Literature DB >> 34992334

Internal fixation versus endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur for metastatic bone disease: Single institutional outcomes.

Charles A Gusho1, Bishir Clayton1, Nabil Mehta1, Wassim Hmeidan1, Matthew W Colman1, Steven Gitelis1, Alan T Blank1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared internal fixation (IF) to proximal femur replacement (PFR) for proximal femoral metastasis.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2019, 113 lesions underwent IF (n = 94) or PFR (n = 19). Revision risk was calculated with mortality as a competing event.
RESULTS: The 5-year revision risk after IF was 17.6% (95% CI, 9.8%-27.3%) compared to 7.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-28.9%) after PFR (p = 0.59). PFR had longer operative times (p < 0.001), hospital stay (p = 0.039), and higher blood loss (p < 0.001) than IF, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: IF may be considered for patients with poor health and a limited prognosis given the less-invasive procedure and shorter hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective Study.
© 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internal fixation; Metastasis; Proximal femur; Revision; Tumor endoprosthesis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34992334      PMCID: PMC8695262          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  26 in total

1.  Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms.

Authors:  Yasser Farid; Patrick P Lin; Valerae O Lewis; Alan W Yasko
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Factors associated with the decision of operative procedure for proximal femoral bone metastasis: Questionnaire survey to institutions participating the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

Authors:  Nobuhito Araki; Hirokazu Chuman; Tomoya Matsunobu; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Hirohisa Katagiri; Toshiyuki Kunisada; Toru Hiruma; Hiroaki Hiraga; Hideo Morioka; Hiroshi Hatano; Kunihiro Asanuma; Yoshihiro Nishida; Koji Hiraoka; Takeshi Okamoto; Satoshi Abe; Munenori Watanuki; Takeshi Morii; Hideshi Sugiura; Yukihiro Yoshida; Takatoshi Ohno; Hidetatsu Outani; Koichiro Yokoyama; Shoji Shimose; Haruhiko Fukuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 3.  Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review.

Authors:  Eric R Henderson; John S Groundland; Elisa Pala; Jeremy A Dennis; Rebecca Wooten; David Cheong; Reinhard Windhager; Rainer I Kotz; Mario Mercuri; Philipp T Funovics; Francis J Hornicek; H Thomas Temple; Pietro Ruggieri; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases.

Authors:  Norah Harvey; Elke R Ahlmann; Daniel C Allison; Lingjun Wang; Lawrence R Menendez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Matthew Steensma; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The surgical treatment of bony metastases of the spine and limbs.

Authors:  P Böhm; J Huber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

7.  Metastatic bone disease. A study of the surgical treatment of 166 pathologic humeral and femoral fractures.

Authors:  Y Yazawa; F J Frassica; E Y Chao; D J Pritchard; F H Sim; T C Shives
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S.

Authors:  Kathy L Schulman; Joseph Kohles
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Luca Cevolani; Silvia Spinelli; Andrea Piccioli; Giulio Maccauro; Nicola Baldini; Davide Donati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 10.  Current surgical management of bone metastases in the extremities and pelvis.

Authors:  Christian M Ogilvie; Edward J Fox; Richard D Lackman
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.