Literature DB >> 34993314

The first complete mitogenome of skin beetles Omorgus chinensis (Coleoptera: Trogidae) with the phylogenetic implications.

Hao Yu1, Yong-Jing Chen2, Ying Ying2, Jiao-Jiao Yuan2.   

Abstract

The first complete mitogenome of Trogidae, Omorgus chinensis (Coleoptera: Trogidae) is sequenced using the next generation sequencing. The genomic structure is a circular molecule with 18682 bp in length, comprising 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), 2 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and a control region. The nucleotide composition is A (39.44%), C (13.82%), T (36.78%), and G (9.96%) with an AT content of 76.22%. The phylogenetic analysis of 18 insects in Scarabaeoidae show that Omorgus chinensis shares a close ancestry with Lucanidae and Geotrupidae.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Omorgus chinensis; Trogidae; mitogenome; phylogenomic analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34993314      PMCID: PMC8725881          DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2021.2008823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour        ISSN: 2380-2359            Impact factor:   0.658


Introduction

Omorgus chinensis (Coleoptera: Trogidae) is an important necrophagous insect with an oval shape and tan color. Like most members in Trogidae, this species has a marked engraved and dimpled area on the anterior thoracic plate and a strong arch on the back but a flattened ventral surface (Ren 2003). In recent years, with the development of molecular biology, especially the advancement of next-generation sequencing technology, mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) have been widely used as a typical marker for the phylogenetic study of coleopteran insects (Cameron 2014; Li et al. 2015; Timmermans et al. 2015). Fagua et al. 2018; However, there are only a few molecule phylogenetic researches in Trogidae (Strümpher et al. 2014), and no complete mitogenome data has yet been sequenced. In this study, we sequenced the complete mitogenome of Omorgus chinensis for the first time using the next-generation methods and reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships within other species in Scarabaeoidae, which provides reliable data for subsequent further phylogenetic studies.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

The specimens of O. chinensis were collected by Yongjing Chen and Shiju Zhou (2289788957@qq.com) from Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve, Anhui province, P. R. China, in July 2017. For adult specimens, the muscle tissues were placed in 100% ethanol. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the muscle of a single O. chinensis using the Qiagen DNAeasy Kit. The specimen deposited in the Museum of Anhui university and the sequence was submitted to GenBank with the accession number MK937809.

Polymerase chain reaction amplification, sequencing and assembly

Complete mitogenome was assembled by overlapping high-throughput fragment sequences, the amplification of the three primers were used as markers for tandem high-throughput sequencing fragment sequences. The primers used for amplification listed in Table 1. PCR amplification reactions were carried out in 25 μL volumes containing 10 μM of each primer (forward and reverse) 1 μL, 2 μL template DNA, 12.5 μL 2 × EasyTaq SuperMix (+dye), and 8.5 μL sterile double-distilled water to make up a final volume of 25 μL. The polymerase chain reaction amplifications were performed under the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35–37 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 seconds, annealing at 52–58 °C for 50 seconds, and elongation at 70 °C for 1 min, and then a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. The temperature of annealing was determined by the length of fragments. An Illumina TruSeq library was prepared with an average insert size of 450 bp and was sequenced using the Illumina Hiseq2500 platform with 250 bp paired-end reads. Raw reads were trimmed of adapters using Trimmomatic. Low quality and short reads were removed with Prinseq. High quality reads were used in denovo assembly using IDBA-UD with minimum and maximum k values of 80 and 240 bp, respectively. To investigate the accuracy of the assembly, clean reads were mapped onto the obtained mt contig using Geneious Prime 2019.1.1 (http://www.geneious.com/), allowing for mismatches of up to 2%, maximum gap size of 3 bp and minimum overlap of 100 bp. Finally, we obtained the mitogenome of O. chinensis with the average sequencing depth of 242×.
Table 1.

Details on primers used in this study.

GenePrime nameSequence(5’-3’)LengthReferences
COICOI-F1CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG23 bpSimon et al. (1994)
 COI-R1TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA25 bpSimon et al. (1994)
CytbCytb-F2GAGGAGCAACTGTAATTACTAA22 bpBalke et al. (2004)
 Cytb-R2AAAAGAAARTATCATTCAGGTTGAAT26 bpBalke et al. (2004)
rrnL16S-F1CCGGTTTGAACTCAGATCATG21 bpHosoya et al. (2001)
 16S-R1TAATTTATTGTACCTTGTGTATCAG25 bpHosoya et al. (2001)
Details on primers used in this study.

Mitogenome annotation and analysis

Preliminary annotations made with the MITOS WebServer (Bernt et al. 2013) (http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py). tRNA genes and their secondary structures were inferred using tRNAscan-SE 1.21 (Schattner et al. 2005) (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/). Those not identified by tRNAscan-SE, in addition to 16S ribosomal RNA (rrnL, lrRNA), and 12S ribosomal RNA (rrnS, srRNA), were determined according to sequence similarity with related species. The protein-coding genes (PCGs) were determined by ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html) under the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code. Nucleotide compositions, codon usage, and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values of PCGs were calculated with MEGA-X (Kumar et al. 2018). PCGs were translated with DNAMAN v7.0.2.176 (Lynnon Biosoft, Vaudreuil-Dorion, Canada). Composition skew analysis was conducted according to formulas AT-skew = [A − T]/[A + T] and GC-skew = [G − C]/[G + C] (Perna and Kocher 1995).

Phylogenetic analyses

A total of 18 mitochondrial genomes of Scarabaeoidae were used for phylogenetic analysis (Table 2). Each PCGs was aligned individually based on codon-based multiple alignments using the MEGA-X (Kumar et al. 2018). Models of nucleotide substitution were selected according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) with jModelTest v2.1.4 (Posada 2008). Phylogenetic trees were generated from ML analysis using RAxML (Stamatakis 2014) and Bayesian inference (BI) with MrBayes v3.2.5 (Ronquist et al. 2012), both under the GTR + I + G model. Node support in the ML tree was estimated through bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. The BI was conducted with two simultaneous Markov chain Monte Carlo runs of 2 × 109 generations, sampled every 1,000 steps, with the first 25% discarded as burn-in. Phylogenetic trees were viewed and edited in Figtree v1.4.3 (Kim et al. 2021) (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
Table 2.

Taxa used in this study.

FamilySpeciesGenBank accession number
Aphodiidae Aphodius foetens KX087240
Cetoniidae Protaetia brevitarsis NC023453
Dynastidae Cyphonistes vallatus JX412731
Euchiridae Cheirotonus jansoni NC023246
Geotrupidae Anoplotrupes stercorosus JX412838
Hybosoridae Ceratocanthus sp. JX412772
Lucanidae Cyclommathus vitalisi MF037205
  Dorcus curvidens hopei MF612067
  Lucanus fortunei JX313688
  Lucanus mazama NC013578
  Prismognathus prossi MF614014
  Prosopocoilus confucius KU552119
  Prosopocoilus gracilis KP735805
Melolonthidae Rhopaea magnicornis NC013252
Rutelidae Popillia japonica MG971231
Scarabaeidae Onthophagus yukae KU739463
Sinodendridae Sinodendron yunnanense KP735804
TrogidaeOmorgus chinensis*MK937809

*Mitochondrial genome sequenced in present study.

Taxa used in this study. *Mitochondrial genome sequenced in present study. Mitogenome organization of Omorgus chinensis.

Results and discussion

The mitogenome of O. chinensis is 18,682 bp in length, with the typical gene content as other known Coleoptera mitogenomes: 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes (16S rRNA and 12S rRNA), 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and 1 non-coding AT-rich region (Sheffield et al. 2009; Kim and Farrell 2015; Wu et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2016; Du et al. 2017). The base compositions of the mitogenome nucleotide composition were A (39.44%), C (13.82%), T (36.78%), and G (9.96%) with an AT content of 76.22%. AT-skew and GC-skews were calculated as 0.035 and −0.162. AT-biased were found in the protein-coding region (75.66%), rRNA (80.09%), tRNAs (78.11%) and control region (75.16%). As a typical invertebrate mitogenome, 12 PCGs of the sequence employ same initiation codons ATN, except the start codon of COI is AAT. 10/13 PCGs shared the typical termination codons TAA and TAG, while others use TA residue or a single T as the terminator codons. All of the 22 tRNAs range from 63 to 70 bp in length, 14 of the 22 tRNA-coding genes were located on the J-strand and others were located on the N-strand (Table 3). Secondary structures predicted by the tRNA scan-SE suggested that all the tRNA genes in O. chinensis adopted a typical clover-leaf structurewith the exception of tRNA-Ser (AGN), tRNA-Ser (AGN) has the deficiency of the dihydrouridine arm. which is a typical feature of metazoan mitochondrial genomes (Cameron 2014). The control region is 4006 bp long and is located between 12S rRNA and tRNA-Ile. ML and BI analyses obtained the consistent topology. The resolution of maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses (Figure 1) both indicates that the newly sequenced species O. chinensis (Coleoptera: Trogidae) shared a close ancestor with Anoplotrupes stercorosus (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae) and closely related to Lucanidae.
Table 3.

Mitogenome organization of Omorgus chinensis.

GeneStrandRegionLength (bp)Start codonStop codonAnti-codonIntergenic nucleotides (bp)
trnI-Ile J1–6666GAT2
trnQ-Gln N69–13769TTG5
trnM-Met J143–21169CAT0
nad2 J212–12251014ATTTAA9
trnW-Trp J1235–130268TCA−8
trnC-Cys N1295–135763GCA0
trnY-Tyr N1358–142265GTA1
COI J1424–29591536AATTAA−5
trnL(UUR)-Leu J2955–301864TAA−2
COII J3017–3704688ATGT0
trnK-Lys J3705–377672CTT4
trnD-Asp J3781–384767GTC0
atp8 J3848–4003156ATTTAA−4
atp6 J4000–4671672ATATAA−1
COIII J4671–5458788ATGTA−1
trnG-Gly J5458–552366TCC0
nad3 J5524–5877354ATTTAG−2
trnA-Ala J5876–594267TGC0
trnR-Arg J5943–600967TCG−1
trnN-Asn J6009–607466GTT0
trnS(AGN)-Ser J6075–614066TCT1
trnE-Glu J6142–620463TTC−2
trnF-Phe N6203–626866GAA−1
nad5 N6268–79881721ATTTA0
trnH-His N7989–805365GTG−1
nad4 N8053–93901338ATGTAA−7
nad4L N9384–9674291ATGTAA2
trnT-Thr J9677–973963TGT0
trnP-Pro N9740–980465TGG1
nad6 J9806–10309504ATCTAA0
Cytb J10310–114581149ATATAG−2
trnS(UCN)-Ser J11457–1152266TGA18
nad1 N11541–12491951ATTTAG0
trnL(CUN)-Leu N12492–1255564TAG0
rrnL N12556–1385513000
trnV N13856–1392570TAC0
rrnS N13926–146767510
Control region 14677–1868240060
Figure 1.

The ML and BI phylogenetic trees of Omorgus chinensis and 17 other scarabs based on 13 PCGs.

The ML and BI phylogenetic trees of Omorgus chinensis and 17 other scarabs based on 13 PCGs. In conclusion, the first complete mitogenome of Trogidae, O. chinensis is a typical metazoan mitogenome. Phylogenetic analysis show that Trogidae shares a close ancestry with Lucanidae and Geotrupidae.
  17 in total

1.  Phylogeny of world stag beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) reveals a Gondwanan origin of Darwin's stag beetle.

Authors:  Sang Il Kim; Brian D Farrell
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  The first complete mitochondrial genome of stag beetle from China, Prosopocoilus gracilis (Coleoptera, Lucanidae).

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Wu; Yu-Yan Cao; Jie Fang; Xia Wan
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.514

3.  Convergent herbivory on conifers by Choristoneura moths after boreal forest formation.

Authors:  Giovanny Fagua; Fabien L Condamine; Bryan M T Brunet; Anne-Laure Clamens; Jérôme Laroche; Roger C Levesque; Michel Cusson; Felix A H Sperling
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation.

Authors:  Matthias Bernt; Alexander Donath; Frank Jühling; Fabian Externbrink; Catherine Florentz; Guido Fritzsch; Joern Pütz; Martin Middendorf; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Mitochondrial genomes of four katydids (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae): New gene rearrangements and their phylogenetic implications.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Fei Ye; Yuan Huang
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs.

Authors:  Peter Schattner; Angela N Brooks; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Higher-level phylogeny of paraneopteran insects inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences.

Authors:  Hu Li; Renfu Shao; Nan Song; Fan Song; Pei Jiang; Zhihong Li; Wanzhi Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mitochondrial genomes of blister beetles (Coleoptera, Meloidae) and two large intergenic spacers in Hycleus genera.

Authors:  Chao Du; Lifang Zhang; Ting Lu; Jingnan Ma; Chenjuan Zeng; Bisong Yue; Xiuyue Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Family-Level Sampling of Mitochondrial Genomes in Coleoptera: Compositional Heterogeneity and Phylogenetics.

Authors:  Martijn J T N Timmermans; Christopher Barton; Julien Haran; Dirk Ahrens; C Lorna Culverwell; Alison Ollikainen; Steven Dodsworth; Peter G Foster; Ladislav Bocak; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.416

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phylogenetic Implication of Large Intergenic Spacers: Insights from a Mitogenomic Comparison of Prosopocoilus Stag Beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae).

Authors:  Mengqiong Xu; Shiju Zhou; Xia Wan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.