Yi Nuo1, Aimei Li2, Lulu Yang3, Hailin Xue1, Feng Wang4, Liwei Wang1. 1. Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China. 3. Department of Pathology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined application of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission computed tomography/computed tomography (bpMRI/PET) in the qualitative diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: The 105 patients with suspected PCa included in the study underwent bpMRI and PET/CT. BpMRI examinations included conventional sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Major lesions were qualitatively diagnosed according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). A PET/CT scan was started 60 min after intravenous 68Ga-PSMA-11 injection. The area with the highest radioactivity on PET/CT images was defined as the major lesion, and the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. All cases were confirmed by biopsy and pathology. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed on the data to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the Youden index. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients, 68 patients were diagnosed with PCa, and 37 patients had benign prostatic lesions. With a PI-RADS score ≥3 as the diagnostic threshold, the accuracy of bpMRI in identifying benign and malignant prostate lesions was similar to that of PET/CT (SUVmax threshold ≥10.9), and the Youden indices were 0.60 and 0.64, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 63% and 88%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.51. With an SUVmax ≥12.9 as the diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 74% and 94%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.68. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI/PET in diagnosing PCa were 94% and 81%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.75. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI/PET in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 80% and 88%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.68. CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of bpMRI and PET improves the accuracy of the qualitative diagnosis of prostate lesions, and its diagnostic efficacy for risk stratification in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa is similar to that of PET/CT and higher than that of bpMRI alone. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined application of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission computed tomography/computed tomography (bpMRI/PET) in the qualitative diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: The 105 patients with suspected PCa included in the study underwent bpMRI and PET/CT. BpMRI examinations included conventional sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Major lesions were qualitatively diagnosed according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). A PET/CT scan was started 60 min after intravenous 68Ga-PSMA-11 injection. The area with the highest radioactivity on PET/CT images was defined as the major lesion, and the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. All cases were confirmed by biopsy and pathology. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed on the data to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the Youden index. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients, 68 patients were diagnosed with PCa, and 37 patients had benign prostatic lesions. With a PI-RADS score ≥3 as the diagnostic threshold, the accuracy of bpMRI in identifying benign and malignant prostate lesions was similar to that of PET/CT (SUVmax threshold ≥10.9), and the Youden indices were 0.60 and 0.64, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 63% and 88%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.51. With an SUVmax ≥12.9 as the diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 74% and 94%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.68. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI/PET in diagnosing PCa were 94% and 81%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.75. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI/PET in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 80% and 88%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.68. CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of bpMRI and PET improves the accuracy of the qualitative diagnosis of prostate lesions, and its diagnostic efficacy for risk stratification in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa is similar to that of PET/CT and higher than that of bpMRI alone. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Prostate cancer (PCa); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); positron emission computed tomography (PET); prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)
Authors: Robert M Hicks; Jeffry P Simko; Antonio C Westphalen; Hao G Nguyen; Kirsten L Greene; Li Zhang; Peter R Carroll; Thomas A Hope Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hashim U Ahmed; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Louise C Brown; Rhian Gabe; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh K Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard G Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Mark Emberton Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 79.321