Literature DB >> 34993264

Race-insurance disparities in prostate patients' magnetic resonance imaging biopsies and their subsequent cancer care: a New York State cohort study.

Mansi M Chandra1, Seth H Greenspan1, Xiaoning Li1, Jie Yang1, Aurora D Pryor2, Annie Laurie Winkley Shroyer1,3, John P Fitzgerald3.   

Abstract

For organ-confined prostate cancer, socioeconomic factors influencing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy utilization and downstream prostate cancer patients' care are unknown. This retrospective, observational cohort study used the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) billing-code driven database to examine the impact of prostate patients' socioeconomic characteristics on prostate cancer care defined as initial biopsy, 2-month post-biopsy cancer diagnoses, and within 1-year cancer-related intervention, controlling for other risk factors. From 2011-2017, the population studied (n = 18,253) included all New York State-based, male, residents aged 18 to 75 without a prior prostatectomy receiving a first-time biopsy; 760 such patient records in 2016 were removed due to data quality concerns. Major exposures included patient age, race, ethnicity and insurance. The major outcome included receipt of MRI biopsy versus standard biopsy and for these sub-populations, subsequent 2-month post-biopsy metastatic versus non-metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis and within 1-year prostate cancer treatment (prostatectomy with or without radiation versus prostatectomy-only) were compared using dichotomous (primary) and time-to-event (secondary) endpoints. Of 17,493 patients with a first-time prostate biopsy, 3.89% had MRI guided biopsies; of the 17,128 patients with no pre-biopsy cancer diagnosis, the subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis rate was 42.59%. For 6,754 non-metastatic prostate cancer patients with 1-year follow-up, 1,674 (24.79%) received surgery (with or without radiation) and 495 (7.33%) received radiation-only. Holding other factors constant, multivariable regression models identified that race-insurance was a primary predictor of MRI-guided biopsy use. Compared to commercially insured White patients, Black patients across all insurance categories received MRI-guided biopsies less frequently; Commercially insured and self-pay Black patients also had increased chance of prostate cancer diagnosis. Across all insurers, Black patients had lower likelihood of prostatectomies. In contrast, Black and White patients with government insurance were more likely to have within 1-year radiation-only treatments versus commercially insured White patients. Thus, across the prostate cancer care continuum, race-insurance affected prostate cancer-related service utilization. Future research should evaluate the generalizability of these New York State findings. AJCEU
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  New York; Prostate cancer; health disparities; insurance; prostate MRI; prostate biopsy; race

Year:  2021        PMID: 34993264      PMCID: PMC8727785     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol        ISSN: 2330-1910


  20 in total

1.  National Private Payer Coverage of Prostate MRI.

Authors:  Michael T Booker; Ezequiel Silva; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Calculating risk and outcome: the Veterans Affairs database.

Authors:  F L Grover; A L Shroyer; K E Hammermeister
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Monique J Roobol; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Racial disparity in the utilization of multiparametric MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Connor Hoge; Sadhna Verma; Daniel J Lama; Ilana Bergelson; Monzer Haj-Hamed; Sean Maynor; Krishnanath Gaitonde; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Louise C Brown; Rhian Gabe; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh K Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard G Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques.

Authors:  Justin Streicher; Brian Lee Meyerson; Vidhya Karivedu; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-08-28

9.  Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system.

Authors:  Saeed Alqahtani; Cheng Wei; Yilong Zhang; Magdalena Szewczyk-Bieda; Jennifer Wilson; Zhihong Huang; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Rajiv Jayadevan; Ely R Felker; Lorna Kwan; Danielle E Barsa; Haoyue Zhang; Anthony E Sisk; Merdie Delfin; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.