Joshua Taylor1, Lauren Avellone2, Valerie Brooke2, Paul Wehman2, Katherine Inge2, Carol Schall2, Kanako Iwanaga3. 1. College of Education and Human Development, The University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA. 2. Rehabilitation Research & Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, College of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although competitive integrated employment (CIE) has been established as a goal of employment research, policy, and practice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, the secondary benefits of CIE are rarely discussed. AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze and synthesise research related to the association between CIE and improved economic, psychological health, and physical health outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. MATERIALS & METHODS: Our review searched peer-reviewed literature from seven electronic databases and screened 1110 peer-reviewed articles based on inclusion criteria established following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Our search procedures produced a final sample of 17 studies. DISCUSSION: Implications of these findings for future research, policy, and practice are provided. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed strong evidence associated with economic outcomes of CIE, moderate associated with psychological health outcomes, and limited evidence related to physical health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Although competitive integrated employment (CIE) has been established as a goal of employment research, policy, and practice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, the secondary benefits of CIE are rarely discussed. AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze and synthesise research related to the association between CIE and improved economic, psychological health, and physical health outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. MATERIALS & METHODS: Our review searched peer-reviewed literature from seven electronic databases and screened 1110 peer-reviewed articles based on inclusion criteria established following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Our search procedures produced a final sample of 17 studies. DISCUSSION: Implications of these findings for future research, policy, and practice are provided. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed strong evidence associated with economic outcomes of CIE, moderate associated with psychological health outcomes, and limited evidence related to physical health outcomes.