| Literature DB >> 34993135 |
Bingqing Shang1, Liping Guo2, Rongfang Shen3, Chuanzhen Cao1, Ruiyang Xie1, Weixing Jiang4, Li Wen1, Xingang Bi1, Hongzhe Shi1, Shan Zheng5, Changling Li1, Jianhui Ma1, Kaitai Zhang3, Lin Feng3, Jianzhong Shou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus showed a greater tendency for developing metastases after surgery. Early identification of patients with high risk of poor prognosis is especially important to explore adjuvant treatment of improving outcomes. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was a systemic inflammation marker and outcome predictor in RCC, reflecting the chaos in systemic immune status in cancer as myeloid cell expansion and lymphatic cell suppression. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation (NETosis) is the process of neutrophils generating an extracellular DNA net-like structure. NETosis in tumor was demonstrated to conduce to the subsequent metastases of tumor. However, the role of NLR for systemic immune status and tumor local immune infiltration, especially for neutrophil-associated NETs, in non-metastatic RCC with thrombus remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our clinical cohort, we enrolled the clinical, pathologic, and preoperative laboratory parameters of 214 RCC patients with tumor thrombus who were treated surgically. The clinical endpoint was defined as cancer-specific survival (CSS). In our basic research cohort, RNA-seq, TCR-seq, and scRNA-seq data were analyzed. Patients who reached the endpoint as recurrence-free survival (RFS) were defined as the "High-risk" group. Otherwise, they were separated into the "Low-risk" group.Entities:
Keywords: NETosis; NLR; prognosis; renal cell carcinoma; tumor thrombus
Year: 2021 PMID: 34993135 PMCID: PMC8724023 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.771545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of CSS in our clinical cohort.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Age (years) | 1 (0.98–1) | 0.92 | ||
| Gender (Male) | 0.89 (0.49–1.6) | 0.7 | ||
| BMI ≥ 24.7 Kg/m2 | 0.44 (0.26–0.74) | 0.0019 | 0.74 (0.39–1.4) | 0.354 |
| Tumor size ≥7 cm | 3.6 (2–6.6) | <0.001 | 1.94 (0.98–3.8) | 0.059 |
| Tumor laterality (Left) | 2.1 (1.2–3.7) | 0.0076 | 2.05 (1.08–3.9) | 0.028* |
| Paraneoplastic syndrome | 3 (1.6–5.7) | <0.001 | 1.71 (0.77–3.8) | 0.185 |
| Blood transfusion | 3.2 (1.9–5.3) | <0.001 | 0.98 (0.52–1.9) | 0.957 |
| Fuhrman grade 3/4 | 6.6 (3.4–13) | <0.001 | 4.07 (1.80–9.2) | <0.001*** |
| Tumor necrosis | 2.2 (1.3–3.7) | 0.0029 | 0.81 (0.41–1.6) | 0.552 |
| Sarcomatoid differentiation | 3.9 (2.3–6.6) | <0.001 | 1.84 (0.93–3.7) | 0.082 |
| Perineal fat invasion | 3 (1.8–5) | <0.001 | 1.83 (0.99–3.4) | 0.055 |
| LN metastasis | 1.6 (0.63–4) | 0.33 | ||
| Hb | 0.98 (0.98–0.99) | <0.001 | 1 (0.99–1.0) | 0.966 |
| LDH | 1 (1–1) | 0.051 | ||
| ALT | 1 (0.98–1) | 0.95 | ||
| AST | 1 (0.98–1) | 0.66 | ||
| Neutrophil | 1.1 (0.95–1.3) | 0.18 | ||
| Platelet | 1 (1–1) | <0.001 | 1 (1–1) | 0.911 |
| NLR≥4 | 4 (2.2–7.2) | <0.001 | 2.46 (1.18–5.1) | 0.016* |
| IgG | 1.1 (1–1.2) | 0.0021 | 1.01 (0.92–1.1) | 0.894 |
| IgA | 1.3 (1.1–1.5) | 0.0022 | 1.24 (0.97–1.6) | 0.084 |
| IgM | 0.97 (0.78–1.2) | 0.81 | ||
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; Hb, hemoglobin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LN, lymph nodes; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 1The immune-oncology landscape of localized RCC with tumor thrombus. (A) Heatmap of the ssGSEA score, as estimated using gene sets for immune cells and classic oncologic pathways. The top bar indicates the groups stratified by the tissue of tumor or tumor thrombus, the second bar indicates the immune cell infiltration group, and the third bar on the x-axis represents the prognosis of the patients. (B) The average expression of cell cycle and FAO/AMPK signaling and changes in the constituent ratios of infiltrated cell subpopulations including CD8 T cells, Treg cells, NK cells, B cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in the four subgroups for “High-risk” or “Low-risk” group of tumor or tumor thrombus. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. High-risk_T, tumor tissue in the “High-risk” group; High-risk_TT, tumor thrombus tissue in the “High-risk” group; Low-risk _T, tumor tissue in the “Low-risk” group; Low-risk_TT, tumor thrombus tissue in the “Low-risk” group.
Figure 2NETosis induced by tumor-derived G-CSF in tumor thrombus of RCC. (A) Volcano plot of the upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) genes between the group between “High-risk” and “Low-risk” of tumor thrombus. G-CSF and NETs-associated marker genes including Histone family, PADI4, and MMP9, were significantly overexpressed in the “High-risk” group. (B) GSEA plot of the enriched hallmark gene sets derived from GSE7400 was performed with DEGs between “High-risk” and “Low-risk” group of PBMC. (C) IHC was performed in tumor thrombus specimens. H3Cit and MPO were stained during NETosis. (D) The bar plot of the IHC score quantification for H3Cit and MPO between the “High-risk” group and “Low-risk” group. Data were expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 3NETs-score was an independent prognostic factor for localized RCC with tumor thrombus. (A) Heat map of module-trait associations; rows represent the module eigengene, and columns represent clinical traits. (B) Dot plot of the biological process enrichment results in the black module. The dot size and color represent the gene count and enrichment level, respectively. (C) Venn diagram of the 44 overlapping genes were converged in the NETs-associated gene set for signature constructing. black module: 486 genes were found in the black module; neutropath: 41 genes in neutrophil-characteristic GO-terms in this black module; NETs-reference: a summary gene set of NETs-associated genes in prior research. (D) Forest plot of pooled HRs and 95% CI for OS in the TCGA validated data.
Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis in the TCGA cohort.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
| NETs-score | 8.1 (1.8–37) | 0.0064 | 6.5 (1.32–31.5) | 0.021* |
| Age | 1.1 (1–1.2) | 0.002 | 1.1 (1.04–1.2) | 0.001** |
| Gender (Male) | 0.74 (0.29–1.9) | 0.54 | ||
| Fuhrman grade | 2.2 (0.97–5) | 0.058 | 2.2 (0.91–5.1) | 0.079 |
| Tumor laterality | 1.5 (0.57–3.8) | 0.43 | ||
Annotation details for two tables: The second classification variables have been labeled with cutoff values or grouped indicators. Variables that are not labeled with cutoff values were analyzed as continuous variables. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 4TCR diversity was decreased in the “High-risk” group. (A) Changes in the TCRB diversity Chao1 in “High-risk” and “Low-risk” groups. (B) Changes of TOP25% clonotypes in the two representative patients of “High-risk” and “Low-risk” groups. Each circle indicates a clonotype. The size of the circle represents the amount of the clonotype.
Figure 5Perturbations of lymphocytes were induced in the “High-risk” group determined by scRNA. (A) Perioperative PBMC for “High-risk” (3-1) and “Low-risk” (1-1) samples from two treatment-naive localized RCC patients with tumor thrombus are shown. Each dot represents a cell. (B) Sixteen clusters were identified by principal component analysis and visualized with UMAP. (C) UMAP plots show the expression levels of canonical marker genes for 16 cell types. (D) The stack bar plot shows the proportions of all cell subtypes of PBMC. (E) The stack bar plot represents the proportions of all T-cell subtypes of PBMC. The pie chart shows the distribution of TCRB clonotypes in different T-cell subtypes. Expanded clonotype was defined as which is detected more than once.