Eduard Fernandez Nofrerias; Fernando Pajin; Tamara Garcia Camarero; Hipolito Gutierrez Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel J F M Thuijs; A Pieter Kappetein; Patrick W Serruys; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Marie-Claude Morice; Michael J Mack; David R Holmes; Nick Curzen; Piroze Davierwala; Thilo Noack; Milan Milojevic; Keith D Dawkins; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni; Stuart J Head Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-09-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Rafail A Kotronias; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Roberto Scarsini; Adrian P Banning Journal: Hellenic J Cardiol Date: 2020-04-15
Authors: Andrew Ladwiniec; Simon J Walsh; Niels Ramsing Holm; Colm G Hanratty; Timo Mäkikallio; Thomas Kellerth; David Hildick-Smith; Lone J H Mogensen; Juha Hartikainen; Ian B A Menown; Andrejs Erglis; Erlend Eriksen; Mark S Spence; Leif Thuesen; Evald Høj Christiansen Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Reni P Rusinova; Gary S Mintz; So-Yeon Choi; Hiroshi Araki; Diaa Hakim; Elias Sanidas; Tadayuki Yakushiji; Giora Weisz; Roxana Mehran; Theresa Franklin-Bond; Martin Fahy; Martin B Leon; Gregg W Stone; Jeffery W Moses; Seung-Jea Tahk; Masahiko Ochiai; Akiko Maehara Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Luca Testa; Azeem Latib; Mario Bollati; Rocco Antonio Montone; Antonio Colombo; Filippo Crea; Francesco Bedogni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Javier Escaned; Carlos Collet; Nicola Ryan; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Simon Walsh; Manel Sabate; Justin Davies; Maciej Lesiak; Raul Moreno; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Stephan P Hoole; Nick Ej West; J J Piek; Azfar Zaman; Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi; Rodney H Stables; Clare Appleby; Nicolas van Mieghem; Robert Jm van Geuns; Neal Uren; Javier Zueco; Pawel Buszman; Andres Iñiguez; Javier Goicolea; David Hildick-Smith; Andrzej Ochala; Dariusz Dudek; Colm Hanratty; Rafael Cavalcante; Arie Pieter Kappetein; David P Taggart; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Marie-Angèle Morel; Ton de Vries; Yoshinobu Onuma; Vasim Farooq; Patrick W Serruys; Adrian P Banning Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 29.983