| Literature DB >> 34993345 |
Hanfei Guo1, Lei Qian1, Xiao Chen1, Yuguang Zhao1, Wei Song1, Yanjie Guan1, Jiuwei Cui1.
Abstract
Clinical treatment is challenging for elderly patients with lung cancer who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, do not have cancer driver genes, and have low expression of PD-L1. Since these patients are usually excluded from clinical studies, evidence-based medicine supporting the use of immunotherapy is lacking. Considering the potentially limited clinical benefits and high associated risk of hyperprogressive disease, determining an appropriate treatment is an urgent clinical challenge. We report a 71 year-old male patient diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma lacking key driving genes (EGFR, ALK, and ROS-1), and low expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells (10-15%). The tumor tissue showed a low level of microsatellite instability, low tumor mutational burden, and no DNA mismatch repair deficiency on whole-exome sequencing (WES). However, a high blood tumor mutational burden was detected. After considering the biomarkers of therapeutic effect and ruling out the risk of hyperprogressive disease, pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered every 3 weeks for a year (17 cycles). The disease remained stable for >39 months, and adverse effects were mild and well-tolerated. Therefore, a comprehensive biomarker evaluation, especially in elderly patients lacking driving genes, is essential. Liquid biopsy technology and WES may be useful for overcoming the limitations of tissue biopsy.Entities:
Keywords: hyperprogressive disease; immune checkpoint inhibitors; prognostic marker
Year: 2021 PMID: 34993345 PMCID: PMC8678476 DOI: 10.1515/med-2021-0404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Med (Wars)
Figure 1Imaging of the lung before diagnosis. (a) Consolidation of the lesion in the right upper lobe (May 2017). (b) Significantly damaged seventh thoracic vertebral bone (May 2017).
Summary of the patient’s main tissue and blood specimen analysis results
| Sample type | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary lung lesion | Bone metastases | Blood | |
| IHC staining results | ALK-VentanaD5F3 (−), ALK-Neg (−), BRAF-V600E (−), Her-2 (−), ROS1 (2+), C-MET (2+), EGFR (3+) | Ki-67 (+) (<5%), TTF1 (+), NapsinA (+), EGFR (+) | |
| PD-L1-positive rate | 10% in tumor and 70% in tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells | 15% in tumor and 20% in tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells | |
| Target drug-related gene sequencing | EGFR (−), KRAS (−), NRAS (−), BRAF (−), ALK (−), ROS-1 (−), RET (−) | ||
| MMR gene damage | MSH6 missing copy number: 1.35 | MLH1 (20%), MSH2 (5%), MSH6 (5%) | |
| TMB | 49 mutations/Mb | 408 mutations/Mb | |
| MSI | 0.06% | 0.57% | |
| Copy number variation (CNV) of chromosome | 4.3% | ||
Figure 2(a and b) Baseline CT of the pretreatment primary tumor lesions (July 17, 2017).
Figure 3(a and b) Changes to the major tumor lesions after three courses of treatment (October 9, 2017). While there are no significant changes to the bilateral pulmonary nodules, the mediastinal lymph nodes are slightly smaller and destruction and repair of the rib bones are evident.
Figure 4Variation of ctDNA abundance in the peripheral blood.