Ex vivo lung perfusion.

Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end stage lung disease. The imbalance between lung graft supply and recipients has been a serious issue and barrier to successful lung transplantation. Ex vivo lung perfusion is a strategy wherein lungs are perfused and ventilated outside of the body. This technology has emerged as a safe preservation method that also enables the reassessment and reconditioning of marginal lung grafts. Ex vivo lung perfusion has successfully expanded the donor pool and led to greater lung transplant activity worldwide. Furthermore, ex vivo lung perfusion can be used as a platform for advanced diagnostics that enable specific targeted or personalized treatments that can be developed along a bench to bedside pathway leading to safe ex vivo intervention. Recent findings have shown that ex vivo lung perfusion could significantly and safely extend the preservation period, which enables transplant programs further optimization of the logistics around transplantation surgeries, and create a new paradigm whereby donor lungs are assessed at a centralized ex vivo lung perfusion center prior to delivery to a transplant clinic in need. The introduction of ex vivo lung perfusion to clinical lung transplantation has been a major step in the evolution and practice of lung transplantation. 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with various end stage lung diseases. However, a shortage of suitable lung grafts has been a major limiting factor, leading to significant mortality on waiting lists; the death rate is as high as 15–20% (1,2). Major causes of the insufficient graft supply include the low number of neurologically determined death donors (NDD) and the low rate of acceptable donor lung grafts (18.6–30%) (3,4). Several strategies to expand the utilization of acceptable lung grafts have been applied, including single lung transplantation, cadaveric and living donor lobar lung transplantations, the use of extended criteria donors (ECD), and donation after cardiocirculatory death donors (DCD). Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has emerged as a new solution to increase transplantable lung grafts. EVLP is a strategy wherein donor lungs are perfused and ventilated outside of the body. EVLP has successfully expanded lung graft pools by reassessing lung grafts from ECD and DCD with comparable short- and long-term outcomes (5,6).

Lung grafts are exposed to various injuries during the process of brain death and cardiocirculatory death, such as pneumonia, ventilator associated lung injury, and neurogenic and hydrostatic pulmonary edema. Moreover, lung grafts from DCD can experience additional injuries, including aspiration, warm ischemia, hypoxemia, and hypotension (shock lung). Primary graft dysfunction (PGD), which derives from ischemia-reperfusion injury plus other underlying graft injuries, impairs graft quality that, in turn, has been shown to affect short- and long-term morbidity and mortality (7-9). Many lung transplant programs are reluctant to use ECD and DCD lung grafts due to the risk of PGD, and this compounds the problem of insufficient lung graft supply.

EVLP has been developed as an advanced strategy to address the shortage of transplantable lung grafts. EVLP enables the precise reassessment of lungs from ECD and DCD donors, enhances the management of logistical issues by extending preservation time safely (10,11), and provides a platform for advanced molecular diagnosis (12), specific targeted treatments (13-15) and injured lung graft repair (16). This chapter reviews the rationale for EVLP, as well as a discussion of different protocols, perspectives as an advanced diagnostic and organ repair platform, and its use as a logistical enhancement tool.

Rationale behind the method of EVLP

The current clinical practice for donor lung preservation is cold static preservation (17,18). The induced hypothermia protects lung grafts by reducing cell metabolism, oxygen requirement and nutrient consumption. On the other hand, cold static preservation presents several limitations, including an inability for physiological assessment and the identification of hidden lung injuries which, along with reperfusion injury, can manifest as PGD.

Normothermic EVLP overcomes these issues by enabling cellular metabolic function via a supply of oxygen and nutrients. EVLP is a form of lung preservation with real-time physiological assessment that can also support the recovery of lung grafts.

The development of contemporary EVLP can be divided into three steps: (I) concept of ex vivo organ perfusion; (II) short periods of EVLP with optimized colloid pressure solution; and (III) long periods of EVLP with lung protective ventilation and perfusion.

Leonardo da Vinci first described isolated organ perfusion in his sketches from the fifteenth century. Alexis Carrel and Charles Lindbergh proposed the idea of ex vivo organ perfusion in 1935 (19). Isolated EVLP was first described in 1970 by Jirsch et al., detailing the preservation and evaluation of lungs in cases of distant procurement (20). Unfortunately, those predecessors’ attempts at EVLP failed due to the inability to maintain the alveolar–capillary barrier, leading to the development of edema and increased pulmonary vascular resistance-related injuries.

Thirty years later, the contemporary EVLP concept was introduced by Steen and colleagues (21). They overcame issues regarding the alveolar-capillary barrier via the development of STEEN SolutionTM (XVIVO Perfusion, Goteborg, Sweden), a buffered extracellular solution with optimized colloid pressure, which serves as the lung perfusate. This preservation solution maintains fluid within the intravascular space and provides nutrients necessary for pulmonary homeostasis during perfusion (21-23). In 2006, Steen used a short period of EVLP to assess lung grafts prior to successful transplantation (24). However, because of circuit-induced lung injuries, the EVLP technique did not result in a stable preservation period longer than 60 minutes (25).

Thereafter, the Toronto group modified this EVLP technology by using an optimal lung protective strategy with low tidal volume ventilation and a low flow rate combined with a centrifuge pump. The Toronto EVLP method achieved an extended period of stable perfusion of more than 12 hours (26). During Toronto EVLP, lung grafts can be re-evaluated and reconditioned by decreasing extravascular water, reducing harmful and toxic waste products, and recruiting atelectatic areas. EVLP reconditioning results in better ventilation/perfusion matching, and improved microcirculation (26,27). In 2011, the Toronto group reported the successful use of lung allografts from ECD after using their EVLP protocol (6). Subsequently, several promising clinical trials have been performed worldwide (6,11,28,29). Currently, EVLP has become a part of clinical practice in North America, Europe, and Australia (30-33).

EVLP protocols

EVLP is a concept that includes the perfusion of donor lungs outside of the body using a device that features cellular or acellular solutions, ventilation and normothermia. Three EVLP protocols are currently used worldwide: Toronto, Lund, and Organ Care SystemTM (OCSTM) (Transmedics, Andover, MA, USA). The protocols share some similarities; however, they differ in several aspects, such as components of the perfusate, target flow, target pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, open or closed left atrium (LA), and ventilator settings. In the Toronto and Lund protocols, the lung grafts are preserved in a conventional cold static method and are connected to an EVLP system at the recipient hospital or a centralized facility. On the other hand, the OCS Lung is a portable EVLP system, and the lungs are connected to this system at the donor hospital. Currently, most transplant programs employ the Toronto or OCS Lung protocol, and some employ one of these techniques with additional modifications (34,35).

Toronto EVLP equipment

Toronto EVLP is performed in an operating room with a team comprised of a surgeon experienced with EVLP, surgical assistants, a perfusionist and a circulating operating room nurse. The Toronto EVLP circuit includes a centrifugal pump, heater/cooler, tubes, reservoir, membrane oxygenator, leukocyte filter, flow censor, pressure transducers, ventilator, bronchoscope system with a monitor, mixture of gases (86% N2, 8% CO2, 6% O2) with a cylinder, specific cannulas, and a plastic organ chamber (26,36) (). An ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiator can be applied to inactivate microorganisms in perfusate, such as lungs from hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors (37).

Figure 1

The schema of Toronto EVLP. Gas for deoxygenation consists of 86% N2, 8% CO2, 6% O2. *, bridge between inflow and outflow. The bridge is closed during perfusion. The bridge can be used for de-air from inflow line. Arrows indicate the direction of perfusate flow. Arrow colors indicate oxygenation of the perfusate; red indicates oxygenated perfusate and blue indicates de-oxygenated perfusate. UVC irradiator is optional. EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion; UVC, ultraviolet C.

The room for Toronto EVLP should be large enough to house the entire set of components, as well as two surgical tables (i.e., a surgical back table and a table for the organ chamber), additional monitors and a desk (). A nearby gas analyzer is required for perfusate analysis. A secured electronic system is needed to share updated information describing hourly assessments to the transplant team.

Figure 2

Toronto EVLP technique. (A) Toronto EVLP system. a: organ chamber; b: table for organ chamber; c: back table; d: monitor for bronchoscope; e: EVLP circuit. (B) LA and LA cannula connection. LA and LA cannula are sewn with 4-0 polypropylene sutures. (C) In the case of a short LA. Left: short LA. Right: LA is fixed with pericardium and 4-0 polypropylene sutures before cannulation. (D) Left and middle: the tip of endotracheal tube was removed. Right: the trachea was closed with a clamp and the endotracheal tube is fixed to the trachea with heavy silk ties. (E) Connection of PA and LA cannulas to the circuit. Left: connecting Inflow tube to PA cannula after de-air PA cannula and pulmonary vasculature. LA cannula was open at this time. Middle: connecting outflow tube and LA cannula. Clamp on outflow cannula was removed immediately after connection. Right: cannulas and circuit were connected. PA and LA cannulas were fixed to the chamber without kinking of PA and pulmonary veins. EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion; LA, left atrium; PA, pulmonary artery.

Commercially available devices that use the Toronto EVLP protocol include the portable XVIVO Perfusion System (XPSTM) (XPS Perfusion, Goteborg, Sweden) and Lung AssistTM (Organ Assist, Groningen, Netherlands).

Toronto EVLP technique

The Toronto EVLP technique is the most widely used and referenced method in clinical lung transplantation and preclinical research to date, primarily due to the ability to perform safe and extended EVLP. The main differences between the Toronto technique and other EVLP methods are: (I) the use of an acellular perfusate, (II) a closed circuit with a positive LA pressure, and (III) low perfusion flow.

After lung graft recovery using a standard cold static preservation technique, the pulmonary bloc is dissected on a back table at the recipient hospital or a centralized center. A specific cuffed LA cannula is trimmed and sewn to the LA using two 4-0 polypropylene running sutures (). In case of LA injury or a short LA cuff, the cuff can be repaired with a pericardium for cannulation (). If the PA trunk is of sufficient length, the straight cannula is directly inserted and secured with heavy silk ties. In case of a short PA trunk, a specific cuffed PA cannula is trimmed and sewn to the PA using two 5-0 polypropylene running sutures. The trachea is clamped above the first carina level to keep lungs inflated, and the staples are then removed. With its oblique tip removed, a regular endotracheal tube () is inserted into the trachea and secured with heavy silk ties (). Then, the endotracheal tube is clamped, and the clamp on the trachea is released. A retrograde flush with 1 L of Perfadex® solution (XVIVO Perfusion) is performed via the LA cannula at the back table (38).

The lungs are placed in the EVLP dome and the PA cannula is connected to the circuit after de-airing (). Then, the LA cannula is connected to the circuit. The cannulas are attached to the dome without kinking of the PA and pulmonary veins (). The EVLP circuit is primed with 2 L of STEEN solution and 500 mg of methylprednisolone, 3,000 IU of unfractionated heparin and 500 mg of imipenem/cilastatin. The lungs are gradually warmed by increasing the perfusate temperature, via setting the heater-cooler to 30 °C at 10 min and 37 °C at 20 min. The perfusate flow rate is set as 10% of the target flow (40% of cardiac output) at the beginning, and is increased to the maximum flow step by step (20% of the target flow at 10 min, 30% at 20 min, 50% at 30 min, 80% at 40 min, and 100% at 50 min). LA pressure is maintained at 3 to 5 mmHg by adjusting the reservoir height. PA pressure is normally <13 mmHg, and determined by perfusate flow, pulmonary vascular resistance, and LA pressure. At 20–30 min after EVLP start, perfusate temperature is gradually increased. When the perfusate temperature reaches 32 °C, protective ventilation (FiO2 of 21%, tidal volume of 7 mL/kg, respiratory rate of 7 breaths/min, and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O) is targeted, followed by a gas mixture flow at 1 L /min. The post-membrane partial pressure of CO2 is adjusted between 35 and 40 mmHg by titrating the sweep gas flow. A lung recruitment maneuver (up to 25 cmH2O of peak airway pressure or 15 mL/kg, 20 sec, 2 times) is performed at 60 min of perfusion and then between hourly assessments. STEEN solution is partially exchanged hourly: 500 mL at the first hour and 250 mL at every hour thereafter. Hourly lung function evaluation is conducted after 5 minutes of ventilation on 100% FiO2, tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and respiratory rate of 10/min. Hourly lung evaluation is performed by measuring the ratio of PaO2 and fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) in LA effluent and PA influent, along with PA pressure, dynamic and static compliances, peak airway pressures, and hourly loss of STEEN solution. Lung radiography and flexible bronchoscopy are routinely performed at 1 hour and 3 hours of EVLP (38). When localized lung injuries are suspected, a differential measurement of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio is performed by sampling perfusate from each pulmonary vein.

At the end of EVLP, the lung block is cooled down to 10 °C in the circuit over a 10-minute period. Thereafter, perfusion and ventilation are stopped (FiO2 is increased to 50% for lung storage), and the tracheal tube is clamped to keep the lungs inflated at 7 mL/kg and PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The trachea is stapled, and an antegrade flush is performed with 1.5 L of cold Perfadex solution via the PA cannula. The PA and LA cannula are then removed, and the lungs are stored with a conventional cold static preservation method until implantation.

Toronto EVLP donor and acceptance criteria

Most transplant groups use the Toronto EVLP technique to reassess and recondition ECD and DCD lung grafts. The criteria for using Toronto EVLP are summarized in . The Vienna group demonstrated that Toronto EVLP-assessed lungs from standard criteria donors safely extended preservation time with equivalent outcomes to the standard cold preservation (11). The basic criteria for lung graft acceptance for lung transplantation after Toronto EVLP are shown in . The decision to transplant is made by using a set of acceptance criteria, including delta pO2, lung compliance, X-ray findings, bronchoscopic findings, and physical assessment (39).

Table 1

Indication for EVLP

Best PaO2/FiO2 lower than 300 mmHg

Presence of pulmonary edema: on chest X-ray or in the clinical assessment

Poor lung/lobe compliance

High risk history

Lung from marginal DCD

DCD, donor. The table is modified from Ref. (36). EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion; WLST, withdrawal of life support therapy.

Table 2

Acceptance and exclusion criteria after 4–6 h of ex vivo lung perfusion

Acceptance criteria

Delta pO2 ≥350 mmHg

Stable or improving pulmonary artery pressure

Stable or improving airway pressures

Stable or improving pulmonary compliance

Acceptable STEEN solution loss

Exclusion criteria

Delta pO2 <350 mmHg

>15% deterioration on pulmonary artery pressure

>15% deterioration on airway pressure

>15% deterioration on pulmonary compliance

The table is modified from Ref. (38). Delta pO2, difference of PaO2 between samples from left atrium and pulmonary artery under FiO2 of 1.0.

Outcome of Toronto EVLP

Even with prolonged graft preservation, EVLP provides equivalent short-term outcomes (6), functional outcomes (40), and long-term outcomes (5). Moreover, the Toronto group reported successful utilization of lungs from uncontrolled DCD (non-perfused organ donor) with up to 3 hours of warm ischemia followed by EVLP assessment (41). Clinical use of EVLP has enabled the Toronto program to expand their annual lung transplantation activity by 70%. Moreover, the experience has enhanced confidence in the utilization of DCD lungs and high-risk NDD lungs, with an average of 70% utilization of donor lungs treated with EVLP. Outcomes across low- and high-risk DCD, high-risk NDD, and EVLP used for logistical reasons are excellent (42).

OCS lung

OCS Lung is the first portable EVLP system. OCS Lung is mainly used for standard donor lungs, and addresses issues regarding cold ischemic storage by maintaining the organ in a normothermic and physiologically functioning state throughout transportation. OCS Lung differs from the Toronto EVLP technique; it uses a blood-based perfusate with a modified perfusion rate and different pump. The technique also uses an open LA, whereas Toronto EVLP employs a positive left atrial pressure of 3–5 mmHg ().

In 2012, the Hanover and Madrid groups published a feasibility study using OCS Lung as a primary lung preservation method with standard criteria donors, as an alternative to conventional cold static preservation (32). A combined liver–lung transplantation following stable 675 minutes of EVLP using OCS Lung was reported by the Leuven group in 2014 (43). A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial (INSPIRE trial) was performed from November 2011 to November 2014. Results showed non-inferiority of OCS Lung outcomes compared with standard cold preservation (28).

OCS Lung has also been used for lung grafts from ECD and DCD. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial evaluating OCS Lung for lungs from ECD and DCD (EXPAND trial) showed 87% donor lung utilization rate with excellent post-transplant clinical outcomes (29).

EVLP as a platform for specific treatments

Given that donor lungs can be maintained in a physiologically functioning state prior to transplantation, research studies are now exploring the potential to use EVLP as a platform for advanced therapies to create better lungs for recipients. Lungs are typically perfused for 4 to 6 hours. The Toronto EVLP technique can reliably and reproducibly preserve lungs for 12 hours, which could enable extracorporeal biological treatments that require an extended time period to achieve its desired effect (26). Extension of the EVLP time frame is an ongoing interest in lung transplantation (44) and can permit further advanced diagnostic tests and time-dependent molecular therapies (45). This will improve graft quality and potentially increase the donor lung pool. Recently, stable 24 hours of EVLP was achieved by supplementing nutritional requirements in both the Toronto EVLP and OCS Lung techniques (46,47).

Several EVLP-based therapeutic approaches have been studied, whereby injuries identified during lung graft assessment on EVLP can inform the application of personalized therapies during the EVLP time window. These therapies include successful administration of drugs, such as antibiotics, fibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory drugs, gene therapy, cell-based therapy, and application of therapeutic devices such as dialysis and an UVC irradiator. Given that the lung graft is isolated on EVLP, each of these strategies can be administered at high concentration via the vasculature or airway without the risk of systemic toxicity. Specific EVLP-based treatments and their current status toward clinical application are described below and summarized in .

Table 3

EVLP as a platform for specific treatments (13-16,37,48-67)

VLP-based treatment	Experimental			Preclinical human EVLP	Clinical EVLP
	Small animal EVLP	Large animal EVLP	Human Lung EVLP
Fibrinolysis for PE		✔(48)			✔(15)
Surfactant		✔(14)
α1 antitrypsin		✔(49)		✔(50)
adenosine A2B receptor		✔(51)
β2-adrenergic receptor agonists		✔(53,54)	✔(52)
High dose antibiotics				✔(13)	✔(55)
Gene therapy		✔(56)		✔(16)
Cell based therapy
Mesenchymal stromal cells	✔(61)	✔(58,59)	✔(57)	✔(60)
Regulatory T cells	✔(62)
UVC irradiation		✔(37)		✔(37)	✔(63)
Hemofiltration/hemodialysis		✔(65)			✔(64)
Cytokine filtration		✔(66)
Prone EVLP		✔(67)

The numbers in the table indicate references. EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion; PE, pulmonary embolism; UVC, ultraviolet C.

Fibrinolysis for pulmonary embolism

Lung donors with pulmonary thromboembolism are associated with PGD; removal of the emboli reduces the incidence of PGD (68). Pulmonary embolism can be treated during EVLP. This concept is important for DCD lungs without systemic anticoagulation. In 2007, Inci et al. evaluated the effect of urokinase during a modified EVLP system in a pig DCD model. They demonstrated that 100,000 U of urokinase treatment during EVLP improved pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygenation, and wet-to-dry ratio (48). They also reported their successful clinical experience of fibrinolysis and administration of 100,000 U of urokinase during EVLP in donor lungs with pulmonary embolism (69). In 2012, Machuca et al. reported the use of alteplase on donor lungs with pulmonary embolism and placed on Toronto EVLP. They administered 20 mg of alteplase into the EVLP circuit and demonstrated successful lung transplantation (15). In 2015, Luc et al. reported the addition of 5 mg of alteplase to OCS lung EVLP for DCD lung grafts with massive pulmonary embolism resulted in successful thrombolysis (70).

Surfactant

Aspiration is a common event in organ donors (71). Injured lungs as a result of aspiration are not suitable for transplantation because of decreased quality and function, and the higher possibility of PGD (72). Several attempts have been made to repair lungs with aspiration injury during EVLP. A team in Zurich used a pig aspiration model to demonstrate the protective effects of lavaging the donor lung with surfactant during EVLP (73), with improved graft function using a second pig aspiration model simulating controlled DCD (74). Nakajima et al. showed that lavage and surfactant administration via the airway during EVLP improved graft function and reduced proinflammatory cytokine expression levels in a pig aspiration model with 10 hours of cold ischemic time (CIT) and 6 hours of EVLP followed by a single left lung transplantation (14).

Pharmacological anti-inflammatory treatment

α1 antitrypsin (A1AT) is a serine-protease inhibitor that acts as an acute phase reactant during inflammation. Recently, Lin et al. demonstrated that administration of A1AT into EVLP perfusate resulted in improved physiological function with a reduction in the levels of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and IL-8 (49). Mariscal et al. demonstrated that A1AT administration during EVLP using lungs rejected for clinical transplantation improved oxygenation and reduced pulmonary vascular resistance and perfusate loss. Furthermore, A1AT treatment decreased endothelin-1 level in perfusate and ZO-1 expression on endothelial cells (50).

Adenosine plays a role in purinergic signaling during inflammation. Among its receptors, adenosine A2B receptor activation results in a pro-inflammatory effect in lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Charles et al. successfully showed the protective effect of an adenosine A2B receptor blocker in a pig model of DCD lungs on EVLP, with 2 hours of warm ischemia followed by lung transplantation (51).

β2-adrenergic receptor agonists

β2-adrenergic receptors are widely distributed in the lungs. Their stimulation leads to the relaxation of bronchial and pulmonary vascular smooth muscle (75). Frank et al. conducted an experiment to measure alveolar fluid clearance using human lungs declined for transplantation. They demonstrated that the basal alveolar fluid clearance was 19%/h on EVLP. Intra-airway administration of terbutaline increased alveolar fluid clearance to 43%/h per with lower lung weight gain (52). Valenza et al. used a pig EVLP model to demonstrate that infusion of salbutamol in the EVLP circuit decreased mean PA pressure and increased dynamic compliance (53). Recently, the Kyoto group demonstrated that high dose procaterol inhalation during EVLP improved graft function using a canine DCD model (54).

High dose antibiotics

Lung grafts are vulnerable to bacterial and fungus infection and contamination, which lead to increased morbidity in immunosuppressed recipients (76). EVLP can serve as a platform to apply high dose anti-bacterial and anti-fungal drug treatment without causing systemic side effects. The Newcastle group demonstrated high dose antibiotics treatment for human lungs on EVLP that were initially considered not suitable for transplantation. They transplanted 6 out of 18 lungs that resulted in no in-hospital mortality (55). The Toronto group showed that the use of high dose broad spectrum antibiotics during EVLP significantly reduced bronchoalveolar lavage bacterial counts and endotoxin levels with improved donor lung function (13).

Gene therapy

The Toronto group has been investigating gene therapy to repair injured human donor lungs—specifically, gene therapy via adenoviral vector encoding human IL-10. Using lungs unsuitable for clinical transplantation, intra-airway adenoviral vector encoding human IL-10 treatment during 12 hours of EVLP showed significant improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and pulmonary vascular resistance, with a favorable shift from pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine expression and recovered alveolar-blood barriers (16). Machuca et al. performed a pig EVLP experiment with intra-airway adenoviral vector encoding human IL-10 treatment followed by left lung transplantation and 7-day survival. Results showed persistent detection of human IL-10 in pig plasma for 7 days and improved graft function at 7 days after lung transplantation. Lymphocytes from the adenoviral vector encoding human IL-10-treated group showed less interferon gamma production at 7 days post-lung transplantation (56).

Cell based therapy

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are known to have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects that may ameliorate lung injuries. The use of MSCs for personalized therapy on EVLP has been investigated. Matthay’s group showed that the instillation of MSCs in human lungs with endotoxin-induced lung injury during EVLP resulted in decreased endothelial permeability, reduced extravascular lung water, and restored alveolar fluid clearance (57).

During EVLP, there are two routes for the administration of MSCs: airway and vasculature. Mordant et al. investigated the optimal route and showed that MSC administration via the vasculature is more effective than the airway (58). Nakajima et al. demonstrated that EVLP MSC treatment via vasculature ameliorated ischemia-reperfusion injury in a pig EVLP model followed by left single lung transplantation (59). Nykanen et al. reported the feasibility of using MSCs genetically engineered to produce anti-inflammatory IL-10 and applied into the perfusate in a pig EVLP model with 24 hours of cold static preservation followed by left single lung transplantation with 3 day survival (77). Furthermore, they conducted a preclinical study regarding the application of genetically engineered MSCs during EVLP using human lungs declined for clinical use. Results showed that genetically engineered MSCs were retained in the lung and IL-10 levels in EVLP perfusate were rapidly increased. In an improvement from their previous pre-clinical study, perfusate IL-10 level declined after 4–6 hours of perfusion, particularly in lungs with low perfusate pH and glucose, and high lactate levels (60).

The Milan group reported that MSC-derived extracellular vesicles decreased pulmonary vascular resistance and wet-dry ratio, and improved molecular phenotype in a rat EVLP model (61).

Miyamoto et al. used EVLP and regulatory T cells (Tregs) to achieve allograft immune regulation before lung transplantation. They established a rat EVLP model followed by left single lung transplantation with a 3-day survival period. Cryopreserved Tregs applied to the EVLP circuit exerted immunomodulatory effects in vivo and in vitro (62).

Light therapy

One of the unique aspects of the EVLP system is that external treatment of the circulating perfusate can be used to rehabilitate the ex vivo lung. The Toronto group applied light therapy (i.e., UVC) to perfusate during EVLP in order to observe if there is any effect in minimizing the risk of viremia. Galasso et al. used a pig EVLP transplant model to show the safe reduction of HCV load in HCV-positive donors using UVC light integrated with the EVLP circuit () (37). Furthermore, the group demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lung transplantation from HCV-positive donors to HCV-negative recipients after EVLP combined with 400 mg sofosbuvir and 100 mg velpatasvir treatment after transplantation. There was equivalent 6-month survival in recipients receiving HCV-positive (95%) vs. HCV-negative donor lungs (94%). 86% of patients receiving HCV-positive donor lungs were HCV-free at 6 months after transplantation. In addition, UVC treatment on EVLP showed significant reduction of viral load, and prevented HCV transmission in 2 out of 11 patients (63).

Hemofiltration and cytokine filtration

During EVLP, osmotic pressure can change, in addition to a reduction in glucose and increases in electrolyte and lactate levels (49,78). In the Toronto EVLP technique, the perfusate is partially replaced every hour. The Gothenburg group applied hemofiltration to maintain osmotic pressure during EVLP (64). Nilsson et al. performed an experiment using a pig lung edema model and found that hemofiltration increased the oncotic pressure of the perfusate and decreased lung weight with a beneficial effect on lung compliance, but did not improve lung oxygenation capacity (65).

The Edmonton group used a pig EVLP negative pressure ventilation model (79) to test if continuous hemodialysis stabilized electrolyte levels during EVLP. They successfully maintained sodium levels in perfusate for over 24 hours of EVLP. However, continuous hemodialysis-treated lungs did not show improved graft function or reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine elevation (80).

Cytokines and chemokines are released during lung ischemia-reperfusion injury, activating innate immune cell activity including neutrophil recruitment. This leads to capillary leakage and cell death, which result in subsequent lung allograft damage (81). These cytokines and chemokines accumulate in EVLP perfusate (49). The Okayama group used a pig EVLP model to show that the application of an adsorbent membrane suppressed IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α early after EVLP but did not improve lung graft function (82). The Zurich group demonstrated the safety and efficacy of cytokine filtration in a 12-hour pig EVLP model. They showed that cytokine filtration resulted in a significant reduction of multiple cytokines with improved lung graft function (66).

Prone positioning

The dorsal portion of the lung is more susceptible to atelectasis. Prone positioning has shown beneficial effects for patients with lung injury (83). Prone positioning also improved graft function in a pig DCD EVLP model (84). Niikawa et al. tested the role of prone positioning of lungs on EVLP and demonstrated better oxygenation and lung compliance, lower weight ratio, and lower IL-1β levels in prone position lungs compared to control lungs in supine position (67).

EVLP as bench to bedside pathway

Novel pre-clinical treatments to improve lung quality have been extensively studied. However, the translation of these studies to the clinic are challenged by different physiological conditions across in vitro, small animal, large animal, and human models. The use of EVLP as a research tool can help with this bench to bedside knowledge transfer (). For example, the Toronto group has investigated the clinical application of A1AT to ameliorate ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation, using EVLP to verify outcomes across pre-clinical models. This includes studying A1AT in cell culture, rat hilum clamp model, and pig lung transplantation with short-term assessment and pig EVLP application (85-87). Together, this has informed the safety and efficacy of A1AT in a pig lung transplant model with 3-day survival (49). As the final step toward clinical application, EVLP using clinically declined human donor lungs served as the final preclinical study environment (50).

Figure 3

Bench to bedside translation pathway. EVLP can be used to help translate outcomes across physiological conditions in in vitro, small animal, large animal, and human research models. Small animal EVLP can be used to test the effect of drugs in isolated lungs and develop novel therapies with a variety of biochemical assessment tools at a relatively low cost. Large aminal EVLP can be used to test the effects and safety of novel therapies that represents physiologically close conditions to a clinical scenario. EVLP can utilize clinically declined human lungs as a translational step toward clinical application of each investigated therapy. EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion.

For over 20 years, the Toronto group has also been working on IL-10 gene therapy for lung transplantation, using small animal models, preclinical EVLP using rejected human lungs, and pig EVLP followed by lung transplantation with 7-day survival model (16,56,88-90). This serial progression towards clinical application exemplifies EVLP as an excellent translational research platform.

EVLP as an advanced diagnostic tool

The assessment of cellular function during cold static preservation is challenging due to the low metabolic state of the lung. In contrast, normothermic EVLP maintains the physiological and metabolic activity of the lung graft. Assessment of graft quality during EVLP is primarily reported via physiological parameters, including ventilation and standard arterial blood gas analyses of perfusate samples. In addition, perfusate analysis, such as glucose consumption and lactate level, enables metabolic state evaluation (78). One of the unique features of EVLP perfusate is that it enables insight into the holistic changes occurring in the lung graft, independent of other organs. Therefore, changes in inflammatory cytokines and cell death markers can be attributed solely to donor lung activity and used as a biomarker to precisely predict post-lung transplantation outcomes.

Machuca et al. reported protein expression levels using clinical EVLP samples divided into three groups: control (good early outcomes); PGD 3; and declined (lungs declined after EVLP). The team concluded that IL-8 and growth-regulated oncogene-α best differentiated between control and PGD 3, and stem cell growth factor-β differentiated between control and declined lungs (12). They also identified higher endothelin-1 and big endothelin-1 expression in declined lung perfusate compared to control (91). Andreasson et al. reported IL-1β is the most effective marker to differentiate in-hospital survival vs. non-survival post-transplant (92).

Hashimoto et al. tested circulating cell death marker expression levels in EVLP perfusate across control (good early outcome) and PGD 3 groups. They demonstrated that M30 (indicating epithelial cell apoptosis) is higher in the PGD 3 group. Also, the increase of high mobility group box-1 from 1 to 4 hours of EVLP was greater in the PGD 3 group (93).

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are accumulated in experimental and human PGD (94). NETs could serve as additional useful biomarkers of severe PGD and allograft injury at the time of transplant. A recent study showed that NET levels during EVLP correlates with adverse recipient outcomes (95).

Molecular-based diagnosis during EVLP will help to enable the development of rapid diagnostic platforms that will aid in the clinical decision to use EVLP lungs for transplant and predict lung transplant outcomes. Currently, clinical decision-making during EVLP is based on physiological parameters, direct visual assessment, and X-ray findings that, together with subjective clinical judgement, only provide a part of the status of lung injury. Sage et al. developed a cytokine-based score using a novel rapid testing device to assist lung transplant team decision-making. They conducted a retrospective study using biobanked clinical EVLP perfusate samples to develop biological mediators that predict: (I) if a lung would be acceptable for transplant following EVLP; and (II) the contribution of that donor lung to a favorable recipient outcome. They created a model that includes donor characteristics and perfusate-derived mediators of inflammation to predict, with >70% accuracy, good transplant outcome (96). The utility of this novel EVLP diagnostic platform was further validated using prospectively collected perfusate samples (97).

EVLP as a logistic tool and organ repair hub

EVLP can safely prolong lung preservation. In fact, PGD remained low despite significantly longer preservation on EVLP (10,98). The routine use of normothermic EVLP for greater than 12 hours of preservation led to excellent recipient outcomes in Toronto (10). Moreover, a prospective randomized trial by the Vienna group showed that extended preservation time on EVLP for standard criteria donor lungs did not compromise lung graft quality (11).

Total lung preservation time during EVLP is the sum of 4 distinct intervals. (I) CIT1: the period of cold static preservation from cross clamp followed by cold flush to the start of normothermic EVLP); (II) normothermic EVLP time; (III) CIT2: the period of cold static preservation after EVLP and before placement in the recipient’s chest; and (IV) warm ischemic time (WIT): implantation time; the time from the placement of the graft in the chest to reperfusion (45,99). Therefore, EVLP can be used to extend overall lung preservation time by splitting CIT into two short CIT periods divided by an additional EVLP time window ().

Figure 4

Schema of emergent clinical applications of EVLP. (A) EVLP as a preservation strategy for semi-elective lung transplantation. (B) EVLP as a therapeutic platform for advanced approaches relevant to organ repair and regeneration. (C) Model for high-volume specialized organ assessment and repair centers. The figure is modified from Ref. (45). EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion.

EVLP can have a beneficial effect on hospital logistics regarding lung transplantation; by extending total ischemic time, EVLP may help to optimize OR room availability, staffing arrangements, and transporting the transplant recipient from distant areas to the hospital (45). A recent large animal study showed that cold static preservation at 10 °C with 2 short cycles of EVLP safely extends the lung preservation period up to 3 days (100). Extended periods of EVLP will also enable complex biological treatments such as gene and cell-based therapies ().

Hospitals with low lung transplant volumes may not have the means or desire to integrate an EVLP program since the technology requires specialized equipment, technical experts and operating space. A centralized EVLP service model is a concept whereby dedicated centers are equipped for high volume EVLP assessment and reconditioning of donor lungs prior to sending to recipient lung transplant centers without an EVLP program (101). The model includes donor lung recovery and transportation to a nearby EVLP center. The donor lungs are then perfused by a trained EVLP team and offered to transplant centers in need, should the lungs satisfy acceptance criteria. Once accepted, these lungs are transported to the recipient hospital and prepared for implantation () (45). An ongoing clinical trial in a facility in the US (identifier: NCT03641677) will evaluate the feasibility of this concept.

Conclusions

EVLP has emerged as an advanced preservation tool for lung transplantation, and has successfully expanded lung transplant utility by rescuing high-risk donor lungs and optimizing transplant logistics. EVLP can also serve as a critical translational research tool to bring novel therapies from bench to bedside. Several personalized treatments have been developed for use specifically during EVLP, and advanced therapies and rapid diagnostics will further help to utilize more lungs for transplantation. EVLP remains strongly positioned to continue to advance lung transplant activity worldwide.

The article’s supplementary files as